Utilizing and improving the productivity of reclaimed land are highly significant for alleviating the problem of food production shortage in China, and the integrated rice–frog farming model can improve soil fertility. However, there are few studies on the use of integrated rice–frog farming technology to improve the fertility of reclaimed land and increase its efficiency in food production. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the rice–frog co-cropping mode on the soil fertility and microbial diversity of reclaimed land. A rice monoculture group (SF), low-density rice–frog co-cropping group (SD, 5000 frogs/mu, corresponds to 8 frogs/m²), and high-density rice–frog co-cropping group (SG, 10,000 frogs/mu, corresponds to 15 frogs/m²) were established and tested. The contents of total nitrogen, soil organic matter, available potassium, and available phosphorus of the soil in the SG group were significantly higher than those in the SF group (p < 0.05) in the mature stage of rice. Compared with the SF group, the SD and SG groups improved the soil microbial diversity and changed the structure of the microbial community. This study indicates that compared with the rice monoculture mode, the rice–frog co-cropping pattern can improve the soil fertility, as well as microbial diversity, of reclaimed land.

Reclaimed fields have a low soil fertility and low productivity compared to conventional arable land, necessitating research on productivity enhancement. The rice–frog co-culture model is an ecologically intensive practice that combines biodiversity objectives with agricultural production needs, offering high ecological and economic value. However, there is a lack of research on this model that has focused on factors other than soil nutrient levels. The present study evaluated the rice–frog co-culture model in a reclaimed paddy field across three experimental plots with varying frog stocking densities: a rice monoculture (CG), low-density co-culture (LRF), and high-density co-culture (HRF). We investigated the effects of the frog density on greenhouse gas emissions throughout the rice growth. The rice–frog co-culture model significantly reduced methane (CH₄) emissions, with fluxes highest in the CG plot, followed by the LRF and then HRF plots. This reduction was achieved by altering the soil pH, the cation exchange capacity, the mcrA gene abundance, and the mcrA/pmoA gene abundance ratio. However, there was a contrasting nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission pattern. The co-culture model actually increased N₂O emissions, with fluxes being highest in the HRF plots, followed by the LRF and then CG plots. The correlation analysis identified the soil nosZ gene abundance, redox potential, urease activity, nirS gene abundance, and ratio of the combined nirK and nirS abundance to the nosZ abundance as key factors associated with N₂O emissions. While the co-cultivation model increased N₂O emissions, it also significantly reduced CH₄ emissions. Overall, the rice–frog co-culture model, especially at a high density, offers a favorable sustainable agricultural production model.

The accumulation of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) compromises food safety and endangers public health. Previous studies have postulated that ecological co-cultivation systems can potentially improve soil quality and reduce crop absorption of heavy metals. Herein, three treatment groups, rice mono-culture (CG), low-density rice–frog co-culture (LRF), and high-density rice–frog co-culture (HRF), were employed to evaluate the effects of rice–frog co-culture on the physicochemical properties of soils in reclaimed rice fields and heavy metal accumulation in rice. Notably, the rice–frog co-culture markedly increased levels of soil organic matter (SOM), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, and redox potential (Eh) (p < 0.05), particularly under high-density conditions, compared to the mono-culture system. These changes significantly reduced the bioavailable fractions of Cd, As, and Hg in the soil and substantially diminished their uptake in the roots, stems, leaves, and grains of rice. Conversely, the co-cultivation systems increased the bioavailable content and plant uptake of Pb, particularly under high-density conditions. These findings highlight the feasibility of the rice–frog co-cropping systems in improving soil conditions and reducing the accumulation of specific toxic metals within rice, thereby enhancing the safety of rice grown in reclaimed fields. However, increased Pb accumulation warrants further investigation.

The black-spotted frog (Pelophylax nigromaculatus) is a common economic species in the rice–frog ecological cropping mode. The present study investigated microbial community structures in paddy water and black-spotted frog’s guts across rice monoculture and low-/high-density rice–frog co-cropping systems at four rice growth stages. Proteobacteria dominate in paddy water, while frog guts are enriched in Firmicutes and Actinobacteriota. The frog density shows no impact on the α-diversity, but rice growth stages significantly alter the Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou_e indices (p < 0.01). Co-cropping may promote amino acid synthesis, elemental cycling, and stress tolerance in paddy water microbiota, which are more diverse than gut microbiota. Strong correlations exist between paddy water and gut microbiotas, with Limnohabitans being linked to gut diversity (p < 0.05). Low-density co-cropping enhances Xenorhabdus, which is beneficial for pest control and stabilizes gut microbiota. The results of this study offer insights for managing rice–frog systems based on rice growth stages.