Inflammation characterizes all stages of atherothrombosis and provides a critical pathophysiological link between plaque formation and its acute rupture, leading to coronary occlusion and heart attack. In the last 20 years the possibility of quantifying the degree of inflammation of atherosclerotic plaques and, therefore, also of vascular inflammation aroused much interest. ¹⁸Fluoro-deoxy-glucose photon-emissions-tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET) is widely used in oncology for staging and searching metastases; in cardiology, the absorption of ¹⁸F-FDG into the arterial wall was observed for the first time incidentally in the aorta of patients undergoing PET imaging for cancer staging. PET/CT imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) has been shown to assess atherosclerotic disease in its molecular phase, when the process may still be reversible. This approach has several limitations in the clinical practice, due to lack of prospective data to justify their use routinely, but it’s desirable to develop further scientific evidence to confirm this technique to detect high-risk patients for cardiovascular events.

Endocarditis, a serious infectious disease, remains a diagnostic challenge in contemporary clinical practice. The advent of advanced imaging modalities has contributed significantly to the improved understanding and management of this complex disease. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has shown remarkable potential in improving the diagnostic accuracy of endocarditis. In the update of the Modified Duke Criteria, in 2023, The International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) Working Group recognized specific 18F-FDG PET/CT findings as a major diagnostic criterion, particularly in patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis. The ability of PET to visualize metabolic activity allows for the identification of infective foci and could differentiate between infective and non-infective processes. This review examines the clinical utility of PET in differentiating infective endocarditis from other cardiovascular pathologies, highlighting its sensitivity and specificity in detecting native and prosthetic valve infections, including patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), cardiac implantable devices (CIEDs), and left ventricular assistance devices (LVAD). Also, practical aspects and indications are illustrated to optimize the quality of imaging and reduce potential false positive results. In conclusion, the current use of PET in endocarditis has become a valuable diagnostic tool; as technological advances continue, PET will play an increasingly important role in the multidisciplinary approach to the management of endocarditis.