Radiologists assisted by deep learning for interpretation of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI scans showed a marked reduction in reporting time and superior or equivalent interobserver agreement for a... Background Lumbar spine MRI studies are widely used for back pain assessment. Interpretation involves grading lumbar spinal stenosis, which is repetitive and time consuming. Deep learning (DL) coul...

Diagnostic imaging, particularly MRI, plays a key role in the evaluation of many spine pathologies. Recent progress in artificial intelligence and its subset, machine learning, has led to many applications within spine MRI, which we sought to examine in this review. A literature search of the major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search yielded 1226 results, of which 50 studies were selected for inclusion. Key data from these studies were extracted. Studies were categorized thematically into the following: Image Acquisition and Processing, Segmentation, Diagnosis and Treatment Planning, and Patient Selection and Prognostication. Gaps in the literature and the proposed areas of future research are discussed. Current research demonstrates the ability of artificial intelligence to improve various aspects of this field, from image acquisition to analysis and clinical care. We also acknowledge the limitations of current technology. Future work will require collaborative efforts in order to fully exploit new technologies while addressing the practical challenges of generalizability and implementation. In particular, the use of foundation models and large-language models in spine MRI is a promising area, warranting further research. Studies assessing model performance in real-world clinical settings will also help uncover unintended consequences and maximize the benefits for patient care.

Background: Breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women globally. Mammography is a key diagnostic modality; however, interpretation is increasingly challenged by rising imaging volumes, a global shortage of breast radiologists, and variability in reader experience. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a potential adjunct to address these issues, particularly in settings with high breast density, such as Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of AI assistance on mammographic diagnostic performance among resident and consultant radiologists in Singapore. Objective: To assess whether AI assistance improves diagnostic accuracy in mammographic breast cancer detection across radiologists with varying levels of experience. Methods: A multi-reader, multi-case study was conducted at the National University Hospital, Singapore, from May to August 2023. De-identified digital mammograms from 500 women (250 with cancer and 250 normal or benign) were interpreted by 17 radiologists (4 consultants, 4 senior residents, and 9 junior residents). Each radiologist read all cases over 2 reading sessions: one without AI assistance and another with AI assistance, separated by a 1-month washout period. The AI system (FxMammo) provided heatmaps and malignancy risk scores to support decision-making. Area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Results: Among the 500 cases, 250 were malignant and 250 were non-malignant. Of the malignant cases, 16%(80/500) were ductal carcinoma in situ and 84%(420/500) were invasive cancers. Among non-malignant cases, 69.2%(346/500) were normal, 17.6%(88) benign, and 3.6%(18/500) possibly benign but stable on follow-up. Masses (54.4%, 272) and calcifications (10.8%, 54/500) were the most common findings in cancer cases. A majority of both malignant (66.8%, 334/500) and non-malignant (68%, 340/500) cases had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts (BIRADS [Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System] categories C and D). The AI model achieved an AUROC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.91‐0.95), slightly higher than consultant radiologists (AUROC 0.90, 95% CI 0.89‐0.92; P =.21). With AI assistance, AUROC improved among junior residents (from 0.84 to 0.86; P =.38) and senior residents (from 0.85 to 0.88; P =.13), with senior residents approaching consultant-level performance (AUROC difference 0.02; P =.051). Diagnostic gains with AI were greatest in women with dense breasts and among less experienced radiologists. AI also improved inter-reader agreement and time efficiency, particularly in benign or normal cases. Conclusions: This is the first study in Asia to evaluate AI assistance in mammography interpretation by radiologists of varying experience. AI significantly improved diagnostic performance and efficiency among residents, helping to narrow the experience-performance gap without compromising specificity. These findings suggest a role for AI in enhancing diagnostic consistency, improving workflow, and supporting training. Integration into clinical and educational settings may offer scalable benefits, though careful attention to threshold calibration, feedback loops, and real-world validation remains essential. Further studies in routine screening settings are needed to confirm generalizability and cost-effectiveness.

Background: Degenerative cervical spondylosis (DCS) is a common and potentially debilitating condition, with surgery indicated in selected patients. Deep learning models (DLMs) can improve consistency in grading DCS neural stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), though existing models focus on axial images, and comparisons are mostly limited to radiologists. Methods: We developed an enhanced transformer-based DLM that trains on sagittal images and optimizes axial and foraminal classification using a maximized dataset. DLM training utilized 648 scans, with internal testing on 75 scans and external testing on an independent 75-scan dataset. Performance of the DLM, spine surgeons, and radiologists of varying subspecialities/seniority were compared against a consensus reference standard. Results: On internal testing, the DLM achieved high agreement for all-class classification: axial spinal canal κ = 0.80 (95%CI: 0.72–0.82), sagittal spinal canal κ = 0.83 (95%CI: 0.81–0.85), and neural foramina κ = 0.81 (95%CI: 0.77–0.84). In comparison, human readers demonstrated lower levels of agreement (κ = 0.60–0.80). External testing showed modestly degraded model performance (κ = 0.68–0.77). Conclusions: These results demonstrate the utility of transformer-based DLMs in multiplanar MRI interpretation, surpassing spine surgeons and radiologists on internal testing and highlighting its potential for real-world clinical adoption.