This paper provides a novel application of a multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) method to the multi-objective optimization problem of designing a two-stage helical gearbox. This study’s goal is to identify the ideal primary design elements that increase gearbox efficiency while reducing the gearbox cross-section area. In this work, three primary design parameters were selected for investigation: the gear ratio of the first stage and the coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW) of the first and second stages. The multi-objective optimization problem was further split into two phases: phase 1 solved the single-objective optimization problem of minimizing the gap between the variable levels, and phase 2 solved the multi-objective optimization issue of identifying the ideal key design factors. Moreover, the multi-objective optimization problem was handled by the SAW method as an MCDM approach, and the weight criteria were computed using the entropy approach. This study’s significant characteristics are as follows: First, a multi-objective optimization problem was successfully solved using the MCDM approach (SAW technique) for the first time. Second, the power losses in idle motion were investigated in this work in order to determine the efficiency of a two-stage helical gearbox. From this study’s findings, the ideal values for three major design parameters can be determined for the design of a two-stage helical gearbox.

In order to address the Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP) in building a two-stage helical gearbox, this work presents a novel application of the Multi-Criterion Decision-Making (MCDM) method. The aim of the study is to determine the optimal primary design factors that will increase gearbox efficiency while decreasing gearbox volume. Three main design parameters were chosen for assessment in this work: the first stage’s gear ratio, and the first and second stages’ Coefficients of Wheel Face Width (CWFW). In addition, the MOOP is divided into two phases: phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal primary design factors. Furthermore, the Entropy approach was picked to compute the weight criteria, and the MARCOS method was chosen as an MCDM method to handle the multi-objective optimization issue. The following are important characteristics of the study: Firstly, the MCDM method (MARCOS technique) was successfully applied to solve a MOOP for the first time. Secondly, this work has looked into power losses during idle motion to calculate the efficiency of a two-stage helical gearbox. The results of the study were used in the design of a two-stage helical gearbox in order to identify the optimal values for three important design parameters.

The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was applied in a novel way in this study to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of designing a two-stage helical gearbox with double gear-sets in the second stage. Finding the best fundamental components to increase gearbox efficiency and decrease gearbox cross-section area was the aim of this study. Three main design factors were chosen for investigation in this work: the first stage gear ratio and the first and second stage coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Phase 1 solves the single-objective optimization problem to reduce the gap between variable levels, and phase 2 solves the MOOP to determine the optimal critical design factors. This additionally splits the MOOP into two phases. Additionally, the TOPSIS method was used as an MCDM approach to address the multi-objective optimization issue, and the entropy approach was used to compute the weight criteria. In this study, gearbox efficiency is calculated by considering power losses during idle motion. The multi-objective optimization of a helical gearbox with second stage double gear-sets is addressed using the TOPSIS technique for the first time.

This paper provides a novel application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method to the multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP) of creating a two-stage helical gearbox (TSHG) with second-stage double gear sets (SDGSs). The aim of the study is to determine the optimum major design components for enhancing the gearbox efficiency while reducing the gearbox volume. In this work, three primary design parameters are chosen to accomplish this: the gear ratio of the first stage and the coefficients of the wheel face width (CWFW) of the first and second stages. Additionally, the study is conducted with two distinct objectives in mind: the lowest gearbox volume and the maximum gearbox efficiency. Moreover, phase 1 and phase 2, respectively, are the two stages of the MOOP. Phase 2 handles the MOOP to identify the ideal primary design factors as well as the single-objective optimization problem to minimize the difference between the variable levels. Additionally, the Multi-Attributive Ideal–Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) approach is selected to deal with the MOOP. The results of the study are utilized to determine the ideal values for three crucial design parameters in order to create a TSHG with SDGSs.

When optimizing a mechanical device, the symmetry principle provides important guidance. Minimum gearbox mass and maximum gearbox efficiency are two single objectives that need to be achieved when designing a gearbox, and they are not compatible. In order to address the multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem with the above single targets involved in building a two-stage helical gearbox with second-stage double gear sets, this work presents a novel application of the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. This study’s objective is to identify the best primary design elements that will increase the gearbox efficiency while lowering the gearbox mass. To carry this out, three main design parameters were selected: the first stage’s gear ratio and the first and second stages’ coefficients of wheel face width (CWFW). Furthermore, a study focusing on two distinct goals was carried out: the lowest possible gearbox mass and the highest possible gearbox efficiency. Furthermore, the two stages of the MOO problem are phase 1 and phase 2, respectively. Phase 2 solves the single-objective optimization issue to minimize the difference between variable levels and the MOO problem to determine the optimal primary design factors. To solve the MOO problem, the EAMR (Evaluation by an Area-based Method of Ranking) method was also chosen. The following are important features of this study: First, a MCDM method (EAMR technique) was successfully applied to solve a MOO problem for the first time. Secondly, this work explored the power losses during idle motion to calculate the efficiency of a two-stage helical gearbox with second-stage double gear sets. This study’s findings were used to identify the optimal values for three important design variables to design a two-stage helical gearbox with second-stage double gear sets.

The goal of this work is to validate the existing plasma spray mathematical models, using a calculation method and the comparison with experimental data, in order to determine their validity. A preliminary evaluation of the adhesion based on the velocity and temperature of the particles is useful to be calculated by using the mathematical model. Given the thermal-physical properties and chemical composition of a Fe-based amorphous X-5 powder, a modified model was suggested. For comparison, a series of experiments using plasma spraying of the X-5 powder were conducted. The significance of the current study consists of the model validation by using the data of the plasma spraying of the Fe-based amorphous material as a potential substitution for saving production costs by using ordinary air as the plasma generation gas. The findings show the discrepancy between the models and the experimental results. The prediction of adhesion using the mathematical models does not cover essential parameters such as the enthalpy of the particle stream. It is necessary to improve the mathematical models, including the modified one, based on the experiment results, with different pairs of particles and substrate materials. The proposed formula is applicable during the preliminary design of the spray process and the development of a new torch construction.