Jielin Li

Dr. Jielin Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in Cold Regions Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
RKRennie B. Kaunda
Rennie B. Kaunda
KZKeping Zhou
Keping Zhou

1 April 2015 in Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KZKe-Ping Zhou
Ke-Ping Zhou
BLBin Li
Bin Li
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
HDHong-Wei Deng
Hong-Wei Deng
FBFeng BIN
Feng BIN

1 November 2016 in Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
KZKe-Ping Zhou
Ke-Ping Zhou
WLWei-Jie Liu
Wei-Jie Liu
HDHong-Wei Deng
Hong-Wei Deng

13 June 2018 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Yun LinYun Lin
Yun Lin
KZKeping Zhou
Keping Zhou
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
The analysis and prediction of slope stability are very important because slope failure can lead to large disasters. This paper focused on a performance comparison of four supervised learning methods for slope stability prediction. Based on characteristics of slope instability and analysis of data availability, six typical slope parameters – the unit weight, cohesion, internal friction angle, slope inclination, slope height and pore water ratio – were chosen to establish the evaluation index system. The gravitational search algorithm (GSA), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) and naive Bayesian (Bayes) were proposed to establish classifiers. A data set from more than 10 domestic and abroad slope projects was established to train and test the four classifiers, and then key parameters of the four models were optimized by using the method of 10-fold cross validation. The prediction performances of the four supervised learning methods were compared and analyzed. The results of accuracy, Kappa and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves reveal that both GSA and RF models can achieve satisfactory results, and the GSA model can obtain the best results when compared with the other three learning methods. Finally, 7 models with varying indicators are investigated to obtain the parameter sensitivity based on RF and GSA models.

14 May 2018 in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKBo Ke
Bo Ke
KZKeping Zhou
Keping Zhou
CXChaoshui Xu
Chaoshui Xu
HDHongwei Deng
Hongwei Deng
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
FBFeng Bin
Feng Bin

1 July 2016 in Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KZKe-Ping Zhou
Ke-Ping Zhou
YLYun Lin
Yun Lin
HDHong-Wei Deng
Hong-Wei Deng
Jielin LiJielin Li
Jielin Li
CLChuan-Ju Liu
Chuan-Ju Liu