Piezoelectric energy harvesters are considered a replacement for batteries because they are self-sustainable with low or no maintenance, and suitable for off-grid devices. In this study, two cylinders were placed in a flowing stream of water. The upstream cylinder of 25 mm diameter is fixed at the center of the stream while another cylinder of the same diameter, which is free to oscillate in the crosswise direction of the flow and is placed in the wake of that fixed cylinder. A piezoelectric flag is then placed in the wake of the vibrating cylinder and its distance from the vibrating cylinder was changed to observe the effect of wake length on the energy harvester. The energy harvesting potential of the system is explored for flow velocities ranging from 0.28 m/s to 0.36 m/s. The distance between the cylinders Gx, which is explored for the range of 2.5D–7D, and the distance between the piezoelectric membrane and the vibrating cylinder are expressed as Sx for the same range. The maximum power of 19.17 μW was produced at Sx = 2D and Gx = 3.5D. The maximum power for the baseline case, when two tandemly arranged stationary circular cylinders were used and a piezoelectric membrane was placed in their wake, is 10.24 μW; hence, an increase of 87.2% is observed under the same ambient conditions.

An experimental analysis of the effect of size variation for a cylindrical-shaped bluff body in flow-induced vibration (FIV) for the purposes of harvesting ambient energy is explored in this study. The research was conducted at a very low Reynold’s number in a closed-loop tunnel operating at a very low speed. An investigation of the power generation potential achieved by varying the size of the bluff body was conducted. A comparative study is also presented for varying the diameter configuration against the distance of the energy-harvesting piezoelectric flag from the cylindrical bluff body. At distances other than the optimal distance of the piezoelectric harvester from the bluff body, reduced efficacy of the power generation is observed. The results show a 17% increase in power with the use of 2x the size of the reference bluff body.