Huiling Liu

Huiling Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2017 in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChunyan Hao
Chunyan Hao
JTJinhui Tian
Jinhui Tian
HLHuiling Liu
Huiling Liu
FLFei Li
Fei Li
HNHongxia Niu
Hongxia Niu
BZBingdong Zhu
Bingdong Zhu
Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab are being in clinic trials to treat melanoma. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of them against advanced melanoma. Eleven reports from 6 randomized control trials on treating metastatic melanoma, which were divided into 3 subgroups, nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, were included and the meta-analysis was performed for each subgroup. The outcome measures were objective response rates (ORR), median progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival rates (OS), and toxicity estimated by grade 3 to 4 adverse events. For nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, the pooled risk ratios (RR) of the ORR were 3.43 (95% CI: 2.57–4.58), 2.51 (95% CI: 2.03–3.09), and 3.28 (95% CI: 2.58–4.17), respectively. The pooled HR of PFS were 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36–0.49), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50–0.66), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30–0.52), respectively. The pooled RR of 1-year OS was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08–1.74) and 1.54 (95% CI: 0.90–2.63) for nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab. These results suggested that anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy had ORR and PFS benefit compared with the control group. Anti-PD-1 treatment increased 1-year OS for patients compared with ipililumab treatment. But there is no significantly difference on 1-year OS between the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab treatment and the ipilimumab treatment group. The toxicity analysis showed that there is less risk of adverse events in the anti-PD-1 treatment group compared with the chemotherapy and ipilimumab group. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab increased the risk for high-grade adverse events compared with ipilimumab alone but the adverse events were generally manageable. Anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy improved ORR and prolonged PFS of patients with advanced melanoma and the adverse events are generally manageable. The therapy is indeed a promising approach for treatment of advanced melanoma.

10 August 2024 in Genes & Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JZJuanhong Zhou
Juanhong Zhou
XMXinyun Ma
Xinyun Ma
XLXiaofeng Liu
Xiaofeng Liu
YLYang Liu
Yang Liu
JFJiaojiao Fu
Jiaojiao Fu
HLHuiling Liu
Huiling Liu

1 October 2015 in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XCXiaoyun Chen
Xiaoyun Chen
BZBingdong Zhu
Bingdong Zhu
YLYanping Luo
Yanping Luo
DZDongdong Zhang
Dongdong Zhang
LZLang Zhang
Lang Zhang
HLHuiling Liu
Huiling Liu

17 February 2025 in Chemistry & Biodiversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WZWenyan Zhang
Wenyan Zhang
HLHuiling Liu
Huiling Liu
BZBingdong Zhu
Bingdong Zhu
WLWen Li
Wen Li
XHXue Han
Xue Han
JWJinxia Wang
Jinxia Wang
Although therapeutic proteins have achieved recognized clinical success, they are inherently membrane impermeable, which limits them to acting only on extracellular or membrane‐associated targets. Developing an efficient protein delivery method will provide a unique opportunity for intracellular target‐related therapeutic proteins. In this review article, we summarize the different pathways by which cells take up proteins. These pathways fall into two main categories: One in which proteins are transported directly across the cell membrane and the other through endocytosis. At the same time, important features to ensure successful delivery through these pathways are highlighted. We then provide a comprehensive overview of the latest developments in the transduction of covalent protein modifications, such as coupling cell‐penetrating motifs and supercharging, as well as the use of nanocarriers to mediate protein transport, such as liposomes, polymers, and inorganic nanoparticles. Finally, we emphasize the existing challenges of cytoplasmic protein delivery and provide an outlook for future progress.

1 January 2021
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YGYuanfeng Gou
Yuanfeng Gou
FLFei Li
Fei Li
XHXiaqin Huo
Xiaqin Huo
CHChunyan Hao
Chunyan Hao
XYXiaojuan Yang
Xiaojuan Yang
BZBingdong Zhu
Bingdong Zhu

5 June 2025 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJinyi Gu
Jinyi Gu
CCChangshun Chen
Changshun Chen
YCYuanjing Chen
Yuanjing Chen
WLWei Lv
Wei Lv
FLFei Li
Fei Li
BZBingdong Zhu
Bingdong Zhu
Background: B-cell lymphoma 10 (BCL10) is a key signaling molecule that plays a pivotal role in activating the NF-κB signaling pathway. However, it is unclear whether prolonged activation of BCL10 within tumors lead to T cell exhaustion and suppress immune responses against cancer.Methods: In this study, through multi-layered bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification, the role of BCL10 on immune cells in the tumor immune microenvironment was systematically investigated. The correlation between BCL10 expression and infiltrated immune cells was analyzed by immune algorithms such as xCELL, CIBERSORT, QUANTISEQ and MCPcounter using TCGA and GTEx databases. Furthermore, single-cell RNA sequencing data of the cervical squamous cell carcinoma(CESC)microenvironment were analyzed using the GEO database. Moreover, an implanted CESC mice model was established, in which the expression and correlation of BCL10, NF-κB, and PD-1 in CD8+ T cells, as well as the proliferation and apoptosis of CD8+ T cells, were analyzed.Results: In silico analysis revealed that the upregulation of BCL10 in tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) was correlation with decreased infiltration of CD8+T cells, CD4+Th1 cells and NK T cells, and increased infiltration of Treg cells and CD4+Th2 cells in most tumors including CESC. In implanted CESC mice model, BCL10 expression was found upregulated in CD8+T cells, consequently activating the NF-κB signaling, and leading to upregulation of PD-1 expression, inhibiting proliferation of CD8+T cells, and promoting apoptosis of CD8+T cells.Conclusions: BCL10 is closely associated with immunosuppression across various tumor types. In CESC, chronic stimulation and over-activation by tumor antigens result in exhaustion of CD8+ T cells through the over-activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and upregulation of PD-1 expression.