Francisco Caamano Isorna

Dr. Francisco Caamano Isorna

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 May 2002 in Annals of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMiguel A. Hernán
Miguel A. Hernán
BTBahi Takkouche
Bahi Takkouche
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
JGJuan J. Gestal‐Otero
Juan J. Gestal‐Otero

13 December 2004 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMahyar Etminan
Mahyar Etminan
BTBahi Takkouche
Bahi Takkouche
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
ASAli Samii
Ali Samii
Objective To explore the association between migraine and risk of ischaemic stroke. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Observational studies published between 1966 and June 2004 (identified through Medline and Embase) that examined the association between migraine and risk of ischaemic stroke. Results 14 studies (11 case-control studies and 3 cohort studies) were identified. These studies suggest that the risk of stroke is increased in people with migraine (relative risk 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.89 to 2.48). This increase in risk was consistent in people who had migraine with aura (relative risk 2.27, 1.61 to 3.19) and migraine without aura (relative risk 1.83, 1.06 to 3.15), as well as in those taking oral contraceptives (relative risk 8.72, 5.05 to 15.05). Conclusions Data from observational studies suggest that migraine may be a risk factor in developing stroke. More studies are needed to explore the mechanism of this potential association. In addition, the risk of migraine among users of oral contraceptives must be further investigated.

1 March 2004 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMahyar Etminan
Mahyar Etminan
BTBahi Takkouche
Bahi Takkouche
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
Purpose: To determine whether intake of tomato products reduces the risk of prostate cancer using a meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE and contacted authors to identify potential studies. Log relative risks (RRs) were weighed by the inverse of their variances to obtain a pooled estimate with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Logistic regression and Poisson regression analyses were used to determine the effect produced by a daily intake of one serving of tomato product. Results: Eleven case-control studies and 10 cohort studies or nested case-control studies presented data on the use of tomato, tomato products, or lycopene and met our inclusion criteria. Compared with nonfrequent users of tomato products (1st quartile of intake), the RR of prostate cancer among consumers of high amounts of raw tomato (5th quintile of intake) was 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–1.00). For high intake of cooked tomato products, this RR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.71–0.92). The RR of prostate cancer related to an intake of one serving/day of raw tomato (200 g) was 0.97 (95% CI 0.85–1.10) for the case-control studies and 0.78 (95% CI 0.66–0.92) for cohort studies. Conclusion: Our results show that tomato products may play a role in the prevention of prostate cancer. However, this effect is modest and restricted to high amounts of tomato intake. Further research is needed to determine the type and quantity of tomato products with respect to their role in preventing prostate cancer.

1 June 2006 in Neuroepidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
MVMontserrat Corral Varela
Montserrat Corral Varela
AMAgustín Montes-Martínez
Agustín Montes-Martínez
BTBahi Takkouche
Bahi Takkouche
Considerable controversy exists about the role of education in the risk of dementia. Individual studies have not been conclusive so far. To examine the hypothesis that lower education is associated with a higher risk of dementia, we carried out a meta-analysis. Observational studies published as of October 2005 that examined the association between education and risk of dementia were systematically reviewed. Relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios were extracted from cohort and case-control studies. We first compared the risk of dementia in subjects with high level of education with the risk of dementia in those with low educational level. In a subsequent analysis, we compared the risk of persons with high education with the risk of subjects with education level other than high (medium, low). We weighted log RRs for cohort studies or odds ratios by the inverse of their variances. Nineteen studies were included in our meta-analysis (13 cohort and 6 case-control studies). RRs for low versus high education level were: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) 1.80 (95% CI: 1.43–2.27); non-AD dementias, 1.32 (95% CI: 0.92–1.88), and all dementias 1.59 (95% CI: 1.26–2.01). For low and medium versus high education level, the RRs were: AD 1.44 (95% CI: 1.24–1.67); non-AD 1.23 (95% CI: 0.94–1.61), and all dementias 1.33 (95% CI: 1.15–1.54). These results confirm that low education may be a risk factor for dementia, especially for AD.

1 January 2000 in European Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAdolfo Figueiras
Adolfo Figueiras
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
JGJuan Jesús Gestal-Otero
Juan Jesús Gestal-Otero

1 November 2013 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNayara Mota
Nayara Mota
MPMaría Parada
María Parada
ACAlberto Crego
Alberto Crego
SDSonia Doallo
Sonia Doallo
Francisco Caamano IsornaFrancisco Caamano Isorna
Francisco Caamano Isorna
MVMontserrat Corral Varela
Montserrat Corral Varela