Endometriosis and adenomyosis are complex gynecological conditions characterized by diverse clinical presentations, including superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The hallmark features of these pathologies involve the manifestation of pain symptoms and infertility, and approximately 30% of patients are asymptomatic. Despite ongoing research, definitive treatments for these conditions remain elusive, and clinical management primarily revolves around medical or surgical interventions. Recent advancements in our understanding of the efficacy of various treatment modalities, including medical therapy and surgical interventions, have provided clinicians with valuable insights into pain relief and fertility preservation. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the latest literature on clinical outcomes, treatment options, and management strategies for different types of endometriosis. By synthesizing the newest available data, this review seeks to inform clinicians and guide decision making based on factors such as patients’ symptom severity, childbearing desire, and overall health.

Chromosomal structural rearrangements (SR) can impair gametogenesis, increasing the risk of embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal content (i.e., with a gain or loss of chromosomal material). In such cases, assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) is recommended to identify embryos with a normal or balanced karyotype. However, data on IVF laboratory outcomes in this context remain limited. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 548 ART cycles, comprising 129 with PGT-SR and 419 with PGT-A, conducted at a single university-affiliated center. Following propensity score matching, laboratory outcomes were compared using logistic regression. The fertilization rate was comparable between groups, but the PGT-SR group had significantly lower blastocyst development (36.7% vs. 47.1%) and top-quality blastocyst development rates (9.6% vs. 21.1%). No significant differences were found either in the blastocyst development rate on days 5, 6, 7, or in euploidy rates. In the PGT-SR cohort, the generalized linear mixed-effects model indicated no significant effect of carrier gender on the normal/balanced blastocyst rate, while the type of SR was strongly associated with it: non-reciprocal SRs yielded a higher rate of normal/balanced blastocysts (89.9%) compared to reciprocal translocations (45.7%). These findings indicate that patients undergoing PGT-SR generate fewer blastocysts available for biopsy, and that in cases involving reciprocal translocations, the proportion of normal/balanced blastocysts suitable for transfer is significantly reduced. These results underscore the importance of personalized counseling in managing expectations and supporting informed clinical decision-making.