Background: Increasing evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy for genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) exists. However, no study has been conducted to eliminate the potential influence of a placebo effect associated with this procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of cooled RFA compared with a sham procedure in patients with painful knees due to OA. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, participants were randomly assigned to receive cooled RFA of the knee (cooled RFA group, n = 20) or a sham procedure (sham group, n = 20). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful responders at the three-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were successful responders at one and six months; pain intensity of the knee; functional status; medication; and satisfaction at one, three, and six months after the procedures. Results: For the primary outcome, the successful responder rate was significantly higher in the cooled RFA group (76.5%) than in the sham group (33.3%) (p = 0.018). For the secondary outcome, more successful responders were observed in the cooled RFA group than in the sham group at one and six months after the procedure (p = 0.041 and 0.007, respectively). The decreased knee pain intensity was maintained throughout the six-month follow-up period in the cooled RFA group. No differences were observed in functional status, medication change, or satisfaction in both groups. Conclusions: The cooled RFA of genicular nerves offers significant pain relief and surpasses the effects attributable to a placebo.

Background: Antihypertensive medications taken before surgery are associated with increased intraoperative hypotension, and patient positioning can further influence hemodynamics during surgery. However, the combined effects of antihypertensive medication use and patient positioning on intraoperative hypotension during spine surgery have not been clearly established. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension in patients undergoing spine surgery according to surgical position, antihypertensive drug use, and patient characteristics through a retrospective analysis of medical records. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 4,973 patients who had undergone spine surgery. Demographic data, medical history, antihypertensive medication use before surgery, and anesthetic information, including blood pressure during surgery, were collected from electronic medical records (EMRs). The incidence of hypotension according to surgical positioning (supine vs. prone) and antihypertensive medication use was investigated. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in patients positioned prone (supine: 19.06% vs. prone: 24.91%) and among those taking more antihypertensive medications (no medication: 19.49%; one medication: 25.18%; two or more medications: 32.97%). Logistic regression indicated that patients with a history of hypertension undergoing surgery in the prone position had a significantly greater risk of hypotension [odds ratio (OR) = 1.407] and severe hypotension (OR = 1.940) compared with those with no history of hypertension undergoing surgery in the supine position. Older age, longer anesthesia duration, cervical surgical site, and the use of multiple antihypertensive agents were associated with an increased risk of intraoperative hypotension. In particular, taking two or more antihypertensive drugs (OR = 1.601) and undergoing surgery in the prone position (OR = 1.505) were independent predictors of hypotension and severe hypotension during spine surgery. Conclusions: Preoperative use of two or more antihypertensive medications increases the risk of intraoperative hypotension, and spine surgery in the prone position increases the risk of severe hypotension.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the actual needle depth measured during cervical epidural block (CEB) with the predicted needle depth measured through a cervical flexion x-ray image at the paramedian approach. Methods: The study was conducted based on the medical records of patients who underwent CEB at the pain clinic of Haeundae Paik Hospital. The actual needle distance (AD) was recorded after each successful CEB. The distance from the spinolaminar line to the skin, predicted median depth (PMD), was measured using lateral x-ray images. The medial to lateral distance (MLD), which is the distance from the midline of the spine to the needle insertion point, was measured using anteroposterior (AP) x-rays. The predicted paramedian depth (PPD) was calculated using the Pythagorean formula. The PMD represents the expected depth of the median approach, while the PPD represents the expected depth of the paramedian approach. The PMD, PPD, and AD were compared with each other. Results: Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis were obtained for PMD and PPD. The CCC value of PMD was measured as 0.829, and the CCC value of PPD was measured as 0.830. In the Bland-Altman analysis, PPD was measured at − 0.13 ± 8.37 mm, and PMD was measured at 1.29 ± 8.38 mm. Conclusion: When performing CEB through the paramedian approach, the depth can be predicted using a cervical flexion x-ray. At this time, the PMD can also be used to predict the depth during the paramedian approach.

Background: Central venous catheterization by anesthesiologists carries risks such as accidental arterial puncture. This case report highlights a rare subclavian artery aneurysm (SAA) detected during ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) access, emphasizing the importance of recognizing anatomical variations.Case: An 88-year-old female with hypertension and atrial fibrillation was scheduled for lumbar laminectomy and posterior fusion. Preoperative evaluation revealed right lower lobe atelectasis and mild aortic sclerosis. During ultrasonography for right IJV catheterization, two vessels of different diameters were observed on the common carotid artery’s lateral side. The larger vessel disappeared at the upper neck level, showing arterial pulsation on Color Doppler. Postoperative neck computed tomography confirmed a right SAA and a 5-mm saccular aneurysm in the left intracranial artery. The patient had no vascular disease, trauma, or relevant family histories.Conclusions: Anesthesiologists should be aware of anatomical variations during IJV catheterization. Ultrasound with Doppler is crucial for accurate artery identification.

Background and Objectives: Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block is a promising alternative intervention for cervical radicular pain. However, factors associated with treatment responses remain unknown. This single-center, retrospective study aimed to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with treatment response to stellate ganglion block in patients with cervical radicular pain. Materials and Methods: This study included patients with cervical radicular pain who underwent ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. Successful response was defined as a ≥4-point or ≥50% reduction in the numerical rating scale score at 3 months post-procedure compared with the pre-procedural baseline. Patients who did not meet these criteria or underwent additional interventional procedures for persistent cervical radicular pain within 3 months were classified as unsuccessful responders. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with treatment response. Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that substantial cervical multifidus fatty degeneration, defined as Goutallier grade ≥2 of the cervical multifidus muscles (vs. minimal fatty degeneration, odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08–0.66, p = 0.007) and bony hypertrophy at the uncovertebral or facet joint as the primary etiology of foraminal stenosis (vs. disc herniation, OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.87, p = 0.024) were independently associated with lower odds of a successful response to stellate ganglion block. Steroid use was not significantly associated with treatment response (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18–1.49, p = 0.223). The successful response rate declined progressively with the number of risk factors: 94.7% (18/19), 50.0% (22/44), and 40.7% (11/27) for zero, one, and two factors, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Substantial cervical multifidus fatty degeneration and foraminal stenosis attributable to bony hypertrophy may be associated with lower odds of a successful response to stellate ganglion block in patients with cervical radicular pain. These factors require prospective validation before routine clinical implementation.