Background: The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is not yet fully elucidated. Of all treatment options, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and non-operative treatment (NOT) appear to provide the best results. Evidence to guide the choice between the two is sparse. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the available evidence on RSA versus NOT. Methods: Studies comparing complex proximal humerus fractures in patients aged >65 years treated either with RSA or NOT were included for systematic review and direct comparison via pooled analysis of patient-rated outcome and range of motion. Indirect comparison of case series and non-comparative studies on either treatment was performed separately. Results: Three comparative studies including 77 patients treated with RSA and 81 treated non-operatively were analysed. The RSA group scored better for both the Constant–Murley score (mean difference 6 points) and DASH score (mean difference 8 points). No differences were detected in ASES, PENN score, pain scores, or range of motion between treatment groups. The most common complications for RSA were infection (3%), nerve injury (2%), and dislocation (2%). Reoperation was required in 5%. In the NOT group, common complications included malunion (42%), osteonecrosis (25%), and non-union (3%); no reoperation was required. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. Conclusions: The functional outcomes and range of motion after RSA seemed satisfactory and potentially superior to NOT in elderly patients. Patient satisfaction was comparable despite a high malunion and osteonecrosis rate in the non-operative treatment group, which did not require re-interventions.

Felix Peuker, B.Sc., Thomas Philip Bosch, B.Sc., Roderick Marijn Houwert, M.D., Ph.D., Ruben Joost Hoepelman, M.D., Menco Johannes Sophius Niemeyer, M.D., Mark van Baal, M.D., Ph.D., Fabrizio Minervini, M.D., Ph.D., Frank Johannes Paulus Beeres, M.D., Ph.D., Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall, M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc.. J Chest Surg 2024;57:430-9. https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.23.134

Due to the increasing burden on the heatlhcare system the usefulness of the routinely planned 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph in patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures, including clavicle, proximal humerus, humeral shaft, olecranon, radial shaft, and distal radius, should be investigated. This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for the most common upper extremity fractures between 2019 and 2022 in a level 1 trauma center. The first outcome of interest was the incidence of abnormalities found on the radiograph taken at the 6-week outpatient visit. Abnormalities were defined as all differences between the intraoperative (or direct postoperative) and 6-week radiograph. In case an abnormality was detected, the hospital records were screened to determine its clinical consequence. The clinical consequences were categorized into requiring either additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed range of motion (ROM). The second outcome of interest was the incidence of deviations from the local standard postoperative treatment and follow-up protocol based on the 6-week outpatient visit as a whole. Deviations were also categorized into either requiring additional diagnostics, additional interventions, change of standard postoperative immobilization, weightbearing, or allowed ROM. A total of 267 patients were included. Abnormalities on radiograph at 6 weeks postoperatively were found in only 10 (3.7%) patients, of which only 4 (1.5%) had clinical implications (in 3 patients extra imaging was required and in 1 patient it was necessary to deviate from standard weightbearing/ROM limitation regimen). The clinical/radiologic findings during the 6-week outpatient visit led to a deviation from standard in only 8 (3.0%) patients. Notably, the majority of these patients experienced symptoms suggestive of complications. The routine 6-week outpatient visit and radiograph, after surgery for common upper extremity fractures, rarely has clinical consequences. It should be questioned whether these routine visits are necessary and whether a more selective approach should be considered.

Background: Peri-operative cardiopulmonary collapse (CPC) poses an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, especially in frail patients. Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (BCIS) is CPC following, cemented, arthroplasty, characterized by hypoxia and/or hypotension. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between cemented hemiarthroplasty and CPC, in patients with a femoral neck fracture (FNF) and increased pre-operative risk, and identify other risk factors for cardiopulmonary collapse. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with a FNF treated with a cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty, aged ≥ 80 years, with ASA score ≥ 3 and ≥ 1 cardiac or pulmonal comorbidity. CPC was defined as hypoxia/hypotension grade ≥ 2 according to Donaldson’s criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding in the relation between cemented hemiarthroplasty and CPC, and to identify other risk factors for CPC in patients with a cemented hemiarthroplasty. Results: The incidence of CPC was 51.1% in 221 cemented hemiarthroplasty patients compared to 23.3% in 73 uncemented hemiarthroplasty patients (p < 0.001). The use of cement increased the risk for CPC almost threefold (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46–5.64). Preoperative reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (aOR 3.03, 95% CI 1.50–6.14) was another independent risk factor for CPC. Conclusion: Cementation increases the risk of CPC in frail FNF patients treated with hemiarthroplasty. Emphasis on euvolemia and avoidance of excessive pressurization, and careful consideration of an indicated cemented hemiarthroplasty in frail hip fracture patients may be advised for patients with an increased preoperative risk for BCIS.

Hip fractures in elderly patients present significant challenges to healthcare systems. The direct anterior approach (DAA) has shown advantages in total hi