We are living in an era of advanced nanoscience and nanotechnology. Numerous nanomaterials, culminating in nanorobots, have demonstrated ingenious applications in biomedicine, including breast cancer (BC) nano-theranostics. To solve the complicated problem of BC heterogeneity, non-targeted drug distribution, invasive diagnostics or surgery, resistance to classic onco-therapies and real-time monitoring of tumors, nanorobots are designed to perform multiple tasks at a small scale, even at the organelles or molecular level. Over the last few years, most nanorobots have been bioengineered as biomimetic and biocompatible nano(bio)structures, resembling different organisms and cells, such as urchin, spider, octopus, fish, spermatozoon, flagellar bacterium or helicoidal cyanobacterium. In this review, readers will be able to deepen their knowledge of the structure, behavior and role of several types of nanorobots, among other nanomaterials, in BC theranostics. We summarized here the characteristics of many functionalized nanodevices designed to counteract the main neoplastic hallmark features of BC, from sustaining proliferation and evading anti-growth signaling and resisting programmed cell death to inducing angiogenesis, activating invasion and metastasis, preventing genomic instability, avoiding immune destruction and deregulating autophagy. Most of these nanorobots function as targeted and self-propelled smart nano-carriers or nano-drug delivery systems (nano-DDSs), enhancing the efficiency and safety of chemo-, radio- or photodynamic therapy, or the current imagistic techniques used in BC diagnosis. Most of these nanorobots have been tested in vitro, using various BC cell lines, as well as in vivo, mainly based on mice models. We are still waiting for nanorobots that are low-cost, as well as for a wider transition of these favorable effects from laboratory to clinical practice.

Environmental exposure to a mixture of chemical xenobiotics acts as a double-edged sword, promoting or suppressing tumorigenesis and the development of breast cancer (BC). Before anything else, we are what we eat. In this review, we highlight both “the good” and “the bad” sides of the daily human diet and dietary patterns that could influence BC risk (BCR) and incidence. Thus, regularly eating new, diversified, colorful, clean, nutrient-rich, energy-boosting, and raw food, increases apoptosis and autophagy, antioxidation, cell cycle arrest, anti-inflammation, and the immune response against BC cells. Moreover, a healthy diet could lead to a reduction in or the inhibition of genomic instability, BC cell stemness, growth, proliferation, invasion, migration, and distant metastasis. We also emphasize that, in addition to beneficial compounds, our food is more and more contaminated by chemicals with harmful effects, which interact with each other and with endogenous proteins and lipids, resulting in synergistic or antagonistic effects. Thus, a healthy and diverse diet, combined with appropriate nutritional behaviors, can exert anti-carcinogenic effects and improve treatment efficacy, BC patient outcomes, and the overall quality of life of BC patients.

Jumping translocations (JTs) are rare chromosomal abnormalities that play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of various cancer types. These rearrangements, especially those involving chromosome 1q, are frequently associated with tumor progression, therapeutic resistance, and poor prognosis. One gene of particular interest, human Jumping Translocation Breakpoint (JTB), has been identified at the site of translocation breakpoints and exhibits complex, context-dependent roles in cancer biology. JTB protein functions as a pivotal regulator in mitosis, chromosomal segregation, apoptosis, and cellular metabolism. It is functionally linked with the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) and is implicated in processes such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune evasion, and therapy resistance, especially in breast and prostate cancers. Advances in genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic research have highlighted the significant potential of JTB as a diagnostic biomarker and a target for therapeutic interventions. This review underscores the dual role of JTB as both a tumor suppressor and oncogene, depending on the cellular context, and advocates for its continued investigation at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. Understanding JTB’s multifaceted contributions to tumor biology may pave the way for novel biomarkers and targeted treatments in cancer management.