Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein

Dr. Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 August 2014 in British Journal of Educational Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley
JCJohn Cook
John Cook
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
MKMilos Kravcik
Milos Kravcik
CKChristine Kunzmann
Christine Kunzmann
CTChristoph Trattner
Christoph Trattner

5 September 2017
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
ARAdolfo Ruiz-Calleja
Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja
LPLuis P. Prieto
Luis P. Prieto
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley
MTMaría Jesús Rodríguez Triana
María Jesús Rodríguez Triana
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein

1 November 2013 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BKBarbara Kump
Barbara Kump
JMJohannes Moskaliuk
Johannes Moskaliuk
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley

25 April 2020 in Information and Learning Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
VTVladimir Tomberg
Vladimir Tomberg
TTTamsin Treasure-Jones
Tamsin Treasure-Jones
DTDieter Theiler
Dieter Theiler
SLStefanie Lindstaedt
Stefanie Lindstaedt
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley
Purpose: Introducing technology at work presents a special challenge as learning is tightly integrated with workplace practices. Current design-based research (DBR) methods are focused on formal learning context and often questioned for a lack of yielding traceable research insights. This paper aims to propose a method that extends DBR by understanding tools as sociocultural artefacts, co-designing affordances and systematically studying their adoption in practice. Design/methodology/approach: The iterative practice-centred method allows the co-design of cognitive tools in DBR, makes assumptions and design decisions traceable and builds convergent evidence by consistently analysing how affordances are appropriated. This is demonstrated in the context of health-care professionals’ informal learning, and how they make sense of their experiences. The authors report an 18-month DBR case study of using various prototypes and testing the designs with practitioners through various data collection means. Findings: By considering the cognitive level in the analysis of appropriation, the authors came to an understanding of how professionals cope with pressure in the health-care domain (domain insight); a prototype with concrete design decisions (design insight); and an understanding of how memory and sensemaking processes interact when cognitive tools are used to elaborate representations of informal learning needs (theory insight). Research limitations/implications: The method is validated in one long-term and in-depth case study. While this was necessary to gain an understanding of stakeholder concerns, build trust and apply methods over several iterations, it also potentially limits this. Originality/value: Besides generating traceable research insights, the proposed DBR method allows to design technology-enhanced learning support for working domains and practices. The method is applicable in other domains and in formal learning.

23 July 2019 in Journal of Learning Analytics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAdolfo Ruiz-Calleja
Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
DKDominik Kowald
Dominik Kowald
DTDieter Theiler
Dieter Theiler
ELElisabeth Lex
Elisabeth Lex
TLTobias Ley
Tobias Ley

26 November 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
SDSebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein
DTDieter Theiler
Dieter Theiler
PMPeter Marton
Peter Marton
PRPatricia Santos Rodriguez
Patricia Santos Rodriguez
JCJohn Cook
John Cook
ELElisabeth Lex
Elisabeth Lex
We present KnowBrain (KB), an open source Dropbox-like knowledge repository with social features for informal workplace learning. KB enables users (i) to share and collaboratively structure knowledge (ii) to access knowledge via sophisticated content- and metadata-based search and recommendation, and (iii) to discuss artefacts by means of multimedia-enriched Q&A. As such, KB can support, integrate and foster various collaborative learning processes related to daily work-tasks.