Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks among the 15 most prevalent cancers globally, characterized by aggressive growth and late-stage diagnosis. Advances in imaging and surgical techniques have redefined the classification of pancreatic PDAC into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. While surgery remains the most effective treatment, only 20% of patients are eligible at diagnosis, necessitating innovative strategies to improve outcomes. Therefore, traditional treatment paradigms, primarily surgical resection for eligible patients, are increasingly supplemented by neoadjuvant therapies (NAT), which include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both. By administering systemic therapy prior to surgery, NAT aims to reduce tumor size and increase the feasibility of complete surgical resection, thus enhancing overall survival rates and potentially allowing more patients to undergo curative surgeries. Recent advances in treatment protocols, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, now integral to NAT strategies, have shown promising results in increasing the proportion of patients eligible for surgery by effectively reducing tumor size and addressing micrometastatic disease. Additionally, they offer improved response rates and survival benefits compared to traditional regimes. Despite these advancements, the role of NAT continues to evolve, necessitating ongoing research to optimize treatment regimens, minimize adverse effects, and identify patient populations that would benefit most from these approaches. Through a detailed analysis of current literature and recent clinical trials, this review highlights the transformative potential of NAT in managing PDAC, especially in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced stages, promising a shift towards more personalized and effective management strategies for PDAC.

Background/Objectives: Cognitive impairment is a debilitating comorbidity affecting diverse patient populations, yet the cognitive effects of therapies like mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) remain underexplored. Preclinical evidence suggests that MRAs, particularly spironolactone, may reduce cognitive decline by modulating aldosterone-dependent pathways and targeting hippocampal receptors. However, evidence in humans is fragmented, and no systematic review has consolidated these findings. This review evaluates the cognitive effects of MRAs, synthesizes current data, and identifies research gaps. Methods: A literature search using terms related to MRAs and cognitive outcomes was performed in PubMed and Web of Science from 1979 to 2023. A total of 143 articles were identified and 85 were screened after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 44 studies were included and were classified based on study design and population focus (preclinical, healthy controls, patients with psychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular patients). Results: Spironolactone demonstrated mixed effects on cognition. In healthy participants, it improved spatial memory under stress and prevented stress-related suppression of medial temporal activity, but impaired working memory and selective attention. In patients with psychiatric conditions, spironolactone reduced cognitive empathy deficits in major depressive disorder and improved working memory in bipolar I disorder. In cardiovascular patients, spironolactone improved cognitive scores and hippocampal memory but had no effect on non-hippocampal memory. Conclusions: Spironolactone exhibits potential cognitive benefits across diverse populations. However, its effects on cognition are mixed, highlighting the need for further research to understand its mechanisms and therapeutic potential, particularly in patients with heart failure and other related conditions.