Annette Marie La Greca

Prof. Dr. Annette Marie La Greca


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2005 in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Annette Marie La GrecaAnnette Marie La Greca
Annette Marie La Greca
HHHannah Moore Harrison
Hannah Moore Harrison
This study examined multiple levels of adolescents' interpersonal functioning, including general peer relations (peer crowd affiliations, peer victimization), and qualities of best friendships and ...

1 April 2021 in American Psychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJune Gruber
June Gruber
MPMitchell J. Prinstein
Mitchell J. Prinstein
LCLee Anna Clark
Lee Anna Clark
JRJonathan Rottenberg
Jonathan Rottenberg
JAJonathan S. Abramowitz
Jonathan S. Abramowitz
LWLauren M. Weinstock
Lauren M. Weinstock
COVID-19 presents significant social, economic, and medical challenges. Because COVID-19 has already begun to precipitate huge increases in mental health problems, clinical psychological science must assert a leadership role in guiding a national response to this secondary crisis. In this article, COVID-19 is conceptualized as a unique, compounding, multidimensional stressor that will create a vast need for intervention and necessitate new paradigms for mental health service delivery and training. Urgent challenge areas across developmental periods are discussed, followed by a review of psychological symptoms that likely will increase in prevalence and require innovative solutions in both science and practice. Implications for new research directions, clinical approaches, and policy issues are discussed to highlight the opportunities for clinical psychological science to emerge as an updated, contemporary field capable of addressing the burden of mental illness and distress in the wake of COVID-19 and beyond. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

1 January 2010 in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Annette Marie La GrecaAnnette Marie La Greca
Annette Marie La Greca
WSWendy K. Silverman
Wendy K. Silverman
BLBetty Lai
Betty Lai
JJJames Jaccard
James Jaccard
We investigated the influence of hurricane exposure, stressors occurring during the hurricane and recovery period, and social support on children's persistent posttraumatic stress (PTS). Using a 2-wave, prospective design, we assessed 384 children (54% girls; mean age = 8.74 years) 9 months posthurricane, and we reassessed 245 children 21 months posthurricane. Children completed measures of exposure experiences, social support, hurricane-related stressors, life events, and PTS symptoms. At Time 1, 35% of the children reported moderate to very severe levels of PTS symptoms; at Time 2, this reduced to 29%. Hurricane-related stressors influenced children's persistent PTS symptoms and the occurrence of other life events, which in turn also influenced persistent PTS symptoms. The cascading effects of hurricane stressors and other life events disrupted children's social support over time, which further influenced persistent PTS symptoms. Social support from peers buffered the impact of disaster exposure on children's PTS symptoms. The effects of a destructive hurricane on children's PTS symptoms persisted almost 2 years after the storm. The factors contributing to PTS symptoms are interrelated in complex ways. The findings suggest a need to close the gap between interventions delivered in the immediate and short-term aftermath and those delivered 2 years or more postdisaster. Such interventions might focus on helping children manage disaster-related stressors and other life events as well as bolstering children's support systems.

14 May 2013 in Child & Youth Care Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Annette Marie La GrecaAnnette Marie La Greca
Annette Marie La Greca
BLBetty S. Lai
Betty S. Lai
MLMaria M. Llabre
Maria M. Llabre
WSWendy K. Silverman
Wendy K. Silverman
EVEric M. Vernberg
Eric M. Vernberg
MPMitchell J. Prinstein
Mitchell J. Prinstein

1 April 2001 in Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Annette Marie La GrecaAnnette Marie La Greca
Annette Marie La Greca
MPMitchell J. Prinstein
Mitchell J. Prinstein
MFMichael D. Fetter
Michael D. Fetter
Objective: To examine adolescents' peer crowd affiliation and its linkages with health-risk behaviors, their friends' health-risk behaviors, the presence of close friends in the same peer crowd, and adolescents' social acceptance. Methods: We interviewed 250 high school students and identified six categories: popular, jocks, brains, burnouts, nonconformists, or average/other. Adolescents also reported on their health-risk behaviors (including use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana and other drugs; risky sexual behaviors; and other risk-taking behaviors), the health-risk behaviors of their friends, the peer crowd affiliation of their closest friends, and their perceived social acceptance. Results: Burnouts and nonconformists had the highest levels of health-risk behaviors across the areas assessed, the greatest proportions of close friends who engaged in similar behaviors, and relatively low social acceptance from peers. Brains and their friends engaged in extremely low levels of health-risk behaviors. Jocks and populars also showed evidence of selected areas of health risk; these teens also were more socially accepted than others. In general, adolescents' closest friends were highly nested within the same peer crowds. Conclusions: The findings further our understanding of adolescent behaviors that put them at risk for serious adult onset conditions associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. We discuss the implications of the findings for developing health promotion efforts for adolescents.

1 January 2009 in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Annette Marie La GrecaAnnette Marie La Greca
Annette Marie La Greca
WSWendy K. Silverman
Wendy K. Silverman
JLJohn E. Lochman
John E. Lochman
This Special Section of the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology focuses on research that extends beyond documenting the efficacy and effectiveness of specific psychological treatments or preventive interventions for children and youths. In the past 30 years, there have been remarkable advances in the development and evaluation of psychological treatments and preventive interventions for a wide range of child and adolescent problems. At the same time, only a small percentage of youths who suffer from emotional and behavioral problems receive psychological services, and many of these services are not evidence-based. This article discusses key features of the Special Section studies, which examine important issues related to (a) disseminating treatments in diverse community settings (i.e., investigating the transportability of treatment), (b) personalizing mental health care (i.e., investigating predictors and moderators of treatment outcome), and (c) developing evidence-based explanations of treatment (i.e., investigating mediators of treatment). Key issues that are raised in the specific studies are discussed, and important considerations for future research are highlighted. Moving the field forward requires innovation, complex research designs, and a willingness to develop treatment models that reach beyond the current body of treatment outcome and prevention research.