Background: There is no consensus on whether mechanical alignment (MA) or kinematic alignment (KA) should be chosen for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) Type I with a varus arithmetic HKA (aHKA) and apex distal joint line obliquity (JLO). The aim of this study was to investigate whether MA or KA is preferable for soft tissue balancing in TKA for this phenotype. Method: This prospective cohort study included 64 knees with CPAK Type I osteoarthritis that had undergone cruciate-retaining TKA. Using optical tracking software, we simulated implant placement in the Mako system before making the actual bone cut and compared the results between MA and KA. Extension balance (the difference between medial and lateral gaps in extension) and medial balance (the difference in medial gaps in flexion and extension) were examined. These gap differences within 2 mm were defined as good balance. Achievement of overall balance was defined as an attainment of good extension and medial balance. The incidence of balance in each patient was compared with an independent sample ratio test. Results: Compared with the MA group, the KA group achieved better soft tissue balance in extension balance (p < 0.001). A total of 75% of the patients in the KA group achieved overall balance, which was greater than the 38% achieved in the MA group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In robot-assisted TKA for CPAK Type I osteoarthritis, KA achieved knee balance during extension without soft tissue release in a greater percentage of patients than MA.

Objectives: Hamstring strain injuries are common in elite athletes and affect return-to-sport timelines. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold-standard method for assessing injury severity, ultrasonography (US) is a more accessible and cost-effective alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between US and MRI in the diagnosis of hamstring injuries and their prognostic value in predicting recovery. Methods: This retrospective study included elite athletes who sustained acute first-time hamstring strains and underwent both MRI and US within five days after injury. The injuries were classified according to location (muscle belly, musculotendinous junction, or tendon) and severity (modified Peetron’s classification). The agreement between the imaging findings and return-to-sports timelines was analyzed. Results: US demonstrated a 70% agreement with MRI in identifying injury locations, showing the highest concordance for muscle belly injuries (90%), followed by musculotendinous junction (80%) injuries, but a lower accuracy for tendon injuries (60%). Recovery times differed significantly by location and severity (p < 0.01), with tendon grade 3 injuries requiring the longest recovery (383 days) and muscle belly injuries requiring the shortest recovery (16 days). Musculotendinous junction grade 2, tendon grade 1, and tendon grade 2 injuries had similar recovery durations (57–65 days). Conclusions: High-resolution US is a reliable diagnostic tool for muscle belly and musculotendinous junction injuries. However, MRI remains essential for high-grade tendon injuries. US serves as the first-line imaging modality, with MRI reserved for cases that require a detailed prognostic assessment. These findings provide guidance for optimizing imaging strategies for hamstring injury management.

Background/Objectives: Hamstring strain injuries are common in elite athletes and affect return-to-sport timeline. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for assessing injury severity, ultrasonography (US) is a more accessible and cost-effective alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between US and MRI in the diagnosis of hamstring injuries and their prognostic value in predicting recovery. Methods: This retrospective study included elite athletes with acute first-time hamstring strains who underwent both MRI and US within five days after injury. The injuries were classified according to location (muscle belly, musculotendi-nous junction, or tendon) and severity (modified Peetrons classification). The agree-ment between imaging findings and return-to-sport timelines was analyzed. Results: US demonstrated 70% agreement with MRI in identifying injury locations, with the highest concordance for muscle belly (90%) and musculotendinous junction (80%) in-juries but lower accuracy for tendons (60%). Recovery times differed significantly by location and severity (p < 0.01), with tendon grade 3 injuries requiring the longest re-covery (383 days), while muscle belly injuries had the shortest recovery (16 days). Musculotendinous junction grade 2, tendon grade 1, and tendon grade 2 injuries had similar recovery durations (57–65 days). Conclusions: High-resolution US is a reliable diagnostic tool for muscle belly and musculotendinous junction injuries; however, MRI remains essential for high-grade tendon injuries. US serves as a first-line imaging mo-dality, with MRI reserved for cases that require a detailed prognostic assessment. These findings provide guidance for optimizing imaging strategies for hamstring inju-ry management.