Over the last few years, given the increase in the incidence and prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), it became crucial to develop guidelines for the optimal preventive and treatment strategies for individuals facing these coexisting conditions. In patients aged over 65, HF hospitalization stands out as the predominant reason for hospital admissions, with their prognosis being associated with the presence or absence of T2DM. Historically, certain classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone), raised concerns due to an observed increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality. In response to these concerns, regulatory agencies started requiring CV outcome trials for all novel antidiabetic agents [i.e., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)] with the aim to assess the CV safety of these drugs beyond glycemic control. This narrative review aims to address the current knowledge about the impact of glucose-lowering agents used in T2DM on HF prevention, prognosis, and outcome.

Obesity is a current pandemic that sets all affected individuals at risk of heart failure (HF), and the majority of them will develop the clinical syndrome of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The diagnosis of HFpEF is challenging as it is based on the detection of subtle functional and structural remodeling of the heart that leads to diastolic dysfunction with increased left ventricular (LV) filling pressures and raised natriuretic peptides (NPs). The accurate diagnosis of HFpEF is even more challenging in patients who are obese, since the echocardiographic imaging quality may be suboptimal, the parameters for the evaluation of cardiac structure are indexed to the body surface area (BSA) and thus may underestimate the severity of the remodeling, and the NPs in patients who are obese have a lower normal threshold. Moreover, patients who are obese are prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), making the evaluation of diastolic dysfunction more strenuous. The current review aims to offer insights on the accurate diagnosis of HFpEF in patients who are obese in different clinical scenarios—patients who are obese in different clinical scenarios—such as in sinus rhythm, in atrial fibrillation, and in the case of pulmonary hypertension—by applying multimodality imaging and clinical diagnostic algorithms.