Background: Bromelain and coumarins are recognized as safe and effective therapeutic agents, used by individuals to treat ailments such as postoperative edema, inflammation and other diseases. Bromelain has been proven to be well absorbed by the body after oral administration, and it has no major side effects even after prolonged use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of bromelain and other nutraceuticals in reducing post-surgical swelling, pain and the need of anti-inflammatory drugs in maxillofacial post-traumatic surgery. Methods: This prospective open-label study was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for trauma of the maxillofacial area. One hundred patients were selected and divided into two groups: one group who underwent therapy with bromelain, Aesculus hippocastanum and Melilotus officinalis and a control group that was not given the drug in postoperative therapy. Results: Patients in the experimental group showed a reduction of edema in the first and second postoperative weeks, a faster complete reduction of facial edema and a lower reduction in maximum mouth opening and needed less anti-inflammatory therapy to control pain. Conclusions: These findings seem to provide evidence that Brovas^® may be effective in improving postoperative edema outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment of facial fractures.

Background: Facial nerve injury is one of the most concerning complications of parotid gland surgery, with temporary and permanent dysfunction rates varying widely in the literature. This study aimed to identify factors associated with facial nerve injury during surgery for benign parotid tumors and assess the protective efficacy of intraoperative nerve monitoring (NIM) in preventing nerve injury. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 329 patients who underwent parotid gland surgery between 2010 and 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor characteristics (size, location, histology), surgical parameters (operation time, NIM usage), and postoperative nerve function evaluated using a modified House–Brackmann scale. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests and logistic regression, were employed to identify predictors of facial nerve outcomes. Results: Facial nerve injury occurred in 5.2% of patients, comprising 4.6% temporary and 0.6% permanent damage. Tumors located in the deep and inferior lobes significantly increased the risk of facial paralysis/palsy (p = 0.035), while tumor size and histology showed no significant associations. Using NIM significantly reduced the risk of facial nerve injury (p < 0.05; OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25–0.50). Age was also identified as a significant predictor of nerve dysfunction (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings emphasize the importance of NIM in mitigating facial nerve injury, especially in anatomically complex tumor locations. Tailored surgical approaches based on tumor location and patient-specific factors, combined with the routine use of NIM, are recommended to optimize nerve preservation and improve postoperative outcomes.

Resection of tumors of oral cavity usually causes short- or long-term sequelae such as chewing, speech and swallowing impairment. To preserve this function it is necessary to maintain the lining of the oral cavity, the mobility and sensitivity of the tongue. Reconstructive options for oral mucosal defects resulting from tumor resection included primary closure, mucosal and skin grafts, pedicle and microvascular free flaps, and dermal matrix. Retrospective study on patients undergoing reconstruction of intraoral defects, after removal of T1, T2 malignant tumors, by placement of bilayer dermal matrix. From 2021 to 2022, 47 patients with oral mucosa defects after removal of squamous cell carcinoma were treated. All patients were affected by a T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma. For each patient, data were collected regarding the site of the disease, the initial staging, the size of the surgical defect, the complications and the outcome months after the operation. In all treated cases the surgical defect involved the mucosa of the cheek, the oral floor or the tongue with an average size of 5.45cm². Patients who underwent this type of reconstruction benefited from excellent healing of intraoral wounds and good restoration of oral function 6 months after surgery. Out of the total number of patients, membrane attachment failure was reported in only two cases. As emerges from the data reported in our study, the dermal matrix represents a valid alternative in oncological reconstructive surgery for small/medium-sized intraoral mucosal defects because it allows re-epithelialization of the wound.

Airway management in maxillofacial trauma is a critical and complex challenge, requiring both secure ventilation and optimal surgical access while minimizing risks to vital structures. This study evaluated the efficacy of submental intubation (SMI) as a minimally invasive alternative to tracheostomy in patients with complex maxillofacial fractures. A retrospective analysis of 52 patients treated between 2015 and 2023 was conducted by comparing clinical outcomes between those who underwent SMI (n = 26) and those who underwent tracheostomy (n = 26). The duration of hospitalization, infection rates, and perioperative complications were assessed using t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariate regression. Results indicated that SMI was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays (11.15 ± 3.29 vs. 23.96 ± 6.47 days, p < 0.001) and lower infection rates (3.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.028). Additionally, the SMI group demonstrated fewer intraoperative (p = 0.049) and postoperative complications (p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis identified tracheostomy as an independent predictor of prolonged hospitalization and increased complications. These findings support SMI as a safe and effective alternative to tracheostomy for short-term airway management in maxillofacial trauma, providing a shorter recovery period and fewer complications. Therefore, prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these results and establish comprehensive guidelines.

Background: The surgery-first approach (SFA) in orthognathic surgery eliminates the need for pre-surgical orthodontic treatment, significantly reducing overall treatment time. However, reliance on a compromised occlusion introduces risks of condylar displacement and remodeling. This study employs artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning to analyze condylar behavior, comparing the outcomes of SFA to the traditional surgery-late approach (SLA). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 77 patients (18 SFA and 59 SLA) treated at Perugia Hospital between 2016 and 2022. Preoperative (T0) and 12-month postoperative (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed using the 3D Slicer software and its Dental Segmentator extension, powered by a convolutional neural network (CNN). This automated approach reduced segmentation time from 7 h to 5 min. Pre- and postoperative 3D models were compared to assess linear and rotational deviations in condylar morphology, stratified via dentoskeletal classification and surgical techniques. Results: Both the SFA and SLA achieved high surgical accuracy (<2 mm linear deviation and <2° rotational deviation). The SFA and SLA exhibited similar rates of condylar surface remodeling, with minor differences in resorption and formation across dentoskeletal classifications. Mean surface changes were 0.41 mm (SFA) and 0.36 mm (SLA, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Deep learning enables rapid, precise CBCT analysis and shows promise for the early detection of condylar changes. The SFA does not increase adverse effects on condylar morphology compared to SLA, supporting its safety and efficacy when integrated with AI technologies.

Background: Mandibular condylar fractures are among the most common fractures of the facial skeleton, and their surgical management remains a topic of considerable debate in maxillofacial trauma surgery. Numerous studies in the literature internationally have explored optimal treatment approaches, with a growing preference for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). While conservative treatment has traditionally been the standard for intra-articular fractures, recent research suggests that ORIF may also be appropriate for selected cases of these fractures. Methods: This study presents a 14-year review (2009–2023) of the authors’ experience in the surgical management of intra-articular condylar fractures. Data were collected on surgical techniques, early and late complications, clinical and radiological outcomes, and comparisons with conservative treatment. Results: The analysis included evaluations of both short-term and long-term outcomes following ORIF, identifying specific scenarios where ORIF demonstrated advantages over conservative management. Clinical and radiographic assessments provided valuable insights into patient recovery and functional outcomes, while complication rates were documented for both treatment methods. Conclusions: Findings indicate that ORIF can be a beneficial treatment option for intra-articular condylar fractures in select patient groups, offering improved outcomes in cases where conservative treatment may be insufficient. However, conservative management remains a valid approach when surgical risks exceed potential benefits. This study adds to the ongoing discussion, supporting a tailored approach that considers individual patient factors when choosing between ORIF and conservative treatment.