The goal of this study is to evaluate the incidence of complications and the functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the proximal humeral locking plate (Philos). Prospective case series. Multicenter study in 8 trauma units (levels I, II, and III) with recruitment between September 12, 2002, and January 9, 2005. One hundred fifty-seven patients with 158 fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation with a Philos plate. Occurrence of postoperative complications up to 1 year and active follow-up for 1 year with radiologic assessment to observe fracture healing, alignment, reduction, avascular necrosis, and functional outcome measurements including Constant, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and Neer scores. One-year follow-up rate was 84%. The incidence of experiencing any implant-related complication was 9% and 35% for nonimplant-related complications. Primary screw perforation was the most frequent problem (14%) followed by secondary screw perforation (8%) and avascular necrosis (8%). After 1 year, a mean Constant score of 72 points (87% of the contralateral noninjured side), a mean Neer score of 76 points, and a mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score of 16 points were achieved. Fixation with Philos plates preserves achieved reduction, and a good functional outcome can be expected. However, complication incidence proportions are high, particularly due to primary and secondary screw perforations into the glenohumeral joint, with an overall complication rate of 35%. More accurate length measurement and shorter screw selection should prevent primary screw perforation. Awareness of obtaining anatomic reduction of the tubercles and restoring the medial support should reduce the incidence of secondary screw perforations, even in osteopenic bone.

The proximal femur nail antirotation represents a new generation of intramedullary nailing devices for fixation of stable and unstable trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. We report 3 cases of postoperative perforation of the helical blade through the femoral head into the hip joint without any signs of rotational or varus displacement of the fracture.

The Locking Compression Plate (LCP) system offers a number of advantages in fracture fixation combining angular stability through the use of locking screws with traditional fixation techniques. This makes the implant particularly suitable for use in poor bone stock and complex joint fractures, especially in the epimetaphyseal area. However, the system is complex, requiring careful attention to biomechanical principles, and a number of potential pitfalls need to be considered. These pitfalls are illustrated in the 4 cases described herein, in which treatment was unsuccessful due to implant breakage or loosening. In each case, treatment failure could be attributed to the choice of an inappropriate plate and/or fixation technique, rather than to the features of the Locking Compression Plate system itself. Such experiences highlight the importance of detailed understanding of the biomechanical principles of plate fixation as well as careful preoperative planning for the successful use of the Locking Compression Plate system.

To evaluate whether the implantation of the modular trochanter stabilizing plate (TSP) in addition to the dynamic hip screw (DHS) prevents excessive telescoping and limb shortening in four-part and selected three-part trochanteric fractures. Prospective clinical study. The study was conducted at the trauma unit of the Surgical Department of the University of Basel, Switzerland. Forty-six consecutive patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were treated with an additional TSP superimposed on the regular DHS at our institution between July 1991 and July 1993. Five patients died before the first follow-up, one patient was lost to follow-up, and another patient refused follow-up. Thus, thirty-nine patients were followed for at least twelve months (mean 14 months, range 12 to 20 months). The fractures treated were classified according to the OTA classification, which is based on the AO classification. Seventeen were 31-A2.2, seven were 31-A2.3, and fourteen were 31-A3.3 fractures. Lateralization of the greater trochanter was successfully prevented in all fractures. Limited fracture impaction was found in 90 percent (n = 35) of the patients with telescoping of 9.5 millimeters (range 0 to 30 millimeters), resulting in mean limb shortening of 5.37 millimeters (range 0 to 14.9 millimeters). Four patients suffered limb shortening exceeding fifteen millimeters (range 15.6 to 21.3 millimeters). Functional results were excellent and good in 87 percent of patients and fair in 13 percent according to the Salvati-Wilson score. All fractures had healed six months after the operation. Three complications required a secondary procedure: one from not inserting a second screw parallel to the gliding hip screw to prevent rotation of the head-neck fragment ("antirotation screw"), one because of deep infection, and one because of a refracture after premature implant removal. In unstable pertrochanteric fractures with small or missing lateral cortical buttress, the addition of a TSP to the DHS effectively supports the unstable greater trochanter fragment and can prevent rotation of the head-neck fragment. Excessive fracture impaction and consecutive limb shortening was prevented by this additional implant in 90 percent of these patients.