Frank Day

Dr. Frank Day


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 March 2013 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
RSRachel E. Schroeder
Rachel E. Schroeder
DSDaniel B. Stover
Daniel B. Stover
ABAlisha L. P. Brown
Alisha L. P. Brown
JBJohn Butnor
John Butnor
CHC. Ross Hinkle
C. Ross Hinkle
Summary: Uncertainty surrounds belowground plant responses to rising atmosphericCO2because roots are difficult to measure, requiring frequent monitoring as a result of fine root dynamics and long‐term monitoring as a result of sensitivity to resource availability. We report belowground plant responses of a scrub‐oak ecosystem inFlorida exposed to 11 yr of elevated atmosphericCO2using open‐top chambers. We measured fine root production, turnover and biomass using minirhizotrons, coarse root biomass using ground‐penetrating radar and total root biomass using soil cores. Total root biomass was greater in elevated than in ambient plots, and the absolute difference was larger than the difference aboveground. Fine root biomass fluctuated by more than a factor of two, with no unidirectional temporal trend, whereas leaf biomass accumulated monotonically. Strong increases in fine root biomass with elevatedCO2occurred after fire and hurricane disturbance. Leaf biomass also exhibited stronger responses following hurricanes. Responses after fire and hurricanes suggest that disturbance promotes the growth responses of plants to elevatedCO2. Increased resource availability associated with disturbance (nutrients, water, space) may facilitate greater responses of roots to elevatedCO2. The disappearance of responses in fine roots suggests limits on the capacity of root systems to respond toCO2enrichment.

19 April 2006 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
DSDaniel B. Stover
Daniel B. Stover
APAlisha L. Pagel
Alisha L. Pagel
BHBruce A. Hungate
Bruce A. Hungate
JDJohn J. Dilustro
John J. Dilustro
CHCharles R. Hinkle
Charles R. Hinkle

1 May 2001 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJohn J. Dilustro
John J. Dilustro
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
BDBert G. Drake
Bert G. Drake

1 September 2002 in Environmental and Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JDJohn J Dilustro
John J Dilustro
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
BDBert G Drake
Bert G Drake
CHCharles R Hinkle
Charles R Hinkle

9 March 2007 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlisha Lea Pagel Brown
Alisha Lea Pagel Brown
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
BHBruce A. Hungate
Bruce A. Hungate
BDBert G. Drake
Bert G. Drake
CHC. Ross Hinkle
C. Ross Hinkle

20 December 2017 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJohn Bain
John Bain
FDFrank Day
Frank Day
JBJohn Butnor
John Butnor
Accurate quantification of coarse roots without disturbance represents a gap in our understanding of belowground ecology. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) has shown significant promise for coarse root detection and measurement, however root orientation relative to scanning transect direction, the difficulty identifying dead root mass, and the effects of root shadowing are all key factors affecting biomass estimation that require additional research. Specifically, many aspects of GPR applicability for coarse root measurement have not been tested with a full range of antenna frequencies. We tested the effects of multiple scanning directions, root crossover, and root versus soil moisture content in a sand-hill mixed oak community using a 1500 MHz antenna, which provides higher resolution than the oft used 900 MHz antenna. Combining four scanning directions produced a significant relationship between GPR signal reflectance and coarse root biomass (R2 = 0.75) (p < 0.01) and reduced variability encountered when fewer scanning directions were used. Additionally, significantly fewer roots were correctly identified when their moisture content was allowed to equalize with the surrounding soil (p < 0.01), providing evidence to support assertions that GPR cannot reliably identify dead root mass. The 1500 MHz antenna was able to identify roots in close proximity of each other as well as roots shadowed beneath shallower roots, providing higher precision than a 900 MHz antenna. As expected, using a 1500 MHz antenna eliminates some of the deficiency in precision observed in studies that utilized lower frequency antennas.