Katie Pinner

Mrs. Katie Pinner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2020 in Postgraduate Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMargaret Moline
Margaret Moline
GZGary Zammit
Gary Zammit
JYJane Yardley
Jane Yardley
KPKatie Pinner
Katie Pinner
DKDinesh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
JCJocelyn Y. Cheng
Jocelyn Y. Cheng
Residual next-day effects of sleep-promoting drugs are common and an important safety issue. Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in the United States and Japan for treatment o...

7 February 2022 in Sleep Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TRThomas Roth
Thomas Roth
RRRussell Rosenberg
Russell Rosenberg
CMCharles M. Morin
Charles M. Morin
JYJane Yardley
Jane Yardley
KPKatie Pinner
Katie Pinner
MMMargaret Moline
Margaret Moline
Evaluate changes in insomnia severity in subjects with moderate to severe insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score ≥15) treated for 12 months nightly with lemborexant. This phase 3 randomized study comprised two 6-month treatment periods. In Period 1, 949 subjects were randomized to placebo, lemborexant 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). In Period 2, placebo subjects were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10; subjects initially randomized to lemborexant continued their assigned treatment. Insomnia severity was assessed using baseline ISI and 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month post-treatment scores. Mean ISI scores improved significantly across treatment groups and disease severities, with greater decreases from baseline in the LEM5 and LEM10 versus placebo groups at months 1 (-7.1, -7.2, -5.2, respectively), 3 (-8.6, -8.9, -6.1, respectively), and 6 (-9.9, -9.8, -7.2 respectively); ISI score improvements were maintained with LEM5 and LEM10 at months 9 (-11.1 and -11.2, respectively) and 12 (-11.5 and -11.2, respectively). At months 1, 3, and 6, significantly more treatment responders (≥7-point ISI score decrease from baseline) were observed with LEM5 (44%-57%) and LEM10 (44%-52%) versus placebo (30%-41%). At months 1, 3, and 6, more remitters (ISI total score <10 and < 8) were observed with LEM5 (30%-44% and 22%-34%, respectively) and LEM10 (31%-41% and 22%-31%, respectively) versus placebo (18%-28% and 11%-21%, respectively). Lemborexant significantly reduced insomnia severity for 12 months and increased clinically meaningful response and remission rates versus placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39.

20 March 2022 in Postgraduate Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCCraig Chepke
Craig Chepke
RJRakesh Jain
Rakesh Jain
RRRussell Rosenberg
Russell Rosenberg
MMMargaret Moline
Margaret Moline
JYJane Yardley
Jane Yardley
MMManoj Malhotra
Manoj Malhotra
Fatigue is a common symptom in patients with insomnia. This analysis evaluated whether treatment of nighttime symptoms of insomnia with a dual orexin receptor antagonist, lemborexant, might also re...

24 March 2022 in Sleep Medicine: X
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ADAmitabh Dash
Amitabh Dash
KPKatie Pinner
Katie Pinner
YIYuichi Inoue
Yuichi Inoue
KHKenichi Hayashida
Kenichi Hayashida
SLSung Chul Lim
Sung Chul Lim
MMMargaret Moline
Margaret Moline
Lemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved for treating adults with insomnia. We analyzed the efficacy (subjective sleep outcomes) and safety of LEM over 12 months in the subgroup of Asian subjects from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303). Study 303 was a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled (first 6 months), double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study of adults with insomnia disorder. During the 6-month Period 1, subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, LEM 5 mg (LEM5), or LEM 10 mg (LEM10); LEM subjects continued treatment in the following 6-month Period 2. Outcome measures included subject-reported (subjective) sleep onset latency (sSOL), sleep efficiency (sSE), wake after sleep onset (sWASO), total sleep time (sTST), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Global Impression–Insomnia version (PGI-I). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Overall, 178 Asian subjects (Japanese, n = 161; Chinese, n = 4; other Asian, n = 13) were included. Greater decreases in sSOL and sWASO and increases in sSE and sTST from baseline were observed with LEM vs placebo at 6 months; LEM benefits were sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases in ISI total score were seen with LEM vs placebo at 6 months; improvements from baseline with LEM continued through 12 months. For each PGI-I item, LEM-treated subjects had more positive medication effects than placebo-treated subjects at 6 months; these effects were maintained with LEM in Period 2. TEAEs were generally mild to moderate. LEM improved subjective sleep parameters and was well-tolerated in Asian subjects with insomnia disorder over 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39.

20 June 2023 in Menopause
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Masakazu TerauchiMasakazu Terauchi
Masakazu Terauchi
JCJocelyn Y. Cheng
Jocelyn Y. Cheng
JYJane Yardley
Jane Yardley
KPKatie Pinner
Katie Pinner
MMMargaret Moline
Margaret Moline
EPElizabeth Pappadopulos
Elizabeth Pappadopulos
Objective: Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2). Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder (N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: The midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were −17.9, −20.7, and − 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were −37.0 (59.6), −50.1 (74.5), and −54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions: Consistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia.

4 December 2024 in Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAndrew Krystal
Andrew Krystal
PBPierre Blier
Pierre Blier
LCLarry Culpepper
Larry Culpepper
ANAndrew A. Nierenberg
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Yoshikazu TakaesuYoshikazu Takaesu
Yoshikazu Takaesu
JYJane Yardley
Jane Yardley
Aim: Individuals with insomnia frequently have comorbid depression or anxiety. This study sought to provide a preliminary indication of the effects of lemborexant (LEM) in subjects treated for mild depression/anxiety symptoms. Methods: E2006‐G000‐303 (NCT02952820; EudraCT 2015‐001463‐39; SUNRISE‐2) was a 12‐month, phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study where subjects with insomnia disorder were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, LEM 5 mg (LEM5), or LEM 10 mg (LEM10) for 6 months. During the second 6 months (not reported), placebo‐treated subjects were re‐randomized to LEM5 or LEM10. In this post hoc analysis, changes from baseline (CFB) in subject‐reported (subjective) sleep onset latency (sSOL), sleep efficiency (sSE), wake after sleep onset (sWASO), total sleep time (sTST), Fatigue Severity Scale, and Insomnia Severity Index were evaluated in subjects treated with medications for symptoms of depression/anxiety (subpopulation). Results: Of 949 randomized subjects, 61 treated with medications for symptoms of depression/anxiety were included. In the subpopulation, CFB comparing LEM with placebo were generally smaller than the overall population due to a larger placebo response in the subpopulation. However, the magnitudes of CFB within the active treatment groups for sSOL, sWASO, sTST, and sSE were similar between the subpopulation and the overall population. No new safety signals were observed in the subpopulation. Conclusion: LEM treatment benefited subjects with insomnia treated with medications for depression/anxiety symptoms, with no new safety signals. A greater placebo response in the subpopulation than in the overall population decreased the drug versus placebo effect size for LEM, as has been reported for other insomnia medications.