Greici Sarturi

Dr. Greici Sarturi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2020 in Long Range Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJoão Maurício Gama Boaventura
João Maurício Gama Boaventura
DBDouglas A. Bosse
Douglas A. Bosse
KMKeysa Manuela Cunha de Mascena
Keysa Manuela Cunha de Mascena
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi

8 June 2023 in Review of Policy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi
SBSimone R. Barakat
Simone R. Barakat
RGRicardo Gomes
Ricardo Gomes

1 September 2014 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRicardo Raele
Ricardo Raele
JBJoão Mauricio Gama Boaventura
João Mauricio Gama Boaventura
AFAdalberto Américo Fischmann
Adalberto Américo Fischmann
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi

18 April 2016 in International Journal of Emerging Markets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi
CVCarlos Augusto França Vargas
Carlos Augusto França Vargas
JBJoão Maurício Gama Boaventura
João Maurício Gama Boaventura
SSSilvio Aparecido dos Santos
Silvio Aparecido dos Santos
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to deepen the discussion regarding the competitiveness of clusters based on a theoretical and empirical study that compares the level of competitiveness of the Brazilian wine cluster located in Serra Gaúcha with the competitiveness of the Chilean cluster located in Valle del Maule. Design/methodology/approach: – A qualitative-descriptive approach was applied to the study, and data collection was conducted through secondary sources. Findings: – The analysis employed a competitiveness analysis model consisting of 11 competitiveness factors. The Chilean cluster presented a higher level of competitiveness in four competitiveness factors (“scope of viable and relevant business,” “introduction of new technologies,” “balance with no privileged positions” and “oriented strategy”), while the Brazilian cluster presented a higher level of competitiveness in three competitiveness factors (“concentration,” “cooperation” and “replacement”). For four of the competitiveness factors of the model, both clusters presented similar levels of competitiveness. Practical implications: – By comparing the two wine clusters, it was possible to identify aspects that can be improved to increase competitiveness, especially in the Brazilian cluster. These aspects include, first, the need for bottle manufacturers in Serra Gaúcha, which would have a positive impact on production costs; second, the expansion of the geographical indication registration for the entire Serra Gaúcha region, resulting in an enhanced image of Brazilian wine abroad; and third, greater incentives for exports, which would result in an increase in market share. Originality/value: – The paper proposes an explanation for the superior level of competitiveness of the Chilean cluster regarding the “scope of viable and relevant business,” “balance with no privileged positions,” “introduction of new technologies” and “strategy focussed on cluster development.” In terms of its contribution, the study developed additional metrics for the model adopted, which can be used for the competitive analysis of other agribusiness clusters.

12 March 2024 in Public Management Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRicardo Gomes
Ricardo Gomes
ELErika Lisboa
Erika Lisboa
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi
GMGustavo Mirapalheta
Gustavo Mirapalheta

5 April 2021 in Journal of Management and Governance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DWDouglas Wegner
Douglas Wegner
GSGreici Sarturi
Greici Sarturi
Leander Luiz KleinLeander Luiz Klein
Leander Luiz Klein