Measuring albuminuria is the preferred method for defining and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), but total urine protein or dipstick protein is often measured instead. This analysis presents eq... Visual Converting Urine PCR to Urine ACR Measuring albuminuria is the preferred method for defining and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), but total urine protein or dipstick protein is... Background: Although measuring albuminuria is the preferred method for defining and staging chronic kidney disease (CKD), total urine protein or dipstick protein is often measured instead. Objectiv...

Significance Statement: Declining rates of acute rejection (AR) and the very high rate of 1-year graft survival among patients with AR has led some clinicians and researchers to reconsider the importance of AR as a primary outcome in clinical trials or in patients. The authors examine the association of AR within 6 months of kidney transplant with long-term outcomes of transplant recipients, using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry between 1997 and 2017. Recipients with early AR were more likely to experience graft loss attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.56) and recurrent AR (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46). Recipients with early AR were also more likely to die from cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.53) or cancer (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.64). AR therefore remains an important short-term outcome in kidney transplantation with significant long-term effects. Background: Declining rates of acute rejection (AR) and the high rate of 1-year graft survival among patients with AR have prompted re-examination of AR as an outcome in the clinic and in trials. Yet AR and its treatment may directly or indirectly affect longer-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. Methods: To understand the long-term effect of AR on outcomes, we analyzed data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, including 13,614 recipients of a primary kidney-only transplant between 1997 and 2017 with at least 6 months of graft function. The associations between AR within 6 months post-transplant and subsequent cause-specific graft loss and death were determined using Cox models adjusted for baseline donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics. Results: AR occurred in 2906 recipients (21.4%) and was associated with graft loss attributed to chronic allograft nephropathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.56) and recurrent AR beyond month 6 (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46). Early AR was also associated with death with a functioning graft (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.36), and with death due to cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.53) and cancer (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.64). Sensitivity analyses restricted to subgroups with either biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated, or vascular rejection, or stratified by treatment response produced similar results. Conclusions: AR is associated with increased risks of longer-term graft failure and death, particularly death from cardiovascular disease and cancer. The results suggest AR remains an important short-term outcome to monitor in kidney transplantation and clinical trials.

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual’s suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate’s profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence. The strengths of recommendations are provided in the full report. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Kidney transplantation offers improved survival and quality of life compared to dialysis for most recipients; however, benefits for elderly patients (>70 years) remain uncertain. Using the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (2009-2019), elderly transplant recipients were matched to a waitlisted dialysis patient by age, cause of end-stage kidney disease, and dialysis duration (paired controls). We censored dialysis patients at the time of transplant. Survival was compared using stratified Cox regression. Elderly transplant recipients (KTRs) (n = 465) were matched to waitlisted pairs. Transplant group mortality initially exceeded dialysis due to excess infection-related deaths (1.9 transplant versus 0.3 dialysis/100 patient-years, P = .03). Beyond month 9, a progressive survival benefit in favor of transplantation was apparent. Over a median follow-up of 1.7 years, mortality was 38% lower for KTRs (95% confidence interval 0.41-0.94, P = .02), and 5-year survival was 80% KTRs vs 53% dialysis (P < .001). Recipients of living and standard criteria donor kidneys acquired immediate survival advantage compared with dialysis, while recipients of expanded criteria donor's kidneys experienced elevated risk of death for the first 17 months. Compared with remaining on dialysis, elderly KTRs incur an increased risk of early posttransplant mortality but thereafter may anticipate progressively superior survival rates.

Secretory IgA is a key mucosal component ensuring host-microbiota mutualism. Here we use nutritional geometry modelling in mice fed 10 different macronutrient-defined, isocaloric diets, and identify dietary protein as the major driver of secretory IgA production. Protein-driven secretory IgA induction is not mediated by T-cell-dependent pathways or changes in gut microbiota composition. Instead, the microbiota of high protein fed mice produces significantly higher quantities of extracellular vesicles, compared to those of mice fed high-carbohydrate or high-fat diets. These extracellular vesicles activate Toll-like receptor 4 to increase the epithelial expression of IgA-inducing cytokine, APRIL, B cell chemokine, CCL28, and the IgA transporter, PIGR. We show that succinate, produced in high concentrations by microbiota of high protein fed animals, increases generation of reactive oxygen species by bacteria, which in turn promotes extracellular vesicles production. Here we establish a link between dietary macronutrient composition, gut microbial extracellular vesicles release and host secretory IgA response.

Activation of TLR2 or TLR4 by endogenous ligands such as high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) may mediate inflammation causing diabetic kidney injury. We determined whether blockade of HMGB1 signaling by: (1) supra-physiological production of endogenous secretory Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (esRAGE), a receptor for HMGB1; (2) administration of HMGB1 A Box, a specific competitive antagonist, would inhibit development of streptozotocin induced diabetic nephropathy (DN). Wild-type diabetic mice developed albuminuria, glomerular injuries, interstitial fibrosis and renal inflammation. Using an adeno-associated virus vector, systemic over-expression of esRAGE afforded significant protection from all parameters. No protection was achieved by a control vector which expressed human serum albumin. Administration of A Box was similarly protective against development of DN. To determine the mechanism(s) of protection, we found that whilst deficiency of TLR2, TLR4 or RAGE afforded partial protection from development of DN, over-expression of esRAGE provided additional protection in TLR2^−/−, modest protection against podocyte damage only in TLR4^−/− and no protection in RAGE^−/− diabetic mice, suggesting the protection provided by esRAGE was primarily through interruption of RAGE and TLR4 pathways. We conclude that strategies to block the interaction between HMGB1 and its receptors may be effective in preventing the development of DN.