Background: Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) rank as the third most frequent neoplasm affecting the appendix, originating from enterochromaffin cells. This study aims to evaluate the influence of various prognostic factors on the mortality rates of patients diagnosed with NETs of the appendix. Methods: Conducted retrospectively, the study involved 3346 patients, utilizing data sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Our analysis centered on investigating demographic characteristics, clinical features, overall mortality (OM), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) among the cohort. Variables showing a p-value < 0.1 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox regression analysis. A Hazard Ratio (HR) > 1 indicated an unfavorable prognosis. Results: In the multivariate analysis, higher OM and CSM were observed in males, older age groups, tumors with distant metastasis, poorly differentiated tumors, and those who underwent chemotherapy. Non-Hispanic Black individuals showed elevated mortality rates. Conclusion: Delayed diagnosis may contribute to the increased mortality in this community. Improved access to healthcare and treatment is crucial for addressing these disparities. Larger prospective studies are needed to pinpoint the underlying causes of elevated mortality in non-Hispanic Black populations, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to evaluate therapies for advanced-stage appendix NETs.

Primary adrenal insufficiency leads to the decreased production of cortisol and aldosterone. Patients develop an electrolyte imbalance, which can be severe and life-threatening. It is more common in women, usually between the second and fourth decades. We present the case of a 58-year-old female who was admitted due to laboratory findings of severe hyponatremia. Further workup revealed the underlying cause to be primary adrenal insufficiency. Our case report highlights that profound hyponatremia can present with minimal non-specific symptoms and the absence of any neurological manifestations. Correction of hyponatremia, treatment with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone, and water restriction in the management of this patient resulted in full clinical recovery.

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has seen limited use in treating multiple myeloma (MM), despite its potential to offer long-term survival or even cure through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Its limited application is largely due to concerns over serious complications like infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The possibility of GVHD exacerbation when CAR-T cells are administered to patients previously treated with allo-SCT remains a topic of concern. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) are CAR-T therapies that have been FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. A recent study using data from the CARTITUDE-1 trial has shown promising safety and efficacy of Cilta-Cel in patients with a prior history of allo-SCT. This report outlines our real-world experience with CAR-T treatment in such patients. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of CAR-T therapy in R/R MM patients who have previously undergone allo-SCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients (18–70 years old) with R/R MM treated with CAR-T therapy as part of an institutional IRB-approved protocol. Data were collected on safety and efficacy outcomes from the institution’s records. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded based on American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. Efficacy metrics included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed through the Kaplan–Meier method, with PFS defined as the time from CAR-T initiation to disease progression or death. Results: Of the 56 patients treated with CAR-T therapy, 8 (14.3%) had previously undergone allo-SCT. These patients had a median of seven prior therapy lines (LOTs), compared to five LOTs in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.04). CAR-T infusion occurred a median of 98.8 months after allo-SCT, with a range from 57.9 months to 178.5 months. CRS occurred in 87.5% of the allo-SCT group versus 77.1% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.48). One patient in the allo-SCT group developed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), requiring anakinra. At a median follow-up of 4.8 months, the ORR was 87.5% in the allo-SCT group versus 75% in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.4). Median PFS had not been reached for the allo-SCT group at the time of analysis compared to 11.9 months in the non-allo-SCT group (p = 0.5). No treatment-related mortality or acute GVHD was noted in the allo-SCT cohort. Conclusions: The study suggests that prior allo-SCT does not adversely affect the safety or efficacy of CAR-T therapy in patients with R/R MM. These findings highlight the need for further investigations with larger patient samples and longer follow-up to better understand the interaction between allo-SCT and CAR-T therapy.

Background: The past four decades have seen a steady increase in thyroid cancer in the United States (US). This study investigated the impact of the American Thyroid Association (ATA)’s revised cancer management guidelines on thyroid cancer incidence trends and how the trends varied by socioeconomic, histologic, geographic, and racial and ethnic characteristics from 2000 to 2020. Methods: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify thyroid cancer cases diagnosed among US patients between 2000 and 2020. We employed joinpoint regression software to fit, assess, and compare thyroid cancer incidence trends over time stratified by socioeconomic status (SES), histologic type, geographic location, and race/ethnicity. Results: Between 2000 and 2009, there was an average annual increase of 5.8% in thyroid cancer incidence (average annual percent change (AAPC): 5.8, p < 0.05). Subsequently, there was a modest rise (AAPC: 1.1, p < 0.05) from 2010 to 2015, followed by a significant annual decrease of 4.8% from 2016 to 2020 (AAPC: −4.8, p < 0.05). The joinpoint regression models identified prominent inflection points around 2009 and 2015, aligning with the years of the ATA’s cancer management revisions. These intricate dynamics in thyroid cancer incidence trends from 2000 to 2020 were shaped by SES and histologic, geographic, and racial/ethnic factors. Conclusions: Thyroid cancer incidence trends over the past two decades can be partially explained by the changes in thyroid cancer screening and management recommendations. These findings underscore the importance of cancer management strategies and highlight the need for targeted interventions to address disparities in thyroid cancer incidence across minority demographic groups.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) implies that a donor and a recipient are not genetically identical. Allo-SCT is used to cure a variety of conditions, including hematologic malignancies using the graft versus tumor effect, nonmalignant hematologic, immune deficiencies, and, more recently, genetic disorders and inborn errors of metabolism. Given the immunosuppressive and myeloablative nature of some of the conditioning chemotherapy regimens used during the Allo-SCT, patients are often at high risk of infection, including viral infections affecting the gastrointestinal tract, following the transplant. Furthermore, other complications such as hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) or graft-versus-host disease may occur post-transplant and may require endoscopy to assist in the diagnosis. This review will provide newer insights into the importance of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of post-Allo-SCT complications with a focus on safety and timing.