Background: The Pharmacovigilance Program of India recommends the use of the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, while many clinicians prefer the Naranjo algorithm for its simplicity. In the present study, we assessed agreement between the two widely used causality assessment scales, that is, the WHO-UMC criteria and the Naranjo algorithm. Materials and Methods: In this study, 842 individual case safety reports were randomly selected from 1000 spontaneously reported forms submitted to the ADR Monitoring Center at a tertiary healthcare Institute in Central India between 2016 and 2018. Two well-trained independent groups performed the causality assessment. One group performed a causality assessment of the 842 ADRs using the WHO-UMC criteria and the other group performed the same using the Naranjo algorithm. The agreement between two ADR causality scales was assessed using the weighted kappa (κ) test. Results: Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) statistical test was applied between the two scales (WHO-UMC scale and Naranjo algorithm) to find out the agreement between these two scales. “No” agreement was found between the two scales {Kappa statistic with 95% confidence interval = 0.048 (P < 0.001)}. Conclusion: There was no agreement found between the WHO-UMC criteria and the Naranjo algorithm in our study.

Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody that prevents activin type II receptors (ActRII) from functioning. This antibody has a higher affinity for muscle activin-2 receptors than natural ligands such as activin and myostatin, which act as negative muscle growth regulators. Blocking the activin receptor with bimagrumab could be a new pharmaceutical approach for managing patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Bimagrumab has anabolic effects on skeletal muscle mass by preventing myostatin binding and other negative muscle growth regulators. Preclinical animal models have also shown that ActRII blockade promotes actions beyond skeletal muscle, including effects on brown adipose tissue (BAT) differentiation and activity. In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, ActRII blockade with bimagrumab led to significant loss of total body fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM) gain, and metabolic improvements over 48 weeks in overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes. The trial involved [number of participants], and the results showed [specific findings]. Currently, Bimagrumab is being evaluated for its potential to treat muscle wasting, functional loss in hip fractures and sarcopenia, as well as obesity. However, it is essential to note that Bimagrumab also blocks the effects of other ActRII ligands, which play a role in the neurohormonal axes, pituitary, gonads, and adrenal glands. These observations suggest that bimagrumab might represent a new approach for treating patients with obesity and related metabolic disturbances.

Azithromycin is an antibiotic commonly used for treating respiratory, gastrointestinal infections besides enteric fever, otitis media etc. It’s convenient short duration oral dosing regimens and good tolerability make it a popular drug in routine outpatient settings in primary to tertiary care. Pre-clinical studies have shown immunomodulatory and in vitro activity of azithromycin against SARS CoV-2, which has led to its widespread usage in COVID-19. However, subsequent reviews of observational studies assessing its efficacy in different grades of COVID-19, as well as data from well conducted randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in mild – moderate COVID-19 have shown no or very low quality evidence of benefit of the drug on various clinical outcome parameters. Still, the drug continues to be used indiscriminately in many parts of India for treatment of home isolated patients of mild COVID-19. Such injudicious use in the community should be stopped, otherwise there will be serious adverse consequences of development of resistance to this very useful antibiotic during this pandemic.

We would like to comment on the ivermectin dose (390 to 470 μg per kilogram of body weight per day) used by Bramante et al. (Aug. 18 issue)¹ in their trial. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of ivermectin has been found to be approximately 2.5 μmol per liter, which corresponds to plasma concentrations that are 50 to 100 times as high as the highest concentration in plasma after a single dose of 200 μg per kilogram. Thus, the effective therapeutic dose of ivermectin may be 10 times as high as that permitted.² An in vitro study of niclosamide plus ivermectin showed greater efficacy against SARS-CoV-2: the use of the drugs in combination decreased the IC₅₀ values by up to a factor of 4 relative to the values for each drug alone. This combination may be worth considering for investigation.³