Kevin M. Shakesheff

Kevin M. Shakesheff


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 October 1999 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KUKathryn Uhrich
Kathryn Uhrich
SCScott M. Cannizzaro
Scott M. Cannizzaro
RLRobert S. Langer
Robert S. Langer
KSKevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff

8 July 2008 in Journal of Anatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDaniel Howard
Daniel Howard
LBLee D. Buttery
Lee D. Buttery
KSKevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff
SRScott J. Roberts
Scott J. Roberts

1 September 2000 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rebecca GreenRebecca Green
Rebecca Green
Richard Andrew FrazierRichard Andrew Frazier
Richard Andrew Frazier
KSKevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff
MDMartyn C Davies
Martyn C Davies
CRClive J Roberts
Clive J Roberts
STSaul J.B Tendler
Saul J.B Tendler

1 May 2007 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarina Sokolsky-Papkov
Marina Sokolsky-Papkov
KAKapil Agashi
Kapil Agashi
AOAndrew Olaye
Andrew Olaye
KSKevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff
Avi J. DombAvi J. Domb
Avi J. Domb

21 May 2014 in Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marco TatulloMarco Tatullo
Marco Tatullo
MMMassimo Marrelli
Massimo Marrelli
KSKevin M. Shakesheff
Kevin M. Shakesheff
LWLisa White
Lisa White
Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are a promising source of cells for numerous and varied regenerative medicine applications. Their natural function in the production of odontoblasts to create reparative dentin support applications in dentistry in the regeneration of tooth structures. However, they are also being investigated for the repair of tissues outside of the tooth. The ease of isolation of DPSCs from discarded or removed teeth offers a promising source of autologous cells, and their similarities with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) suggest applications in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine. DPSCs are derived from the neural crest and, therefore, have a different developmental origin to BMSCs. These differences from BMSCs in origin and phenotype are being exploited in neurological and other applications. This review briefly highlights the source and functions of DPSCs and then focuses on in vivo applications across the breadth of regenerative medicine. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1 August 2013 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSM.J. Sawkins
M.J. Sawkins
WBW. Bowen
W. Bowen
PDP. Dhadda
P. Dhadda
HMH. Markides
H. Markides
LSL.E. Sidney
L.E. Sidney
LWLisa White
Lisa White
The extracellular matrix (ECM) of mammalian tissues has been isolated, decellularized and utilized as a scaffold to facilitate the repair and reconstruction of numerous tissues. Recent studies have suggested that superior function and complex tissue formation occurred when ECM scaffolds were derived from site-specific homologous tissues compared with heterologous tissues. The objectives of the present study were to apply a stringent decellularization process to demineralized bone matrix (DBM), prepared from bovine bone, and to characterize the structure and composition of the resulting ECM materials and DBM itself. Additionally, we sought to produce a soluble form of DBM and ECM which could be induced to form a hydrogel. Current clinical delivery of DBM particles for treatment of bone defects requires incorporation of the particles within a carrier liquid. Differences in osteogenic activity, inflammation and nephrotoxicity have been reported with various carrier liquids. The use of hydrogel forms of DBM or ECM may reduce the need for carrier liquids. DBM and ECM hydrogels exhibited sigmoidal gelation kinetics consistent with a nucleation and growth mechanism, with ECM hydrogels characterized by lower storage moduli than the DBM hydrogels. Enhanced proliferation of mouse primary calvarial cells was achieved on ECM hydrogels, compared with collagen type I and DBM hydrogels. These results show that DBM and ECM hydrogels have distinct structural, mechanical and biological properties and have the potential for clinical delivery without the need for carrier liquids.