Aron Kristof Ghimessy

Dr. Aron Kristof Ghimessy

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 October 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAron Kristof Ghimessy
Aron Kristof Ghimessy
ÁGÁron Bertram Gellért
Áron Bertram Gellért
ESErzsebet Schlegl
Erzsebet Schlegl
BHBalazs Hegedus
Balazs Hegedus
ERErzsebet Raso
Erzsebet Raso
ÁGÁron Kristof Ghimessy
Áron Kristof Ghimessy
Bevacizumab, combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, has been widely used in the treatment of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). Although KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) mutation is the most common genetic alteration in human LADC and its role in promoting angiogenesis has been well established, its prognostic and predictive role in the above setting remains unclear. The association between KRAS exon 2 mutational status and clinicopathological variables including progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) was retrospectively analyzed in 501 Caucasian stage IIIB-IV LADC patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CHT) with or without bevacizumab (BEV). EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutant cases were excluded. Of 247 BEV/CHT and 254 CHT patients, 95 (38.5%) and 75 (29.5%) had mutations in KRAS, respectively. KRAS mutation was associated with smoking (p = 0.008) and female gender (p = 0.002) in the BEV/CHT group. We found no difference in OS between patients with KRAS-mutant versus KRAS wild-type tumors in the CHT-alone group (p = 0.6771). Notably, patients with KRAS-mutant tumors demonstrated significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.0255) and OS (p = 0.0186) in response to BEV/CHT compared to KRAS wild-type patients. KRAS mutation was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 0.597; p = 0.011) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.645; p = 0.012) in the BEV/CHT group. G12D KRAS-mutant patients receiving BEV/CHT showed significantly shorter PFS (3.7 months versus 8.27 months in the G12/13x group; p = 0.0032) and OS (7.2 months versus 16.1 months in the G12/13x group; p = 0.0144). In this single-center, retrospective study, KRAS-mutant LADC patients receiving BEV/CHT treatment exhibited inferior PFS and OS compared to those with KRAS wild-type advanced LADC. G12D mutations may define a subset of KRAS-mutant LADC patients unsuitable for antiangiogenic therapy with BEV.

1 May 2019 in Transplantation Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAron Kristof Ghimessy
Aron Kristof Ghimessy
AFAttila Farkas
Attila Farkas
BGBalázs Gieszer
Balázs Gieszer
PRPéter Radeczky
Péter Radeczky
KCKristóf Csende
Kristóf Csende
LBLevente Bogyó
Levente Bogyó

27 November 2018 in Oncology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEdina Tolnay
Edina Tolnay
ZSZsuzsanna Sztancsik
Zsuzsanna Sztancsik
ZVZsuzsanna Vennes
Zsuzsanna Vennes
ECEdit Csada
Edit Csada
AGAron Kristof Ghimessy
Aron Kristof Ghimessy
VSVeronika Sárosi
Veronika Sárosi
The previous results of former clinical studies confirmed that first‑line bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with chemotherapy improves clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non‑squamous non‑small cell lung cancer. The AVALANCHE study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03170284) was undertaken to assess the clinical outcomes of first‑line BEV combined with standard platinum‑based regimens in the Hungarian clinical practice. This observational study was conducted in 28 Hungarian sites, with patients enrolled between July 2008 and April 2011. Patients with untreated locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent lung adenocarcinoma received BEV (7.5 mg/kg, q3w) with any platinum‑doublet for up to 6 cycles, and then non‑progressors proceeded to receive BEV until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was time‑to‑progression, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), tumour control rate and safety. Patients were also analysed as two cohorts (non‑progressors vs. progressors) based on whether or not they received BEV maintenance therapy following completion of first‑line chemotherapy plus BEV. The study enrolled 283 patients (median age: 58.2 (18‑78) years; males: 50.5%; stage: III/B: 18.4%, IV: 79.9%; adenocarcinoma/other: 95.8/4.2%; ECOG PS 0/1/2/≥3: 30.8/59.7/2.6/1.4%). Centrally located tumours were reported in 21.6%. Cisplatin/carboplatin‑based regimens: 53.8/46.2%. A total of 43% of patients received BEV maintenance therapy. The median number of BEV cycles was 6. Median progression‑free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months and OS was 15.2 months for the entire cohort. Longer PFS and OS were observed in patients who received BEV maintenance therapy [median OS, 26.2 vs. 10.2 months (P<0.001); median PFS, 9.2 vs. 5.8 months (P<0.001)]. Contrary to the results of previous OCS no significant difference was recorded in the different age groups or gender. Best tumour response: Complete remission/partial remission/stable disease/progressive disease/not reported were: 1.5/29.9/26.9/9.1/32.6% of all patients. In conclusion, clinical outcomes obtained in this real‑life population were consistent with pivotal studies. BEV maintenance treatment was associated with a significantly longer PFS and OS.