Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova

Dr. Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2020 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Mikhail Petrovich Kostinov
NANelli Kimovna Akhmatova
Nelli Kimovna Akhmatova
EKEkaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
AKAristitsa Mikhailovna Kostinova
Aristitsa Mikhailovna Kostinova
Background: In the last decade, adjuvant-containing vaccines, exerting different effects on the immune system, including the production of cytokines, which are one of the most important regulatory systems of the body, are introduced into practice. Objectives: An effect of the immunoadjuvant polymer-subunit and adjuvant-free vaccines against influenza on the cytokine profile of mononuclear leukocytes in 27 healthy women was studied. Methods: The study of cytokine profile in human peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes exposed to vaccines against influenza virus was determined by flow cytometry method (Cytomix FC-500, Beckman Coulter, USA) using the Multiplex-13 test system (Bender MedSystems, Austria). Results: It was established that all the studied vaccines leaded to somewhat increased levels of Th1/Th2/Th17/Th9/Th22 cytokines in the culture fluid of peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes (PBML), which indicates the activation of both humoral and cellular immunity. An immunoadjuvant vaccine has been shown to be superior in activating the synthesis of Th1 (IL-12, INF-g, IL-2, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) cytokines, IL-9 and IL-22, while the subunit vaccine was superior in activating the synthesis of IL-4, and split vaccine—of IL-5. Conclusions: Immunoadjuvant vaccine is superior in terms of inducing cellular immune effectors to a greater extent compared to subunit and split vaccines.

19 September 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
МKМikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Мikhail Petrovich Kostinov
NANelli Kimovna Akhmatova
Nelli Kimovna Akhmatova
EKEkaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
SSSvetlana Anatolyevna Skhodova
Svetlana Anatolyevna Skhodova
VSVera Nikolaevna Stolpnikova
Vera Nikolaevna Stolpnikova
AVAnna Egorovna Vlasenko
Anna Egorovna Vlasenko
To date, the advantage of adjuvanted over non-adjuvanted vaccines in the specific antibodies formation is proved. However, cellular mechanisms, including parameters of the innate immunity, involved in the vaccine-induced immune response are not well studied. The human study of inactivated vaccines showed that both subunit vaccine and split vaccine induced cellular immune response, but adjuvanted vaccine containing Polyoxidonium had the greatest potential. Despite the fact that influenza vaccines must activate endosomal receptors, they cause non-specific activation of the surface TLRs. They can trigger intracellular signals leading to the induction of antiviral mechanisms and to the activation of the body’s protective resources against microbial infections. To assess the immunological efficacy of adjuvanted vaccines and humoral reactions to vaccination it is necessary to evaluate activation of cellular mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity.

2 November 2020 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
МKМikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Мikhail Petrovich Kostinov
TLTatiana Latysheva
Tatiana Latysheva
AKAristitsa Kostinova
Aristitsa Kostinova
NANelli Kimovna Akhmatova
Nelli Kimovna Akhmatova
TLTatyana V. Latysheva
Tatyana V. Latysheva
VPValentina Borisovna Polishchuk
Valentina Borisovna Polishchuk
Background. Influenza prophylaxis with the use of quadrivalent vaccines (QIV) is increasingly being introduced into healthcare practice. Methods. In total, 32 healthy adults and 6 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) received adjuvant QIV during 2018–2019 influenza season. Depending on initial antibody titers, healthy volunteers were divided into seronegative (≤1:20) and seropositive (≥1:40). To evaluate immunogenicity hemagglutination inhibition assay was used. Results. All participants completed the study without developing serious post-vaccination reactions. Analysis of antibody titer 3 weeks after immunization in healthy participants showed that seroprotection, seroconversion levels, GMR and GMT for strains A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B/Colorado, B/Phuket among initially seronegative and seropositive participants meet the criterion of CHMP effectiveness. CVID patients showed increase in post-vaccination antibody titer without reaching conditionally protective antibody levels. Conclusion. Adjuvant QIV promotes formation of specific immunity to vaccine strains, regardless of antibodies’ presence or absence before. In CVID patients search of new regimens should be continued.

15 May 2024 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
МKМikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Мikhail Petrovich Kostinov
OSOksana Svitich
Oksana Svitich
ACAlexander Chuchalin
Alexander Chuchalin
VOValery Osiptsov
Valery Osiptsov
EKEkaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
AKAristitsa Kostinova
Aristitsa Kostinova
Mucosal immunity plays a major role not only in the prevention but probably also in the outcomes of COVID-19. An enhanced production of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) might contribute to the activation of the immune response mechanisms. To assess the levels of sIgA produced by epithelial cells in the nasal and pharyngeal mucosa and those measured in salivary gland secretions and to study the course of COVID-19 following the combined scheme of intranasal and subcutaneous administration of a bacteria-based immunostimulant agent. This study included 69 patients, aged between 18 and 60, who had moderate COVID-19 infection. They were divided into two groups: Group 1 (control group) included 39 patients who received only background therapy, and Group 2 was made up of 30 patients who received background therapy in combination with the Immunovac VP4 vaccine, a bacteria-based immunostimulant agent, which was given for 11 days starting from the day of admission to hospital. The levels of sIgA were measured by ELISA in epithelial, nasal and pharyngeal swabs, and salivary gland secretions at baseline and on days 14 and 30. The combined scheme of intranasal and subcutaneous administration of the Immunovac VP4 vaccine in the complex therapy of patients with COVID-19 is accompanied by increased synthesis of sIgA in nasal and pharyngeal swabs, more intense decrease in the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) and reduction in the duration of fever and length of hospitalization compared to the control group. Prescribing a immunostimulant agent containing bacterial ligands in complex therapy for COVID-19 patients helps to enhance mucosal immunity and improves the course of the disease.

1 January 2020 in Infectious diseases: News, Opinions, Training
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISI.I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera
I.I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera
МKМikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Мikhail Petrovich Kostinov
"U"I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)"
"I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)"
ASAnna Dmitrievna Shmitko
Anna Dmitrievna Shmitko
VPValentina Borisovna Polishchuk
Valentina Borisovna Polishchuk
EKEkaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova

1 January 2020 in Infectious diseases: News, Opinions, Training
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ISI. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera
I. Mechnikov Research Institute of Vaccines and Sera
МKМikhail Petrovich Kostinov
Мikhail Petrovich Kostinov
"U"I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)"
"I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)"
EKEkaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
Ekaterina Alexandrovna Khromova
AKAristitsa Kostinova
Aristitsa Kostinova
"A"National Research Center – Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency"
"National Research Center – Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency"