Veronika J. Wirtz

Prof. Veronika J. Wirtz


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
HHHans V Hogerzeil
Hans V Hogerzeil
AGAndrew L Gray
Andrew L Gray
MBMaryam Bigdeli
Maryam Bigdeli
CJCornelis P de Joncheere
Cornelis P de Joncheere
MRMichael R Reich
Michael R Reich

7 November 2016 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJennifer Manne-Goehler
Jennifer Manne-Goehler
CUChukwuemeka A. Umeh
Chukwuemeka A. Umeh
SMSusan P. Montgomery
Susan P. Montgomery
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
In recent years, there has been growing awareness of the significant burden of Chagas disease in the United States (US). However, epidemiological data on both prevalence and access to care for this disease are limited. The objective of this study is to provide an updated national estimate of Chagas disease prevalence, the first state-level estimates of cases of T. cruzi infection in the US and to analyze these estimates in the context of data on confirmed cases of infection in the US blood supply. In this study, we calculated estimates of the state and national prevalence of Chagas disease. The number of residents originally from Chagas disease endemic countries were computed using data on Foreign-Born Hispanic populations from the American Community Survey, along with recent prevalence estimates for Chagas disease in Latin America from the World Health Organization that were published in 2006 and updated in 2015. We then describe the distribution of estimated cases in each state in relation to the number of infections identified in the donated blood supply per data from the AABB (formerly American Association of Blood Banks). The results of this analysis offer an updated national estimate of 238,091 cases of T. cruzi infection in the United States as of 2012, using the same method as was used by Bern and Montgomery to estimate cases in 2005. This estimate indicates that there are 62,070 cases less than the most recent prior estimate, though it does not include undocumented immigrants who may account for as many as 109,000 additional cases. The state level results show that four states (California, Texas, Florida and New York) have over 10,000 cases and an additional seven states have over 5,000 cases. Moreover, since 2007, the AABB has reported 1,908 confirmed cases of T. cruzi infection identified through screening of blood donations. This study demonstrates a substantial burden of Chagas disease in the US, with state variation that reflects the distribution of at risk Latin American immigrant populations. The study lends important new insight into the distribution of this disease in the US and highlights the need for further research quantifying prevalence and incidence to guide interventions for control of Chagas disease across the US. Chagas disease is a parasitic infection that primarily affects poor populations in Latin America. However, awareness of this disease in the United States has increased in recent years. In this study, we utilize data from the American Community Survey and the World Health Organization to estimate the number of cases of Chagas disease in the United States. We find that there are an estimated 238,000 cases across the United States, along with four states that each has over 10,000 cases (California, Texas, New York and Florida). We also analyze data from the United States blood donation which shows that about 1,900 cases have been identified through blood donation. We conclude that there is still a substantial burden of Chagas disease in the US, though the burden is focused in certain geographic regions. We also highlight the need for further research to better quantify prevalence and incidence in order to guide interventions to diagnose and treat patients with Chagas disease across the US.

1 February 2013 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHans V Hogerzeil
Hans V Hogerzeil
JLJonathan Liberman
Jonathan Liberman
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
SKSandeep P Kishore
Sandeep P Kishore
SSSakthi Selvaraj
Sakthi Selvaraj
TSTido von Schoen-Angerer
Tido von Schoen-Angerer

27 February 2019 in BMJ Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCorrina Moucheraud
Corrina Moucheraud
CLCosima Lenz
Cosima Lenz
MLMichaella Latkovic
Michaella Latkovic
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
Introduction The rising burden of diabetes in low- and middle-income countries may cause financial strain on individuals and health systems. This paper presents a systematic review of direct medical costs for diabetes (types 1 and 2) in low- and middle-income countries. Methods Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, databases (PubMed, International Bibliography of Social Science, EconLit) were searched for publications reporting direct medical costs of type 1 and 2 diabetes. Data were extracted from all peer-reviewed papers meeting inclusion criteria, and were standardised into per-patient-visit, per-patient-year and/or per-complication-case costs (2016 US$). Results The search yielded 584 abstracts, and 52 publications were included in the analysis. Most articles were from Asia and Latin America, and most focused on type 2 diabetes. Per-visit outpatient costs ranged from under $5 to over $40 (median: $7); annual inpatient costs ranged from approximately $10 to over $1000 (median: $290); annual laboratory costs ranged from under $5 to over $100 (median: $25); and annual medication costs ranged from $15 to over $500 (median: $177), with particularly wide variation found for insulin. Care for complications was generally high-cost, but varied widely across countries and complication types. Conclusion This review identified substantial variation in diabetes treatment costs; some heterogeneity could be mitigated through improved methods for collecting, analysing and reporting data. Diabetes is a costly disease to manage in low- and middle-income countriesand should be a priority for the global health community seeking to achieve Universal Health Coverage.

24 May 2016 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
WKWarren A. Kaplan
Warren A. Kaplan
GKGene F Kwan
Gene F Kwan
RLRichard O. Laing
Richard O. Laing
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent the highest burden of disease globally. Medicines are a critical intervention used to prevent and treat CVD. This review describes access to medication for CVD from a health system perspective and strategies that have been used to promote access, including providing medicines at lower cost, improving medication supply, ensuring medicine quality, promoting appropriate use, and managing intellectual property issues. Using key evidence in published and gray literature and systematic reviews, we summarize advances in access to cardiovascular medicines using the 5 health system dimensions of access: availability, affordability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of medicines. There are multiple barriers to access of CVD medicines, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Low availability of CVD medicines has been reported in public and private healthcare facilities. When patients lack insurance and pay out of pocket to purchase medicines, medicines can be unaffordable. Accessibility and acceptability are low for medicines used in secondary prevention; increasing use is positively related to country income. Fixed-dose combinations have shown a positive effect on adherence and intermediate outcome measures such as blood pressure and cholesterol. We have a new opportunity to improve access to CVD medicines by using strategies such as efficient procurement of low-cost, quality-assured generic medicines, development of fixed-dose combination medicines, and promotion of adherence through insurance schemes that waive copayment for long-term medications. Monitoring progress at all levels, institutional, regional, national, and international, is vital to identifying gaps in access and implementing adequate policies.

6 January 2017 in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSABINE VOGLER
SABINE VOGLER
VPValérie Paris
Valérie Paris
AFAlessandra Ferrario
Alessandra Ferrario
VWVeronika J. Wirtz
Veronika J. Wirtz
KJKees de Joncheere
Kees de Joncheere
ZBZaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar