Objectives: In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC. Method: The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Information sources: Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Study selection: Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design. Data extraction: Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process. Results: Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%). Conclusions: Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters—including muscle strength and physical performance–may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.

Purpose: Management of head and neck cancer (HNC) can result in substantial long-term, multifaceted disability, leading to significant deficits in one's functioning and quality of life (QoL). Consequently, treatment selection is a challenging component of care for patients with HNC. Clinical care guided by shared decision making (SDM) can help address these decisional challenges and allow for a more individualized approach to treatment. However, due in part to the dominance of biomedically oriented philosophies in clinical care, engaging in SDM that reflects the individual patient's needs may be difficult.Conclusions: In this clinical focus article, we propose that health care decisions made in the context of biopsychosocial-framed care—one that contrasts to decision making directed solely by the biomedical model—will promote patient autonomy and permit the subjective personal values, beliefs, and preferences of individuals to be considered and incorporated into treatment-related decisions. Consequently, clinical efforts that are directed toward biopsychosocial-framed SDM hold the potential to positively affect QoL and well-being for individuals with HNC.

Background: This ORATOR sub‐study evaluated swallowing physiology in patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) for early‐stage oropharynx cancer.Methods: Swallowing physiology was evaluated using videofluoroscopy and outcomes were compared across treatment arms and correlated with MDADI scores.Results: Of the 68 patients in the ORATOR trial, 21 participated in this sub‐study (30.8%), including 15 RT Arm and six TORS Arm patients. Swallowing profiles were not significantly different between the arms. MBSImP pharyngeal scores for RT Arm versus TORS Arm patients were 4.8 (±2.1) versus 4.3 (±1.5) at baseline, 6.2 (±1.2) versus 9.6 (±4.8) at 6 months and 5.9 (±1.8) versus 8.0 (±4.7) at 12 months. MBSImP pharyngeal scores demonstrated weak associations with several MDADI subscales and PAS scores.Conclusions: To best describe swallowing outcomes in studies of RT and/or surgery, instrumental swallowing assessments should be strongly considered in addition to quality of life measures.

Objective: This study examined the relationship between gender and auditory-perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal (TE) speech. Method: We collected auditory-perceptual judgments of two features, speech acceptability and listener comfort, from normal-hearing young adult listeners (n = 16) who were naïve to TE speech. Auditory-perceptual judgments were made for 12 TE speakers (6 men and 6 women) on two occasions separated by between 7 and 14 days. During the first session, listeners were deceived about the gender of the voice samples presented, and in the second session, listeners were informed of the true gender of the voice samples. Results: The findings suggest that a gender bias exists in perceptions of TE speech, and that female TE speakers tend to be disproportionately penalized when compared to their male counterparts when gender is known. Conclusions: These data provide insights into the potential influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of TE speech and the impact that such factors may have on communication. Our data indicate that listeners rate female TE speaker samples as less acceptable and less comfortable to listen to when the samples are known to be female speakers.

In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM), or sarcopenia, is a strong prognostic predictor of survival outcomes. However, the relationship between sarcopenia and nutrition-related outcomes is not well understood. This investigation evaluated the prognostic significance of sarcopenia for feeding tube (FT) placement in a cohort of OPSCC patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted with data collected from 194 OPSCC patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Sarcopenia was assessed from computed tomography imaging at the level of the third cervical (C3) and fourth thoracic (T4) vertebrae. The prognostic nature of pretreatment sarcopenia and its relationship with FT placement was explored using logistic regression. The median age of patients included was 61.0 years, and the majority were male (83%). In this patient cohort, 87.6% underwent concurrent CRT, and 30.9% received a FT over the course of treatment. Sarcopenia was identified at baseline in 72.7% of patients based on C3 SMM measurements and in 41.7% based on measures at the level of T4. Based on measures at both C3 and T4, those with sarcopenia were significantly more likely to receive a FT and had significantly worse freedom from FT placement compared with patients without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia assessed at T4 was a significant predictor of FT placement. SMM measured at T4 may represent a novel and practical biomarker for sarcopenia detection that is associated with the need for FT placement. These findings suggest that the detection of baseline sarcopenia could guide decision-making related to the need for nutritional support in OPSCC patients undergoing RT/CRT.