Introduction: The relationship between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines and inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery has garnered increasing attention. These recommendations are designed to minimize surgical stress and potentially improve recovery outcomes by modifying perioperative care.Objective: This scoping review aims to evaluate the impact of ERAS recommendations on inflammatory markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries, identifying current research gaps and consolidating findings from existing studies.Methods: Guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this review analyzed studies from databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. We included both randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells (WBC), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in laparoscopic surgery patients managed with ERAS recommendations.Results: Out of 64 initial studies, 7 met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 2,047 patients. Most of the studies focused on laparoscopic colorectal surgeries. Commonly assessed markers were CRP and WBC. The findings consistently showed that ERAS guideline could mitigate the inflammatory response, evidenced by reduced levels of CRP and IL-6, which correlated with fewer postoperative complications and expedited recovery.Conclusion: ERAS recommendations appear to beneficially modulate inflammatory responses in laparoscopic surgery, which suggests a potential for enhanced recovery outcomes. However, the evidence is currently limited by the small number of studies and inherent methodological biases. Further robust RCTs are required to strengthen the evidence base and refine these protocols for broader clinical application. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/tj8mw/

Introduction: Craniotomy, a common neurosurgical procedure, is frequently associated with substantial perioperative challenges and delayed recovery. While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated clear benefits in multiple surgical fields, their application in neurosurgery, particularly elective craniotomy, remains emerging. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy, focusing on key outcomes such as length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative pain, complications, and functional recovery. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing elective craniotomy and compared ERAS protocols to conventional perioperative care. Primary outcomes were LOS, postoperative complications, pain, early oral intake, and early mobilization. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (RoB 2.0) were independently performed by two reviewers. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), totaling 1453 patients, were included. Meta-analysis showed that ERAS protocols significantly reduced length of hospital stay (mean difference: −2.17 days; 95% CI: −2.92 to −1.42; p < 0.00001) and decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.44; I² = 0%). ERAS protocols were associated with higher odds of early mobilization (OR: 6.88; 95% CI: 3.46 to 13.68) and early oral intake (OR: 14.04; 95% CI: 7.80 to 25.26). Postoperative complications were significantly reduced in the ERAS group (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.99; p = 0.048; I² = 0%). While early urinary catheter removal showed a favorable trend (OR: 13.48), high heterogeneity (I² = 95.7%) limits interpretability. Postoperative pain on day 1 did not differ significantly between groups (mean difference: −0.37; 95% CI: −2.38 to 1.63; p = 0.72). The overall risk of bias was rated low to moderate across studies. Conclusions: ERAS protocols in elective craniotomy are associated with shorter hospital stays, lower complication rates, reduced PONV, and earlier return to function, without increasing adverse events. These findings support broader implementation of ERAS in neurosurgical practice. Further multicenter RCTs are warranted to standardize and refine ERAS components for craniotomy.

Objective: to study the effectiveness of type II pectoral nerve block (PEC II) for breast augmentation with submuscular implants by assessing opioid consumption and pain scale in the immediate postoperative period, from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to 24 h postoperatively. Methods: A prospective, controlled, randomized, and double-blind study. Thirty-four patients were analyzed during the perioperative period and in the PACU, with one group receiving bilateral PEC II combined with general anesthesia and the control group receiving only general anesthesia. Results: There was no difference between the groups regarding demographic data, surgical and anesthetic times, or intraoperative opioid use. Opioid consumption in the control group was consistently higher at all the time intervals studied, with an average morphine consumption 38.7% greater. The largest variation in morphine consumption occurred at the fourth and sixth hours postoperatively. The greatest difference in postoperative pain was 36% higher in the control group compared to the intervention group. Conclusions: patients who underwent general anesthesia combined with PEC II had lower opioid consumption and a lower postoperative pain score without associated complications, confirming the effectiveness of the procedure.