Matthew Kendall Hoffman

Dr. Matthew Kendall Hoffman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew Kendall Hoffman
Matthew Kendall Hoffman
SGShivaprasad S Goudar
Shivaprasad S Goudar
BKBhalachandra S Kodkany
Bhalachandra S Kodkany
MMMrityunjay Metgud
Mrityunjay Metgud
MSManjunath S Somannavar
Manjunath S Somannavar
DWDennis Wallace
Dennis Wallace

1 April 2015 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DHDavid M. Haas
David M. Haas
CPCorette B. Parker
Corette B. Parker
DWDeborah A. Wing
Deborah A. Wing
SPSamuel Parry
Samuel Parry
WGWilliam A. Grobman
William A. Grobman
URUma M. Reddy
Uma M. Reddy
The primary aim of the "Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be" is to determine maternal characteristics, which include genetic, physiologic response to pregnancy, and environmental factors that predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nulliparous women in the first trimester of pregnancy were recruited into an observational cohort study. Participants were seen at 3 study visits during pregnancy and again at delivery. We collected data from in-clinic interviews, take-home surveys, clinical measurements, ultrasound studies, and chart abstractions. Maternal biospecimens (serum, plasma, urine, cervicovaginal fluid) at antepartum study visits and delivery specimens (placenta, umbilical cord, cord blood) were collected, processed, and stored. The primary outcome of the study was defined as pregnancy ending at <37+0 weeks' gestation. Key study hypotheses involve adverse pregnancy outcomes of spontaneous preterm birth, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. We recruited 10,037 women to the study. Basic characteristics of the cohort at screening are reported. The "Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be" cohort study methods and procedures can help investigators when they plan future projects.

1 June 2011 in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew Kendall Hoffman
Matthew Kendall Hoffman
JBJennifer L. Bailit
Jennifer L. Bailit
DBD. Ware Branch
D. Ware Branch
RBRonald T. Burkman
Ronald T. Burkman
PVPaul Van Veldhusien
Paul Van Veldhusien
JZJun Zhang
Jun Zhang
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of obstetric maneuvers for resolving shoulder dystocia and the effect that these maneuvers have on neonatal injury when shoulder dystocia occurs. METHODS: Using an electronic database encompassing 206,969 deliveries, we identified all women with a vertex fetus beyond 34 0/7 weeks of gestation who incurred a shoulder dystocia during the process of delivery. Women whose fetuses had a congenital anomaly and women with an antepartum stillbirth were excluded. Medical records of all cases were reviewed by trained abstractors. Cases involving neonatal injury (defined as brachial plexus injury, clavicular or humerus fracture, or hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy or intrapartum neonatal death attributed to the shoulder dystocia) were compared with those without injury. RESULTS: Among 132,098 women who delivered a term cephalic liveborn fetus vaginally, 2,018 incurred a shoulder dystocia (1.5%), and 101 (5.2%) of these incurred a neonatal injury. Delivery of the posterior shoulder was associated with the highest rate of delivery when compared with other maneuvers (84.4% compared with 24.3–72.0% for other maneuvers; P<.005 to P<.001) and similar rates of neonatal injury (8.4% compared with 6.1–14.0%; P=.23 to P=.7). The total number of maneuvers performed significantly correlated with the rate of neonatal injury (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Delivery of the posterior shoulder should be considered following the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure in the management of shoulder dystocia. The need for additional maneuvers was associated with higher rates of neonatal injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

1 June 2015 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAmanda Roman
Amanda Roman
BRBurton Rochelson
Burton Rochelson
NFNathan S. Fox
Nathan S. Fox
MHMatthew Kendall Hoffman
Matthew Kendall Hoffman
VBVincenzo Berghella
Vincenzo Berghella
AFAdiel Fleischer
Adiel Fleischer

1 May 2016 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGeorge R. Saade
George R. Saade
KBKim A. Boggess
Kim A. Boggess
SSScott A. Sullivan
Scott A. Sullivan
GMGlenn R. Markenson
Glenn R. Markenson
JIJay D. Iams
Jay D. Iams
DHDurlin E. Hickok
Durlin E. Hickok
Preterm delivery remains the leading cause of perinatal mortality. Risk factors and biomarkers have traditionally failed to identify the majority of preterm deliveries. To develop and validate a mass spectrometry-based serum test to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in asymptomatic pregnant women. A total of 5501 pregnant women were enrolled between 17(0/7) and 28(6/7) weeks gestational age in the prospective Proteomic Assessment of Preterm Risk study at 11 sites in the United States between 2011 and 2013. Maternal blood was collected at enrollment and outcomes collected following delivery. Maternal serum was processed by a proteomic workflow, and proteins were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. The discovery and verification process identified 2 serum proteins, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (IBP4) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), as predictors of spontaneous preterm delivery. We evaluated a predictor using the log ratio of the measures of IBP4 and SHBG (IBP4/SHBG) in a clinical validation study to classify spontaneous preterm delivery cases (<37(0/7) weeks gestational age) in a nested case-control cohort different from subjects used in discovery and verification. Strict blinding and independent statistical analyses were employed. The predictor had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.75 and sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. The IBP4/SHBG predictor at this sensitivity and specificity had an odds ratio of 5.04 for spontaneous preterm delivery. Accuracy of the IBP4/SHBG predictor increased using earlier case-vs-control gestational age cutoffs (eg, <35(0/7) vs ≥35(0/7) weeks gestational age). Importantly, higher-risk subjects defined by the IBP4/SHBG predictor score generally gave birth earlier than lower-risk subjects. A serum-based molecular predictor identifies asymptomatic pregnant women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, which may provide utility in identifying women at risk at an early stage of pregnancy to allow for clinical intervention. This early detection would guide enhanced levels of care and accelerate development of clinical strategies to prevent preterm delivery.

16 December 2018 in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPStefanie Parks
Stefanie Parks
MHMatthew Kendall Hoffman
Matthew Kendall Hoffman
SGSHIVAPRASAD Shivaprasad GOUDAR
SHIVAPRASAD Shivaprasad GOUDAR
APArchana Patel
Archana Patel
SSSarah Saleem
Sarah Saleem
RDRichard J. Derman
Richard J. Derman