Next-generation immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer treatment, offering hope for patients with hard-to-treat tumors. This review focuses on the clinical applications and advancements of key immune-based therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, and new cancer vaccines designed to harness the immune system to combat malignancies. A prime example is the success of pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced melanoma, underscoring the transformative impact of these therapies. Combination treatments, integrating immunotherapy with chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapies, are demonstrating synergistic benefits and improving patient outcomes. This review also explores the evolving role of personalized immunotherapy, guided by biomarkers, genomic data, and the tumor environment, to better target individual tumors. Although significant progress has been made, challenges such as resistance, side effects, and high treatment costs persist. Technological innovations, including nanotechnology and artificial intelligence, are explored as future enablers of these therapies. The review evaluates key clinical trials, breakthroughs, and the emerging immune-modulating agents and advanced delivery systems that hold great promise for enhancing treatment efficacy, reducing toxicity, and expanding access to immunotherapy. In conclusion, this review highlights the ongoing advancements in immunotherapy that are reshaping cancer care, with future strategies poised to overcome current challenges and further extend therapeutic reach.

Nanoengineering has emerged as a progressive method in cancer treatment, offering precise and targeted delivery of therapeutic agents while concurrently reducing overall toxicity. This scholarly article delves into the innovative strategies and advancements in nanoengineering that bridge the gap between clinical practice and research in the field of cancer treatment. Various nanoengineered platforms such as nanoparticles, liposomes, and dendrimers are scrutinized for their capacity to encapsulate drugs, augment drug efficacy, and enhance pharmacokinetics. Moreover, the article investigates research breakthroughs that drive the progression and enhancement of nanoengineered remedies, encompassing the identification of biomarkers, establishment of preclinical models, and advancement of biomaterials, all of which are imperative for translating laboratory findings into practical medical interventions. Furthermore, the integration of nanotechnology with imaging modalities, which amplify cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and response assessment, is thoroughly examined. Finally, the obstacles and prospective directions in nanoengineering, including regulatory challenges and issues related to scalability, are examined. This underscores the significance of fostering collaboration among various entities in order to efficiently translate nanoengineered interventions into enhanced cancer therapies and patient management.

Cancer cells, like all other organisms, are adept at switching their phenotype to adjust to the changes in their environment. Thus, phenotypic plasticity is a quantitative trait that confers a fitness advantage to the cancer cell by altering its phenotype to suit environmental circumstances. Until recently, new traits, especially in cancer, were thought to arise due to genetic factors; however, it is now amply evident that such traits could also emerge non-genetically due to phenotypic plasticity. Furthermore, phenotypic plasticity of cancer cells contributes to phenotypic heterogeneity in the population, which is a major impediment in treating the disease. Finally, plasticity also impacts the group behavior of cancer cells, since competition and cooperation among multiple clonal groups within the population and the interactions they have with the tumor microenvironment also contribute to the evolution of drug resistance. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that cancer cells exploit to tailor their phenotypes at a systems level can aid the development of novel cancer therapeutics and treatment strategies. Here, we present our perspective on a team medicine-based approach to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations exist in 15–50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnoses. Although effective therapeutics have been developed in the form of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), various mechanisms of resistance lead to treatment failure after exposure to EGFR TKI-based therapy. Of these, histologic transformation (HT) into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 14% of cases. Methods: Within a single institution, we retrospectively reviewed longitudinal data from both tissue and liquid biopsies of patients with histologic transformation after a diagnosis of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We sought to further characterize the baseline and emergent genomic alterations after HT to SCLC in the context of TKI exposure, along with germline alterations that may contribute to lineage plasticity and outcomes. Results: Fifteen patients were included in our analysis. Of these, EGFR exon 19 deletions were the most frequent (n = 11, 73.3%), followed by L858R (n = 3, 20%) and L861Q (n = 1, 6.7%). The median time for transformation was 17 months (95%CI, 8.9–41.9 months). The median OS of our cohort was 51.6 months (95%CI, 26.3—NE) with a median OS post-transformation of 13.4 months. Recurrent genomic alterations included TP53, Rb1, PIK3CA, and BRAF. Germline testing revealed a pathogenic alteration in FBN1, with a recurrent variant of unknown significance (VUS) in PALLD. Conclusion: Post-transformation somatic mutation testing and germline testing at presentation revealed unique mutational profiles not previously reported in the setting of HT to SCLC. Further investigations are required to determine the optimal treatment and sequencing following HT.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a major axis of phenotypic plasticity not only in diseased conditions such as cancer metastasis and fibrosis but also during normal development and wound healing. Yet-another important axis of plasticity with metastatic implications includes the cancer stem cell (CSCs) and non-CSC transitions. However, in both processes, epithelial (E) and mesenchymal (M) phenotypes are not merely binary states. Cancer cells acquire a spectrum of phenotypes with traits, properties, and markers of both E and M phenotypes, giving rise to intermediary hybrid (E/M) phenotypes. E/M cells play an important role in tumor initiation, metastasis, and disease progression in multiple cancers. Furthermore, the hybrid phenotypes also play a major role in causing therapeutic resistance in cancer. Here, we discuss how a systems biology perspective on the problem, which is implicit in the ‘Team Medicine’ approach outlined in the theme of this Special Issue of The Journal of Clinical Medicine and includes an interdisciplinary team of experts, is more likely to shed new light on EMT in cancer and help us to identify novel therapeutics and strategies to target phenotypic plasticity in cancer.