Background: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are frequently managed by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Insertion of medial and lateral pins is more stable than lateral pinning alone, but carries an increased risk for ulnar nerve damage. This study describes the use of electrical stimulation concurrent with medial pin insertion as a monitoring technique for avoiding iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 138 children, mean age 5.6 years (SD±2.5), who were admitted to the hospital between 2007 and 2010 with uncomplicated supracondylar fractures, Gartland type II and above, and intact neurovascular presentation. The location of the ulnar nerve was identified and marked preoperatively by observing twitch contractions in response to electrical stimulation. The medial pin served as an active electrode during pin insertion, and repeated stimulation throughout the insertion process ensured no contact with the response of the ulnar nerve. After pin insertion, ulnar nerve stimulation was used again to ensure nerve continuity viability. Results: All fractures were stabilized with 2 to 4 cross K-wires (size 1.6 mm), with number depending on stability of the fracture. The children were discharged home 2 days after fracture fixation, with no iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury observed in any of the children. The only postoperative complication involved 2 cases of anterior interosseus nerve neuropraxia, which resolved spontaneously after 4 to 6 months. Primary fracture healing was achieved without nonunions or delayed unions in all cases. Conclusions: Ulnar nerve stimulation before and during the percutaneous pinning of supracondylar fractures in children is a simple, economical, and easy-to-implement technique that can prevent iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Introduction: Fractures in the ankylotic spine may have an insidious presentation but are prone to displace with devastating consequences. The long lever arm of ankylosed spine fragments may lead to pulmonary and great vessel injury and is difficult to adequately immobilize. Conservative treatment will produce in many cases poor outcomes with high morbidity and mortality. Open surgical treatment is also fraught with technical difficulties and can lead to major blood loss and prolonged operative times. In recent years, percutaneous instrumentation of non-ankylotic spine fractures has gained popularity, producing similar outcomes to open surgery with shorter operative times and reduced blood loss and hospital length of stay. We describe our experience implementing these techniques in ankylotic spine patients. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved from our hospital’s electronic health records all patients treated for thoracolumbar spine fractures between 2008 and 2015 with a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Operative and postoperative data, results, and complications were tabulated, and radiographic parameters were evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients with ankylotic spine disease underwent percutaneous augmented instrumentation between 2008 and 2015. The mean age was 76. All patients had at least one comorbidity. The mean number of ankylosed levels was 14. Mean operative time was 131 min. The average postoperative hemoglobin decrease was 1.21 gr/%, with only 4 patients requiring blood transfusion. 45.8% of the patients had postoperative medical complications. One patient (4.2%) had a superficial postoperative infection, and one patient died in hospital. The average hospital length of stay was 14.55 days. All patients retained their preoperative ASIA grades, and 3 improved one grade. All patients united their fractures without losing reduction. Conclusions: PMMA-augmented percutaneous instrumentation is an attractive surgical option for this difficult patient subset, especially when compared to other available current alternatives.

Background: Controversy still exists regarding the optimal method for post-operative skin closure in orthopedic surgery. In total knee replacement, closure with metal staples is faster but carries a higher surgical site infection (SSI) risk. Other studies have found differing results in foot and ankle and hip surgery. Very little evidence exists on this subject after spine surgery. The aim of this study was to determine whether closure of the skin incision in open posterior spine surgery carries a different rate of post-operative SSI when using nylon sutures compared with metal staples. Methods: Up to 2006, virtually all skin incisions at our spine surgery unit were closed with metal staples and from 2006 onward with nylon sutures. This was a retrospective historical control study comparing the incidence of SSIs in patients operated on before (n = 127; staples) and after (n = 143; sutures) the transition date. Results: The staples group had an overall 11.8% combined deep and superficial infection rate whereas the nylon suture group had a 4.2% rate (p = 0.017). The two groups also differed in the type of antibiotic prophylaxis used, likelihood of incisional discharge, and the number of days the vacuum drains remained. Conclusions: In our departmental setting, closure of the skin incision with nylon sutures after open posterior spine surgery carried a significantly lower risk of post-operative SSI compared with metal staples. The generalizability of our findings is unclear, but they warrant further investigation.

Cerebro-spinal fluid leakage from a spinal stab wound is rare, and usually not a life-threatening injury. Pneumocephalus, a possible rare complication of traumatic cerebro-spinal fluid leakage, can potentially lead to intracranial hemorrhage and death. We describe two cases of spinal stab wounds complicated by cerebro-spinal fluid leakage, one of them developing into severe pneumocephalus. Both patients recovered completely with the following treatment protocol: (a) trendelenburg positioning of the patient, (b) insertion of a continuous-drainage cerebro-spinal fluid catheter into the lumbar thecal sac, (c) primary suture of the leaking skin wound, (d) IV antibiotic therapy.