Despite the numerous benefits plants receive from probiotics, maintaining consistent results across applications is still a challenge. Cultivation-independent methods associated with reduced sequencing costs have considerably improved the overall understanding of microbial ecology in the plant environment. As a result, now, it is possible to engineer a consortium of microbes aiming for improved plant health. Such synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) contain carefully chosen microbial species to produce the desired microbiome function. Microbial biofilm formation, production of secondary metabolites, and ability to induce plant resistance are some of the microbial traits to consider when designing SynComs. Plant-associated microbial communities are not assembled randomly. Ecological theories suggest that these communities have a defined phylogenetic organization structured by general community assembly rules. Using machine learning, we can study these rules and target microbial functions that generate desired plant phenotypes. Well-structured assemblages are more likely to lead to a stable SynCom that thrives under environmental stressors as compared with the classical selection of single microbial activities or taxonomy. However, ensuring microbial colonization and long-term plant phenotype stability is still one of the challenges to overcome with SynComs, as the synthetic community may change over time with microbial horizontal gene transfer and retained mutations. Here, we explored the advances made in SynCom research regarding plant health, focusing on bacteria, as they are the most dominant microbial form compared with other members of the microbiome and the most commonly found in SynCom studies.

In agriculture, abiotic and biotic stress reduce yield by 51–82% and 10–16%, respectively. Applications of biological agents such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve plant growth. Applications of lone PGPR and AMF also help plants resist abiotic and biotic stressors. The reports for dual inoculation of AMF and PGPR to benefit plants and tackle stressors are largely unknown. It is speculated that PGPR colonization in plants enhances AMF infection during dual AMF and PGPR application, although increased AMF colonization does not always correlate with the increased benefits for the plant hosts. Further research is needed regarding molecular mechanisms of communication during dual inoculations, and dual-inoculation enhancement of induced systemic resistance under pathogen stress, to understand how dual inoculations can result in enhanced plant benefits. The influence of application timing of AMF and PGPR dual inoculations on mitigating abiotic and biotic stress is also not well understood. This review documents the factors that govern and modulate the dual application of AMF and PGPR for plant benefits against stress responses, specifically abiotic (drought) stress and stress from pathogen infection.