Christoph J Zech

Prof. Dr. Christoph J Zech


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2020 in United European Gastroenterology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLuke G Terlouw
Luke G Terlouw
AMAdriaan Moelker
Adriaan Moelker
JAJan Abrahamsen
Jan Abrahamsen
SAStefan Acosta
Stefan Acosta
OBOlaf J Bakker
Olaf J Bakker
MBMarco J Bruno
Marco J Bruno
Chronic mesenteric ischaemia is a severe and incapacitating disease, causing complaints of post‐prandial pain, fear of eating and weight loss. Even though chronic mesenteric ischaemia may progress to acute mesenteric ischaemia, chronic mesenteric ischaemia remains an underappreciated and undertreated disease entity. Probable explanations are the lack of knowledge and awareness among physicians and the lack of a gold standard diagnostic test. The underappreciation of this disease results in diagnostic delays, underdiagnosis and undertreating of patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia, potentially resulting in fatal acute mesenteric ischaemia. This guideline provides a comprehensive overview and repository of the current evidence and multidisciplinary expert agreement on pertinent issues regarding diagnosis and treatment, and provides guidance in the multidisciplinary field of chronic mesenteric ischaemia.

20 March 2014 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CZChristoph J Zech
Christoph J Zech
PKP. Korpraphong
P. Korpraphong
AHA. Huppertz
A. Huppertz
Timm DeneckeTimm Denecke
Timm Denecke
MKM.‐J. Kim
M.‐J. Kim
ABA. Ba‐Ssalamah
A. Ba‐Ssalamah
Background This multicentre international randomized trial compared the impact of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast medium (ECCM‐MRI) and contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CE‐CT) as a first‐line imaging method in patients with suspected colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Methods Between October 2008 and September 2010, patients with suspected CRCLM were randomized to one of the three imaging modalities. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients for whom further imaging after initial imaging was required for a confident diagnosis. Secondary variables included confidence in the therapeutic decision, intraoperative deviations from the initial imaging‐based surgical plan as a result of additional operative findings, and diagnostic efficacy of the imaging modalities versus intraoperative and pathological extent of the disease. Results A total of 360 patients were enrolled. Efficacy was analysed in 342 patients (118, 112 and 112 with gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI, ECCM‐MRI and CE‐CT respectively as the initial imaging procedure). Further imaging was required in 0 of 118, 19 (17·0 per cent) of 112 and 44 (39·3 per cent) of 112 patients respectively (P < 0·001). Diagnostic confidence was high or very high in 98·3 per cent of patients for gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI, 85·7 per cent for ECCM‐MRI and 65·2 per cent for CE‐CT. Surgical plans were changed during surgery in 28, 32 and 47 per cent of patients in the respective groups. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI was better than that of CE‐CT and ECCM‐MRI as the initial imaging modality. No further imaging was needed in the gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI group and comparison of diagnostic efficacy parameters demonstrated the diagnostic superiority of gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI. Registration number: NCT00764621( <!--TODO: clickthrough URL--> http://clinicaltrials.gov ); EudraCT number: 2008‐000583‐16 ( <!--TODO: clickthrough URL--> https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/ ).

5 August 2019 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CZChristoph J Zech
Christoph J Zech
ABAhmed Ba-Ssalamah
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
TBThomas Berg
Thomas Berg
HCHersh Chandarana
Hersh Chandarana
GCGar-Yang Chau
Gar-Yang Chau
DKDow-Mu Koh
Dow-Mu Koh
Objectives The 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), held in Basel, Switzerland, in October 2017, brought together clinical and academic radiologists from around the world to discuss developments in and reach consensus on key issues in the field of gadoxetic acid–enhanced liver MRI since the previous Forum held in 2013. Methods Two main themes in liver MRI were considered in detail at the Forum: the use of gadoxetic acid for contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with liver cirrhosis and the technical performance of gadoxetic acid–enhanced liver MRI, both opportunities and challenges. This article summarises the expert presentations and the delegate voting on consensus statements discussed at the Forum. Results and conclusions It was concluded that gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI has higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), when compared with multidetector CT, by utilising features of hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Recent HCC management guidelines recognise an increasing role for gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in early diagnosis and monitoring post-resection. Additional research is needed to define the role of HBP in predicting microvascular invasion, to better define washout during the transitional phase in gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis, and to reduce the artefacts encountered in the arterial phase. Technical developments are being directed to shortening the MRI protocol for reducing time and patient discomfort and toward utilising faster imaging and non-Cartesian free-breathing approaches that have the potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging. Key Points • Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than CT for diagnosing HCC. • Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI has roles in early-HCC diagnosis and monitoring post-resection response. • Faster imaging and free-breathing approaches have potential to improve multiphasic dynamic imaging.

