Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects about 3% of the world's population, with the highest prevalence in individuals under 40. The prevalence in pregnant women varies with geographical distribution (highest in developing countries). Prevalence also increases in sub-populations of women at high risk for blood-transmitted infections. HCV infection in pregnancy represents a non-negligible problem. However, most of the past antiviral regimens cannot be routinely offered to pregnant or breastfeeding women because of their side effects. We briefly reviewed the issue of treatment of HCV infection in pregnant/breastfeeding women focusing on the effects of the new direct-acting antivirals on fertility, pregnancy and lactation in animal studies and on the potential risk for humans based on the pharmacokinetic properties of each drug. Currently, all new therapy regimens are contraindicated in this setting because of lack of sufficient safety information and adequate measures of contraception are still routinely recommended for female patients of childbearing potential.
1 August 2019 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
The coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) has overwhelmed like a shock wave in a completely unprepared world. Despite coronavirus infections were involved in previous epidemic outbreaks, no antiviral agent was developed for specific treatment. As a consequence, since the beginning of this pandemic, both repositioned and experimental drugs were used to treat the infected patients without evidence of clinical efficacy. Just based on experience coming from the use of antiviral agents to treat other viruses (eg, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir) and supposed antiviral or immunomodulatory activities of drugs with no approved antiviral indications (eg hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab), clinicians have faced the ongoing pandemic. Currently, after about 9 months from the COVID-19 spread, there is still no antiviral agent capable of ensuring the cure of this syndrome. Clinical trials are beginning to confirm the benefits of some drugs, while for other compounds, efficacy and safety have not yet been confirmed. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) have denied or downsized the beneficial effects attributed to certain molecules, such as aminoquinolines, largely used in clinical practice at the beginning of COVID-19 spread. Conversely, at the same time, they have provided evidence for unexpected effectiveness of other agents that have been underutilized, such as steroids, which were not used in SARS treatment because of the threatened effect on viral replication. Evidence deriving from pathologic studies have demonstrated that the prothrombotic effects of SARS-CoV-2 can be prevented by heparin prophylaxis, underlining the need for personalized treatment for patients with severe disease. The main aim of this review is to synthesize the available information and evidence on both repositioned and experimental drugs for the treatment of COVID-19, focusing on the need to exercise caution on the use of unproven medical therapies.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects about 160 million people worldwide. Currently, it is treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin, associated with a protease inhibitor in case of genotype 1 infection. However, this combination is often contraindicated and associated with severe adverse events that limit its use in clinical practice. Several drugs active against HCV are in an advanced phase of clinical development. Among these, sofosbuvir appears one of the most promising candidates for use in association with both interferon and interferon-free combinations. This review focuses on the results of several sofosbuvir-based phase III trials that have very recently become available. These studies show that the co-administration of sofosbuvir, PEG-IFN and ribavirin for 12 weeks is associated with a very high rate of sustained virological responses (SVR) (about 90%) in naïve patients with genotypes 1, 4, 5 or 6. In patients infected by genotypes 2 or 3, the interferon-free combination of sofosbuvir and ribavirin administered for 12 weeks is associated with a SVR of 97% and 56% in naïve patients, and of 86% and 30% in experienced genotype 2 or 3 patients, respectively. The safety and tolerability profile is optimal and consistent with that of the other drugs administered in the combination (ribavirin and/or interferon). In conclusion, the recent phase III trials of sofosbuvir confirm the excellent results of phase II studies in terms of efficacy and safety and will probably open a new era in the fight against HCV.