The heat treatment of aluminum alloys is very important in industries where low weight in combination with high wear resistance, good strength, and hardness are important. However, depending on their chemical composition, aluminum alloys are subjected to different mechanical and thermal treatments to achieve the most favorable properties. In this study, an Al-Zn-Mg alloy was heat-treated including solution annealing at 490 °C for 1 h with subsequent artificial aging at 130, 160, and 190 °C for 1, 5, and 9 h. The hardness (HV1) and abrasive wear resistance with three different abrasive grain sizes were measured for all samples. The highest hardness was measured for the samples artificially aged at 130 °C/5 h, 227 HV1, while the lowest hardness was measured for the samples aged at 190 °C/9 h. The highest and the lowest wear resistance was also observed for the same state, i.e., artificially aged at 130 °C/5 h and 190 °C/9 h, respectively. The critical abrasive grain size was detected for some samples, where a decrease in wear rate was observed with an increase in the abrasive grain size from the medium value to the largest. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to demonstrate the influence of the input parameters on the material wear rate.

This paper presents the results of wear tests of two types of commercial low-carbon, low-alloy martensitic abrasion-resistant steels, Hardox 450 and XAR 450, which belong to the hardness class 450 HBW. These steels, due to their increased resistance to the abrasive wear mechanism, are used for machine parts for applications in intensive abrasion environments such as construction, mining, and agriculture. The scope of work included microstructure analysis on an optical microscope, chemical composition analysis, Vickers hardness measurements at different loads (HV0.2, HV1 and HV2), and wear testing. Wear tests were carried out by the standard method “dry sand—rubber wheel”, and tests on the Taber abrader device. Microstructure analysis revealed that both steels have a similar non-oriented, homogenous, fine-grained martensitic microstructure. The results of HV2 hardness measurements showed a similar trend for both steels in all examined sections of the plates. For both tested steels, the hardness values of HV0.2 and HV1 are slightly higher than HV2, but the scattering of the results is also greater. Abrasion resistance testing using the standard “dry sand—rubber wheel” method showed that Hardox 450 steel has a lower volume loss of about 8%, but a greater scattering of the results compared to XAR 450 steel. The results of the abrasion resistance test on the Taber abrader device confirmed approximately the same behavior. For both steels, a prediction model was established for a reliable assessment of the wear intensity concerning the grain size. Although examined steels belong to the same hardness class, Hardox steel seems to be a more appropriate choice for the manufacture of machine components exposed to abrasive wear.

The primary goal of this paper was to determine if there is a difference in the intensity of abrasive wear on the radial and tangential sections of sessile oak ( Quercus petraea ) in the direction that matches or opposes the primary growth direction of the tree. The resistance to abrasion was tested on the samples using the standard 'dry sand–rubber wheel' method in both directions and on both sections. Owing to the heterogeneity of the wood structure, the abraded mass was recalculated to the abraded volume. It was found that changing the direction of abrasion relative to the primary growth direction significantly affects the abraded volume on both sections, particularly on the radial section. Abrasion was more intense when the direction of wear opposed the primary growth direction in both sections. The smallest abraded volume was measured on the radial section in the primary growth direction, and the largest was measured on the same section in the opposite direction. The distribution of results was analyzed using the Weibull distribution, with less dispersion observed in the radial section compared to the tangential section in both wear directions. The total volume loss from abrasive wear in both directions was only 3.7% greater in the tangential section compared to the radial section. These results are attributed to the complex and highly oriented microstructure of oak wood, but still not fully understood.