Marcelo Sanmartín

Dr. Marcelo Sanmartín

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2014 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SWStephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker
PKPhilippe Kolh
Philippe Kolh
FAFernando Alfonso
Fernando Alfonso
JCJean-Philippe Collet
Jean-Philippe Collet
JCJochen Cremer
Jochen Cremer
JDJohn Davies
John Davies

29 August 2014 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PKPhilippe Kolh
Philippe Kolh
SWStephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker
FAFernando Alfonso
Fernando Alfonso
JCJean-Philippe Collet
Jean-Philippe Collet
JCJochen Cremer
Jochen Cremer
OWOlaf Wendler
Olaf Wendler
Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence, at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines and recommendations should help health professionals to make decisions in their daily practice; however, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s), in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.

1 March 2008 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJosé M. de la Torre-Hernández
José M. de la Torre-Hernández
FAFernando Alfonso
Fernando Alfonso
FHFelipe Hernández
Felipe Hernández
JEJaime Elizaga
Jaime Elizaga
MSMarcelo Sanmartín
Marcelo Sanmartín
JMJosepa Mauri
Josepa Mauri

3 January 2007 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarcelo Sanmartín
Marcelo Sanmartín
MGMonica Gomez
Monica Gomez
JRJose Ramon Rumoroso
Jose Ramon Rumoroso
MSMario Sadaba
Mario Sadaba
MMMaite Martinez
Maite Martinez
AIAndres Iniguez
Andres Iniguez

1 September 2007 in The American Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarcelo Sanmartín
Marcelo Sanmartín
JBJosé Antonio Baz
José Antonio Baz
RCRamon Claro
Ramon Claro
VAVanesa Asorey
Vanesa Asorey
DDDarío Durán
Darío Durán
AIAndrés Iñiguez
Andrés Iñiguez

6 November 2007 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJuan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico
Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico
JZJosé Luis Zamorano
José Luis Zamorano
EPElsa Prieto-Moriche
Elsa Prieto-Moriche
RHRosa Ana Hernández-Antolín
Rosa Ana Hernández-Antolín
MBMarisol Bravo-Amaro
Marisol Bravo-Amaro
AÍAndrés Íñiguez-Romo
Andrés Íñiguez-Romo
The aim of the study was to validate a novel formula for aortic area, based on the principle of continuity equation (CE), that substitutes Doppler-derived stroke volume (SV) by SV directly measured with real-time three-dimensional (RT3D) echo and semi-automated border detection. RT3D has proved outstanding accuracy for left ventricular volume calculation. So far, however, neither this potential has been applied to haemodynamic assessment, nor RT3D has succeeded in the evaluation of aortic valve disease. Aortic area was measured in 41 patients with aortic stenosis using Gorlin's equation, Hakki's formula, Doppler CE, two-dimensional Simpson's volumetric method, and by the novel RT3D method. RT3D has the best linear association and absolute agreement with Gorlin of all non-invasive methods r = 0.902, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.846, better than CE (r = 0.646, ICC = 0.626) and two-dimensional volumetric method (r = 0.627, ICC = 0.378). Linear and Passing–Bablok regression show that RT3D fits better to Gorlin (r2 = 0.814) than CE (r2 = 0.417) and two-dimensional method (r2 = 0.393). Its accuracy is comparable to Hakki's formula, routinely employed in catheter laboratories. Inter- and intraobserver agreements (ICC) were, respectively, 0.732 and 0.985, better than CE (0.662, 0.857). RT3D also grades most efficiently the severity of aortic stenosis as mild, moderate, or severe (weighted kappa = 0.932). RT3D underestimates aortic area (95% CI 0.084–0.193). ROC curves, however, show that the optimal cutoff point to consider aortic stenosis severity remains close to 1 cm2 (1.06 cm2). RT3D is more accurate than CE and than two-dimensional volumetric methods to calculate area and to grade the severity of aortic stenosis. Area obtained by three-dimensional echo is slightly underestimated, but its range is clinically negligible.