Sexual minority men (SMM) are disproportionately affected by HIV. Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective way of reducing HIV incidence, PrEP use has remained relatively low. Social support may be one effective factor in increasing PrEP use among SMM, but the association between social support and PrEP use/adherence is not well understood. The objective of this paper was to summarize the current literature on the association of social support and PrEP use among SMM in the United States. A systematic search was conducted using six different databases MEDLINE / PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science using terms established from keywords and medical subject headings (MeSH) terms before being adapted to each database. Data were extracted for key study factors (e.g., study population, geographic location, study design) and main findings. This search produced eleven articles: ten manuscripts and one conference Of these, two were randomized control trials, two were interventions, three were qualitative, and four were cross-sectional. The studies were widespread across the country, but most were in major metropolitan areas. From the articles included in this review, findings were inconsistent in the association between social support; some studies showed null findings, others that only certain sources of social support were significant, and others that there was a significant association between social support and PrEP use. This review highlights the complexity of the relationship between social support and PrEP use among SMM, indicating the need for further research to identify specific types and sources of support that effectively enhance PrEP uptake and adherence. Targeted interventions based on these insights could significantly reduce HIV incidence in the population.

Black sexual minority men (BSMM) continue to bear a disproportionate burden of HIV in the United States, with the highest incidence and prevalence in the southern region of the country. In Texas, BSMM living with HIV (BSMM+) have the lowest rates of viral suppression of all SMM and have lower antiretroviral treatment (ART) adherence than white and Hispanic SMM. Long-acting injectable ART (LAI-ART) can potentially overcome several barriers to daily oral ART adherence (e.g., stigma, forgetfulness, pill fatigue). However, little is known about the knowledge, willingness, barriers, and facilitators regarding LAI-ART among BSMM+. From July 2022 to September 2023, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 27 BSMM+ from the Houston and Dallas Metropolitan Areas, Texas. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Most men knew about LAI-ART, but their understanding varied based on their existing sources of information. Some men were enthusiastic, some were cautious, and some reported no interest in LAI-ART. Barriers to LAI-ART included a lack of public insurance coverage of LAI-ART; fear of needles and side effects; the frequency of injection visits; the requirement of viral suppression before switching from oral ART to LAI-ART; and satisfaction with oral daily ART. Motivators of LAI-ART uptake included the eliminated burden of daily pills and reduced anxiety about possibly missing doses. BSMM+ may be among those who could most benefit from LAI-ART, though more research is needed to understand which factors influence their willingness and how the barriers to LAI-ART might be addressed, particularly among diverse communities of SMM of color.

Background: Black sexual minority men (BSMM) in the Southern region of the United States experience a disproportionate burden of HIV. Research findings suggest that having supportive patient-provider relationships are critical for sustained HIV care engagement. The present study explores the role of supportive healthcare providers in the care engagement among BSMM living with HIV (BSMM+) in the US South. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with BSMM+ in Texas (n=27) to explore perceived barriers and facilitators of sustained care engagement. Interviews lasted 60 minutes on average, were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Findings: Participants described how important having relationships with engaged and supportive HIV care and service providers is to sustained engagement in care and positive HIV clinical outcomes. Supportive providers were characterized as non-judgmental, meeting patients’ needs, and making patients feel “seen”. Less supportive providers were described as making their patients “feel like a number” and having lack of follow through on proposed support and resources. Supportive providers were associated with increased care engagement of their patients while less supportive providers often led to patients switching providers, losing touch with services, and getting off track with their care. Discussion: We found that among BSMM+ an important facilitator of sustained care engagement was having positive, affirming, and knowledgeable healthcare providers, while negative and dismissive experiences with providers was a notable barrier to care engagement. This work highlights the need for a scale up of comprehensive, ongoing trainings in patient-centered and person-first communication for providers. Further, manageable provider caseloads can facilitate more thorough patient interactions where tailored HIV care and education can be provided in a safe and non-judgmental environment. Plain Language Summary: Black sexual minority men in the Southern region of the United States experience a disproportionate burden of HIV. While the role of patient-provider relationships for HIV care engagement has been shown in some contexts, less is known about the specific role of supportive healthcare providers in the care engagement among Black sexual minority men living with HIV in the United States South.Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted among Black sexual minority men living with HIV in Texas (n=27) to explore perceived barriers and facilitators of sustained care engagement.We found that supportive providers were associated with increased care engagement of their patients while less supportive providers often led to patients switching providers, losing touch with services, and getting off track with their care. Our findings suggest the need for a scale up of comprehensive, ongoing trainings in patient-centered and person-first communication for providers.

Background: Black sexual minority men (BSMM) are disproportionately affected by HIV incidence and have lower rates of HIV care engagement (e.g., retention in care, viral suppression), particularly in the US South. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated co-occurring psychosocial syndemic factors (e.g., depression, violence, substance use) that disproportionately impact BSMM living with HIV (BSMM+), but the impact of the pandemic on HIV care engagement among BSMM+ in the US South has not been explored in depth. Methods: BSMM+ (n = 27) were recruited from a longitudinal cohort in Dallas and Houston, Texas. Participants with less-than-optimal HIV care engagement, previous experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV), and prevalence of self-reported substance use were purposively selected for in-depth interviews from June 2022 to August 2023. Interviews lasted 54 min on average and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and de-identified before applying a thematic analysis approach. Results: Over half of participants experienced a relationship with IPV, used illicit substances in the past 60 days, and were depressed. Interviews highlighted that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, heightened levels of depression, substance use, and IPV individually and synergistically inhibited ART adherence and HIV care engagement. Participants described how IPV served to worsen their mental health and substance use, which, in turn, were the core drivers of poor HIV care engagement. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the syndemics of IPV, mental health, and substance use, and these acted as barriers to HIV care engagement. Future adherence interventions should synergistically address syndemic factors to maximize effectiveness.

Youth experiencing homelessness and housing instability (YEH) face disproportionate health risks and structural barriers to health equity, which were intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a community-based participatory research study with 21 adolescents (ages 13–17) and transitional-aged youth (ages 18–26) experiencing homelessness or housing instability in San Diego, California, USA. Between February and July 2023, we conducted six “arts-based engagement sessions” (5 in English, 1 in Spanish) that blended expressive arts and focus group approaches to examine how YEH accessed, evaluated, and applied health information, and how trust and material and structural resource constraints shaped engagement with COVID-19 information and prevention guidance. We analyzed data via applied thematic analysis. Participants described how COVID-19 restrictions and economic disruption amplified pre-existing housing precarity, worsening material conditions and mental health. Participants selectively trusted COVID-19 information based on who provided it, how credible it felt, and whether it aligned with their lived experiences. Community-based providers and, for some, churches and cultural or ancestral knowledge were key information sources. Trust in government and public health messaging was conditional and shaped by perceptions of credibility, coherence, and political motivation. Participants described information overload and rapidly changing guidance as overwhelming and often incompatible with their material realities, leading to disengagement, reliance on intuition, or deprioritization of prevention behaviors. Effective communication during future health emergencies must center trusted relational messengers, align guidance with lived realities, and address the structural conditions that shape whether health information can be meaningfully acted upon.