The aim of this study was to characterize the genotype and phenotype heterogeneity of patients with SCN1A gene mutations in the Polish population, fulfilling the criteria for the diagnosis of Dravet syndrome (DRVT). Particularly important was the analysis of the clinical course, the type of epileptic seizures and the co-occurrence of additional features such as intellectual disability, autism or neurological symptoms such as ataxia or gait disturbances. Based on their results and the available literature, the authors discuss potential predictors for DRVT. Identifying these early symptoms has important clinical significance, affecting the course and disease prognosis. 50 patients of the Pediatric Neurology Clinic of the Institute of Mother and Child in Warsaw clinically diagnosed with DRVT and carriers of SCN1A pathogenic variants were included. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from caregivers and available medical records. Patients in the study group did not differ significantly in parameters such as type of first seizure and typical epileptic seizures from those described in other studies. The age of onset of the first epileptic seizure was 2–9 months. The co-occurrence of intellectual disability was confirmed in 71% of patients and autism in 18%. The study did not show a correlation between genotype and phenotype, considering the severity of the disease course, clinical symptoms, response to treatment, the presence of intellectual disability, autism symptoms or ataxia. From the clinical course, a significant problem was the differentiation between complex febrile convulsions and symptoms of DRVT. The authors suggest that parameters such as the age of the first seizure, less than one year of age, the onset of a seizure up to 72 h after vaccination and the presence of more than two features of complex febrile seizures are more typical of DRVT, which should translate into adequate diagnostic and clinical management. The substantial decrease in the age of genetic verification of the diagnosis, as well as the decline in the use of sodium channel inhibitors, underscores the growing attention of pediatric neurologists in Poland to the diagnosis of DRVT.

Studies conducted on large populations show a lack of connection between vaccination and serious neurological symptoms. However, there are isolated cases that indicate such a relationship. These reports on adverse effects following immunization (AEFI) reduce social confidence in vaccination; however, their background may be rare genetic defects. The aim of the presented study was to examine if neurological AEFI in children may be associated with variants in genes related to neurodevelopment. To identify such possible associations, a descriptive study of the Polish case series was conducted. We performed next-generation sequencing in patients who, up to 4 weeks of injection of any vaccine, manifested neurological AEFI. We included 23 previously normally developing children with first seizures that occurred after vaccination. We identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in genes engaged in neurodevelopment in nine patients and variants of uncertain significance in another nine patients. The mutated genes belonged to the group of genes related to epilepsy syndromes/epileptic encephalopathy. We showed that AEFI might have a genetic background. We hypothesized that in some AEFI patients, the vaccine might only trigger neurological symptoms that would have been manifested anyway as a result of a pathogenic variant in a gene engaged in neurodevelopment.

Background: This report focuses on the treatment histories of 21 patients diagnosed with Dravet syndrome (DRVT) under the care of the Mother and Child Institute in Warsaw. This paper aims to present typical treatment schemes for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, as well as to highlight the influence of genetic diagnosis on pharmacotherapeutic management and to present an economic analysis of hospitalization costs. This paper will also summarize the effectiveness of the latest drugs used in DRVT. Methods: Clinical data were collected retrospectively from available medical records. The effectiveness of anticonvulsant treatment was assessed based on epileptic seizure diaries and observations by caregivers and pediatric neurologists. Results: The study group (n = 21) consisted of patients aged 3–26 years. Orphan drugs dedicated to Dravet syndrome were introduced in all patients due to the genetic diagnosis, which significantly improved the patients’ clinical conditions. The breakthrough drugs were stiripentol (in 16/21) and fenfluramine (in 3/21). Conclusions: In recent years, molecular genetics has rapidly developed in Poland, along with a steady increase in knowledge of Dravet syndrome among the medical profession. Early and precise diagnosis provides the opportunity to target treatment with drugs dedicated to Dravet syndrome with high efficacy.

SCN1A-related diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders with an expanding spectrum of phenotypes. Until recently, mutations in this gene were associated with epileptic syndromes and epileptic and developmental encephalopathy – Dravet syndrome, which was contrasted with a new group of early-onset syndromes, non-Dravet developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs; OMIM: PS308350). The aim of this paper is to review published data on the phenotypic variability of SCN1A-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, particularly non-Dravet syndromes. These are disorders with very early onset, polymorphic, drug-resistant epileptic seizures, impaired psychomotor development and intellectual disability, as well as the presence of additional symptoms such as arthrogryposis, osteopenia, and hyperkinetic movement disorders. Unlike Dravet syndrome, epileptic seizures begin in the first few months of life and may have an epileptic spasm or tonic morphology. The ability to quickly recognise the non-Dravet developmental and epileptic encephalopathy is of significant clinical value, because the identification of pathogenic SCN1A variants and their functional evaluation have an impact on both treatment and prognosis. Studies on the aetiology of non-Dravet developmental and epileptic encephalopathies have shown that pathogenic variants of the gain of function (GOF) type are identified in these patients. Therefore, it is possible to treat such patients with medicaments from the group of sodium channel blockers, which were contraindicated in cases of loss of function (LOF) variants, occurring in Dravet syndrome.