Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESCRCC) is an under-recognized, emerging new entity of sporadic renal neoplasms, with an approximate incidence of 0.2% of renal tumors. A total of 60 cases have been reported in the literature till date. ESCRCC are usually seen in adult females, with a low stage and indolent behavior, and rare incidence of recurrence or metastasis. They are solid and cystic tumors with variably sized cysts resembling eosinophilic RCC, showing a characteristic positive immune-expression for PAX-8, CK20 (in ~80% cases) and/or Melan–A (in ~6.7%), with negative CK7 and CA-IX expression. They consistently harbor TSC1 or TSC2 mutations in all tumors, which is a proposed molecular marker for this entity. We here present the first reported case of this rare tumor from India. The tumor was positive for PAX-8, and showed diffuse strong positivity for Melan-A, while was negative for CK7 and CK20. It was an early-stage tumor (T1), managed with partial nephrectomy, with no evidence of any recurrence/metastasis after 1 year of follow-up.

Fumarate hydratase (FH) deficient uterine leiomyomas account for only 0.4 % of all uterine leiomyomas. They are characterized by some distinct histological features and may be associated with Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome. Herein we present a series of five cases of FH deficient uterine leiomyomas in patients with a mean age of 30 years. All five patients underwent myomectomy. Three of these cases had an outside histopathologic diagnosis ranging from Smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) to Leiomyosarcoma while two cases were operated at our centre. All five cases were reported as suggestive of FH deficient leiomyomas and were advised germline testing along with genetic counselling. Immunohistochemically four of the cases showed moderate to strong positivity for 2-SC with a complete loss or reduced expression of FH while one case showed absence of 2-SC staining. Mutations in FH lead to reduced enzyme activity and accumulation of fumarate leading to a complete loss or aberrant reduced expression seen on immunohistochemistry, which confirms the diagnosis. It is important to differentiate it from a leiomyosarcoma or other malignant spindle cell tumors as these tumors follow a benign course. Their association with HLRCC also needs to be established for a suitable follow up since HLRCC-associated RCCs are often aggressive. Management of such leiomyomas is myomectomy or hysterectomy with advice of genetic testing to rule out HLRCC. Histomorphology and immunohistochemistry are imperative for a correct and timely diagnosis.

Introduction: Urothelial carcinoma poses a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The recent classification of Tumors of Urinary System by World Health Organization fourth edition) has elucidated its molecular subtypes and its associated prognostic significance. Methods: We used immunohistochemistry marker expression (CK5/6, CK20, CD44, EGFR) as a surrogate marker, to stratify 150 cases of high-grade urothelial carcinoma into the intrinsic molecular subtypes. A correlation was also done with immunohistochemical markers p53, p21, E-cadherin and Ki-67. Results: On subtyping, 47.3% cases were basal, 42.7% luminal and 10% remained unclassified. We did not find GATA3 useful for molecular stratification in our study. Muscle invasion was seen in 59% of basal and 31% of luminal subtype (P = 0.016). Squamous differentiation was most commonly associated with basal subtype (P < 0.001). EGFR expression was seen in 62% of basal and 38% of luminal subtype (P = 0.014), and thus can be used as an additional marker for molecular stratification. Overexpression of p53 was seen in 64% cases of muscle invasive and 36% of non-muscle invasive high-grade carcinomas (P < 0.0001). An inverse relationship was observed between p53 and p21 immunoexpression (r = –0.494) (P < .0001). The overall survival at 1- and 2-year interval was more in the luminal subtype, suggesting an early mortality in basal group, (P = 0.827), and at 6 years both the groups had almost similar results. Conclusion: High-grade urothelial carcinoma is challenging in terms of therapeutic strategy. Increased understanding of underlying molecular basis helps identifying targetable treatment options, and newer biomarkers will enhance predictive and prognostic stratification.