24 February 2016 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CZChristoph J Zech
Christoph J Zech
NJNahila Justo
Nahila Justo
ALAndrea Lang
Andrea Lang
ABAhmed Ba-Ssalamah
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
MKMyeong-Jin Kim
Myeong-Jin Kim
EJEduard Jonas
Eduard Jonas
Objectives To assess the costs of diagnostic workup and surgery of three strategies for patients with colorectal cancer liver-metastases (CRCLM): gadoxetic-acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast-media (ECCM-MRI) or contrast-enhanced MDCT (CE-MDCT). Methods The within-trial cost evaluation was modelled as a decision-tree to calculate the cost of diagnosis and surgery. The model used clinical outcomes and resource utilization data from a prospective randomized multicentre study. Analyses were performed for the 354-patient safety population from eight participating countries. Results The diagnostic workup cost using Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI upfront resulted in savings compared to ECCM-MRI in all countries except Thailand (difference <2 %). Compared to CE-MDCT, initial imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI was less costly in all countries except Korea and Spain (differences 4 and 8 %, respectively). Significantly more patients in the Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI group were eligible for surgery (39.3 % (48/122) vs. 31.0 % (36/116) and 26.7 % (31/116) for ECCM-MRI and CE-MDCT, respectively), allowing more patients to undergo potentially curative surgery, but resulting in higher treatment costs for the strategy starting with Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI. Conclusions The benefits of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI due to less additional imaging and similar diagnostic workup costs in the three groups suggest that Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI should be the preferred initial imaging procedure to evaluate hepatic resectability in patients with CRCLM. Key Points • Diagnostic imaging cost to evaluate resectability was similar among the groups • Cost for imaging was rather small compared to the cost of surgery • Significantly more patients in the Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI arm were eligible for surgery • Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI is recommended for evaluating hepatic resectability in patients with CRCLM

7 January 2022 in Journal of Digital Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKReinhard Kaufmann
Reinhard Kaufmann
CZChristoph J Zech
Christoph J Zech
MTM. Takes
M. Takes
PBP. Brantner
P. Brantner
Florian Markus ThieringerFlorian Markus Thieringer
Florian Markus Thieringer
MMM. Meissnitzer
M. Meissnitzer
Three-dimensional (3D) printing of vascular structures is of special interest for procedure simulations in Interventional Radiology, but remains due to the complexity of the vascular system and the lack of biological tissue mimicking 3D printing materials a technical challenge. In this study, the technical feasibility, accuracy, and usability of a recently introduced silicone-like resin were evaluated for endovascular procedure simulations and technically compared to a commonly used standard clear resin. Fifty-four vascular models based on twenty-seven consecutive embolization cases were fabricated from preinterventional CT scans and each model was checked for printing success and accuracy by CT-scanning and digital comparison to its original CT data. Median deltas (Δ) of luminal diameters were 0.35 mm for clear and 0.32 mm for flexible resin (216 measurements in total) with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Printing success was 85.2% for standard clear and 81.5% for the novel flexible resin. In conclusion, vascular 3D printing with silicone-like flexible resin was technically feasible and highly accurate. This is the first and largest consecutive case series of 3D-printed embolizations with a novel biological tissue mimicking material and is a promising next step in patient-specific procedure simulations in Interventional Radiology.

4 September 2023 in EBioMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMClaudia Irene Maushart
Claudia Irene Maushart
WSWenfei Sun
Wenfei Sun
AOAlaa Othman
Alaa Othman
AGAdhideb Ghosh
Adhideb Ghosh
JSJaël Rut Senn
Jaël Rut Senn
MBMatthias Johannes Betz
Matthias Johannes Betz
Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely applied anti-inflammatory drugs that are associated with adverse metabolic effects including insulin resistance and weight gain. Previous research indicates that GCs may negatively impact brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity in rodents and humans. We performed a randomised, double-blinded cross-over trial in 16 healthy men (clinicaltrials.govNCT03269747). Participants received 40 mg of prednisone per day for one week or placebo. After a washout period of four weeks, participants crossed-over to the other treatment arm. Primary endpoint was the increase in resting energy expenditure (EE) in response to a mild-cold stimulus (cold-induced thermogenesis, CIT). Secondary outcomes comprised mean 18F-FDG uptake into supraclavicular BAT (SUVmean) as determined by FDG-PET/CT, volume of the BAT depot as well as fat content determined by MRI. The plasma metabolome and the transcriptome of supraclavicular BAT and of skeletal muscle biopsies after each treatment period were analysed. Sixteen participants were recruited to the trial and completed it successfully per protocol. After prednisone treatment resting EE was higher both during warm and cold conditions. However, CIT was similar, 153 kcal/24 h (95% CI 40-266 kcal/24 h) after placebo and 186 kcal/24 h (95% CI 94-277 kcal/24 h, p = 0.38) after prednisone. SUVmean of BAT after cold exposure was not significantly affected by prednisone (3.36 g/ml, 95% CI 2.69-4.02 g/ml, vs 3.07 g/ml, 95% CI 2.52-3.62 g/ml, p = 0.28). Results of plasma metabolomics and BAT transcriptomics corroborated these findings. RNA sequencing of muscle biopsies revealed higher expression of genes involved in calcium cycling. No serious adverse events were reported and adverse events were evenly distributed between the two treatments. Prednisone increased EE in healthy men possibly by altering skeletal muscle calcium cycling. Cold-induced BAT activity was not affected by GC treatment, which indicates that the unfavourable metabolic effects of GCs are independent from thermogenic adipocytes. Grants from Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P3_167823), Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation and from Nora van der Meeuwen-Häfliger Foundation to MJB. A fellowship-grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF211053) to WS. Grants from German Research Foundation (project number: 314061271-TRR 205) and Else Kröner-Fresenius (grant support 2012_A103 and 2015_A228) to MR.