Men have poor access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Nevertheless, in LMIC and high-income countries (HICs), low SRH utilisation happens on account of several factors, such as individual, health system-related, and sociocultural factors. Identifying and addressing men’s SRH service underutilisation remains essential to improving their sexual health and averting higher mortality and early morbidity associated with poor health seeking behaviour (HSB) among men. This narrative review identifies factors influencing whether men do or do not utilise SRH services in LMICs. We report on articles published in LMICs: Africa, Asia and South America. In this narrative review, we searched for quantitative and qualitative articles published between 2004 and 2021 from international databases, including Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and reference lists of retrieved published articles. A total of 2219 articles were retrieved, from which 36 met the inclusion criteria. Factors contributing to poor uptake of SRH services by men included: a lack of access and availability of SRH services, poor health-seeking behaviour among men, and SRH facilities not being perceived as ‘male-friendly spaces’. Furthermore, our review reveals that decreased use of SRH services is attributed to factors such as a lack of focus on men’s SRH. The current underutilised state of SRH services calls for urgent implementation of evidence-based interventions. Identifying men’s SRH service inhibitors and enablers will assist programme managers and policymakers in designing SRH services tailored to their sexual health needs. Despite numerous global interventions to motivate men, the findings provide insight into the underutilisation of SRH services. The study also reveals the inadequate comprehensive investigation of men’s SRH service utilisation, especially older men, to comprehend men’s problems fully. Further research needs to be conducted on SRH issues, including vasectomy, mental health, and chronic conditions related to sexual and reproductive health. The analysis can assist SRH policymakers and program managers in strengthening the policies to motivate men to engage better with SRH services.

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services’ underutilization by men remains a global public health challenge. SRH problems constitute major health challenges in that they form almost one-seventh of the disease burden and contribute to higher and earlier morbidity among men. We, therefore, invited subject matter experts to collaborate in co-creating intervention strategies to enhance men’s utilization of SRH services. We employed the nominal group technique (NGT) for data collection. The NGT is a structured method that involves gathering a group of people to discuss a problem for the purpose of achieving a group consensus and planning actions for the selected problem. The participants who were purposively sampled included researchers, scientists, academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The participants suggested the need to improve men’s knowledge, provide healthcare resources such as equipment, medical supplies, and SRH-trained male healthcare workers, deal with healthcare workers’ negative attitudes through training and capacitation, and destigmatize socially constructed gender norms that deter men from seeking medical help. These important intervention strategies can be implemented to encourage men’s use of SRH services. Men’s current underutilization of SRH services requires the urgent implementation of evidence-based interventions. Collaborating with SRH experts in identifying appropriate intervention strategies can assist program managers and policymakers in designing SRH services tailored to men’s sexual health needs.

Background Low-Middle-Income countries (LMIC) present with a high aversion to the utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) services by men. Nevertheless, in both Low-Middle-Income and High-Income countries, low SRH utilization is mainly related to men's poor Health Seeking Behaviour (HSB). Identifying SRH inhibitors and facilitators remains an essential approach to improve SRH utilization and avert higher mortality and earlier morbidity associated with poor HSB among men. This literature review identifies factors contributing to men's decisions not to utilize SRH services, particularly to inform a conceptual model illustrating men's SRH utilization in LMIC. Methods In this narrative review, we searched articles published between 2004 and 2021 from international databases, including Google Scholar, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and reference lists of retrieved published articles. Results A total of 2219 articles were retrieved, from which 51 articles met the inclusion criteria. We reveal lack of access and availability of SRH services, poor health-seeking behavior among men and, SRH facilities often not being seen as "male-friendly” spaces and not providing men's services under one roof as the underlying factors contributing to the poor uptake of SRH services by men. Further influences to decline in SRH utilization by men included lack of focus on adult men's sexual and reproductive health; the lack of inclusion of men in a meaningful way; and the insufficient evidence about large-scale and implementable approaches to address men’s SRH needs. Our reviews reveal that dealing with negative or inhibiting factors to manage low utilization of SRH services had improved men's SRH utilization where this was carried out. We conclude by proposing a framework to illustrate men's engagement with SRH services.

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is essential for men’s health, but a large body of research has indicated that the underutilization of most SRH services by men is a persistent issue that needs to be addressed. Men’s reluctance to access sexual and reproductive health services is one of the factors that leads to high morbidity and mortality rates among men, although their diseases may have been prevented or cured. This study aimed to explore factors that influence the decision of men who resided in men’s hostels and who accessed urology clinics in KwaZulu-Natal to seek help for their sexual and reproductive health issues. An exploratory qualitative approach was adopted using focus group discussions. We interviewed seventy-two men of ages above 15 years. The data were analyzed thematically. The Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC) of UKZN granted ethical clearance (BE 347/19). Of the 72 interviewed men, thirty-three men attended urology clinics in the selected hospitals, and thirty-nine men resided in the hostels around Durban in KZN. Seven themes (lack of awareness of SRH services; participants’ reluctance to access SRH services; influence of culture and religion; lack of financial resources; influence of relationship dynamics; perceived low risk of individual sexual behaviors; and healthcare factors that discourage men from accessing SRH services) emerged from the data that were identified as barriers to SRH service utilization by men, whilst three themes (healthcare enabling factors; access to general information on SRH services; and personal motivational factors) emerged as factors that encouraged the participants to access these services. The participants’ reluctance to access SRH services was attributed to the lack of awareness of available SRH services, the influence of culture and religion, lack of financial resources, relationship dynamics, the perceived low risk of sexual behaviors for individuals, and healthcare workers’ negative attitude towards men requiring SRH services. The availability of healthcare resources, the appointment of more male healthcare workers, and more positive attitudes among healthcare workers will encourage men to utilize SRH services. The exposure of various barriers to SRH service utilization by this investigation warrants urgent attention from the government to impart knowledge about this phenomenon to men.