Background: Diagnosis and operative treatment of syndesmotic ankle injuries remain challenging due to the limitations of 2-dimensional imaging. The aim of this study was therefore to develop a reproducible method to quantify the displacement of a syndesmotic lesion based on 3-dimensional computed imaging techniques. Methods: Eighteen patients with a unilateral syndesmotic lesion were included. Bilateral imaging was performed with weightbearing cone-beam computed tomography (CT) in case of a high ankle sprain (n = 12) and by nonweightbearing CT in case of a fracture-associated syndesmotic lesion (n = 6). The healthy ankle was used as a template after being mirrored and superimposed on the contralateral ankle. The following anatomical landmarks of the distal fibula were computed: the most lateral aspect of the lateral malleolus and the anterior and posterior tubercle. The change in position of these landmarks relative to the stationary, healthy fibula was used to quantify the syndesmotic lesion. A control group of 7 studies was used. Results: The main clinical relevant findings demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the mean mediolateral diastasis of both the sprained (mean [SD], 1.6 [1.0] mm) and the fracture group (mean [SD], 1.7 [0.6] mm) compared to the control group ( P < .001). The mean external rotation was statistically different when comparing the sprained (mean [SD], 4.7 [2.7] degrees) and the fracture group (mean [SD], 7.0 [7.1] degrees) to the control group ( P < .05). Conclusion: This study evaluated an effective method for quantifying a unilateral syndesmotic lesion of the ankle. Applications in clinical practice could improve diagnostic accuracy and potentially aid in preoperative planning by determining which correction needs to be achieved to have the fibula correctly reduced in the syndesmosis. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Background: A reliable assessment of the ankle using weightbearing radiography remains challenging. Semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) measurements derived from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans may provide a more reliable approach. Methods: Thirty healthy individuals without any foot and ankle disorder were analyzed. We assessed 6 widely used ankle parameters (4 angles and 2 distances) using either semiautomated 3D (based on WBCT scans) or traditional 2-dimensional (2D; based on conventional radiographs) measurements. The reliability and discrepancy between both techniques were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method. Results: Five of 6 variables showed a lower reliability when derived from 2D measurements. The mean of 3 variables differed between the techniques: the 3D technique assessed that the talonavicular coverage angle was 18.9 degrees higher, the axial talocalcaneal angle was 5.5 degrees higher, and the talocalcaneal overlap was 3.7 mm lower when compared with 2D measurements. Conclusion: Semiautomated 3D measurements derived from WBCT scans provide more reliable information on ankle alignment compared with 2D measurements based on weightbearing radiographs. Future studies may show to what extent these parameters could contribute to current diagnostic algorithms and treatment concepts. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.
Background: In progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), hind- and midfoot deformities can be hard to characterize based on weightbearing plain radiography. Semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) measurements derived from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans may provide a more accurate deformity assessment. In the present study, automated 3D measurements based on WBCT were used to compare hindfoot alignment of healthy individuals to patients with PCFD. Methods: The WBCT scans of 20 patients treated at our institution with either a flexible (N = 10) or rigid (N = 10) PCFD were compared with the WBCT scans of a control group of 30 healthy individuals. Using semiautomated image analysis software, from each set of 3D voxel images, we measured the talar tilt (TT), hindfoot moment arm (HMA), talocalcaneal angle (TCA; axial/lateral), talonavicular coverage (TNC), and talocalcaneal overlap (TCO). The presence of medial facet subluxation as well as sinus tarsi/subfibular impingement was additionally assessed. Results: With the exception of the TCA (axial/lateral), the analyzed measurements differed between healthy individuals and patients with PCFD. The TCA axial correlated with the TNC in patients with PCFD. An increased TCO combined with sinus tarsi impingement raised the probability of predicting a deformity as rigid. Conclusion: Using 3D measurements, in this relatively small cohort of patients, we identified relevant variables associated with a clinical presentation of flexible or rigid PCFD. An increased TCO combined with sinus tarsi impingement raised the probability of predicting a deformity as rigid. Such WBCT-based markers possibly can help the surgeon in decision-making regarding the appropriate surgical strategy (eg, osteotomies vs realignment arthrodesis). However, prospective studies are necessary to confirm the utility of the proposed parameters in the treatment of PCFD. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.