Background: With the rise in the mastectomy rate, the number of patients who choose to undergo postmastectomy reconstruction has been increasing, and implant-based procedures are the most performed methods for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Among the possible complications, the most feared is the loss of reconstruction. It can be related to several reasons, but one of the most common is infection of the implant, which can lead to prolonged antibiotic treatment, undesired additional surgical procedures, increased incidence of capsular contracture, and unsatisfactory aesthetics results, with a huge psychological impact on patients. Aims: The primary intent of this study is to analyze the status of infection rates at our institution and evaluate the effectiveness of our prevention protocol since its introduction. Secondly, we compared data of the surgical site infections (SSIs) after implant-based breast reconstruction at Trieste Hospital, where the protocol has been employed since 2020, and in another center, where plastic surgeons of our team are involved, with different prevention procedures. Methods and Results: We enrolled 396 female patients, who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, using definitive mammary implants or breast tissue expanders, with or without ADM (acellular dermal matrix), both for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 patients. Patients treated at the Hospital of Trieste, with the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the experimental group (group 1), while patients treated in Gorizia by the same breast team with standardized best-practice rules, but without the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the control group (group 2). Infected patients were 5 in the first group (1.7%) and 8 in the second one (7.9%), with a global infection rate of 3.2%. Conclusion: After the introduction of our prevention protocol, we faced a lower incidence of infection after breast surgery with implants or tissue expanders.

Background/Objectives: Simulation has become an integral part of contemporary surgical training, allowing safe acquisition of technical skills with objective performance assessment. Microsurgery and robotic surgery share several technical features, including fine bimanual coordination, precise instrument control, and stereoscopic vision. This study aimed to evaluate whether a structured microsurgical course is associated with improved performance on a robotic surgical simulator and to explore its potential role within robotic training pathways. Methods: A prospective study was conducted between October 2022 and November 2025 at a single academic center, including 56 participants divided into three groups. Group A consisted of surgical residents attending a 3-day Basic Microsurgery Course; Group B included residents who did not undergo training during the same period; and Group C comprised experienced microsurgeons. Groups A and B performed two robotic simulation tasks at baseline (T0) and after three days (T1). Group C was assessed at T1 only as a reference benchmark. Performance was evaluated using simulator-derived metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired t-tests. Results: Group A showed significant improvement across several performance parameters following training, whereas no comparable changes were observed in Group B. At T1, Group A demonstrated better performance than Group B in multiple metrics. Group C achieved the highest scores and was considered a reference group. Conclusions: Structured microsurgical training was associated with improved performance in a robotic simulation setting. These findings suggest that microsurgical skills may be transferable to robotic tasks and may contribute to the early phases of robotic skill acquisition. Further studies are required to assess their impact in clinical practice.