Yan Li

Ms. Yan Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYan Li
Yan Li
ZGZhouzheng Gao
Zhouzheng Gao
QXQiaozhuang Xu
Qiaozhuang Xu
CYCheng YANG
Cheng YANG
Currently, ultra-wide band (UWB) is adopted as a useful high-accuracy positioning technique in satellite-blocked areas. However, UWB’s positioning performance would be limited significantly because of non-line of sight (NLOS) errors. Additionally, the truncation errors in these linearization-based adjustments such as least squares (LS) and extended Kalman filter (EKF) would also visibly degrade UWB positioning accuracy. To overcome the impacts of NLOS errors and truncation errors, this paper introduced a robust-theory-based particle filter (RPF) into UWB positioning. In such a method, the IGG-III model and PF were adopted to limit the impacts of NLOS errors and truncation errors, respectively, by introducing a weight inflation factor and particle group. For comparison, the Bancroft, LS, EKF, unscented Kalman filter (UKF), cubature Kalman filter (CKF), PF, and RPF were also presented. Here, the influences of truncation errors were analyzed by comparing the results based on LS and EKF with those calculated by UKF, CKF, and PF. The impacts of NLOS errors were evaluated by making a comparison between the results of PF and RPF. Results based on a set of simulated UWB data and a group of experiment UWB data demonstrated that the RPF can significantly avoid the positioning errors caused by both truncation errors and NLOS errors. In general, position improvements percentages of 57.2%, 52.7%, 39.6%, 38.2%, 26.6%, and 20.4% can be obtained by RPF compared to those calculated by Bancroft, LS, EKF, UKF, CKF, and PF, respectively. As a comparison, the truncation error would lead to about 8.1%, 10.1%, and 33.2% accuracy decrease in the north, east, and vertical directions on average. Such accuracy-decrease rates caused by NLOS were 6.1%, 5.2%, and 25%.

27 June 2024 in Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYan Li
Yan Li
ZGZhouzheng Gao
Zhouzheng Gao
CYCheng YANG
Cheng YANG
QXQiaozhuang Xu
Qiaozhuang Xu

9 July 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJunhao Liu
Junhao Liu
ZGZhouzheng Gao
Zhouzheng Gao
YLYan Li
Yan Li
SLSiao Lv
Siao Lv
JLJia Liu
Jia Liu
CYCheng YANG
Cheng YANG
With the rapid development of the Internet of Things (IoT), the positioning accuracy requirement of the IoT is increasing, especially for those applications without Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals. Ultra-Wideband (UWB) is treated as a high-accuracy positioning method that can be utilized in GNSS-blocked environments. However, UWB’s performance is still limited when it is applied in practical applications due to errors such as Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) errors, multipath errors, and systematic errors in UWB range values. To constrain the impacts of these mentioned errors on UWB positioning accuracy, this work proposes a novel UWB positioning model by introducing a UWB ranging offset calibration algorithm and a moving average filter into a robust extended Kalman filter. In such a UWB positioning model, the ranging offset calibration algorithm is employed to limit the infuence of UWB systematic errors, and the prior residual-based IGG-III weighting model is used to restrain the impacts of NLOS and multipath errors. The moving average filter is to further decrease the impact of the measuring noise on UWB positioning parameter estimation. To investigate the effectiveness of this proposed method, three sets of UWB experiments are arranged in three classic user environments. The experimental results show that (1) after applying the UWB ranging offset calibration algorithm, UWB positioning accuracies in classic environments, namely indoor condition, outdoor condition, and transition area are increased by 50.3%, 20.2%, and 46.9%, respectively; (2) the moving average filter can effectively improve the smoothness of UWB positioning results in terms of standard deviation; (3) the prior residual-based robust theory brings about 49.4% and 25.2% positioning improvements to horizontal and vertical components under poor measurement quality conditions, but such improvements are rather slight when there are good-quality measurements; and (4) after applying the ranging offset calibration algorithm and moving average filter to the robust EKF together, the elevation accuracy of UWB positioning is increased by 67.1%, 22.2%, and 50.5%, respectively, in the three classic user environments.

29 May 2025 in Measurement Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHShujie Hu
Shujie Hu
ZGZhouzheng Gao
Zhouzheng Gao
CYCheng YANG
Cheng YANG
HWHanyu Wen
Hanyu Wen
YLYan Li
Yan Li
The accuracy and stability of an ultra-wide-band (UWB)-based positioning system would be degraded while suffering from the non-line-of-sight (NLOS) errors and UWB base station distribution significantly. Besides, the linearization of UWB observations could also bring visible linearization errors. To solve these problems, this paper presents a novel tight integration of UWB and the inertial navigation system (INS) (UWB/INS) by integrating the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and an innovation and residual-based IGG-III robust model, which is to limit the impacts of the linearization errors and the NLOS errors. Meanwhile, different base-station distributions are designed to analyze the impact of different base-station distributions on the UWB-based positioning accuracy. Results from both the field test and simulation test demonstrated that (1) the accuracy of the UKF-based UWB/INS tight integration has been improved by 17.32% in the vertical direction, compared to the UWB/INS tight integration based on extended Kalman filter (EKF); (2) the UWB/INS tight integration based on the predicted-residual-based robust UKF can offer about 69.56%, 86.36%, and 73.13% improvements in the north, east, and vertical directions compared to the solutions of the EKF-based UWB/INS tight integration; (3) the geometric distribution and the number of UWB base-stations affect positioning accuracy of the UWB/INS tight integration. The coverage and strength of the UWB base station should be fully considered when the UWB base station is deployed.