Artificial Intelligence (AI) is redefining electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in pre-participation examination (PPE) of athletes, enhancing the detection and monitoring of cardiovascular health. Cardiovascular concerns, including sudden cardiac death, pose significant risks during sports activities. Traditional ECG, essential yet limited, often fails to distinguish between benign cardiac adaptations and serious conditions. This narrative review investigates the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in ECG interpretation, aiming to improve the detection of arrhythmias, channelopathies, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. A literature review over the past decade, sourcing from PubMed and Google Scholar, highlights the growing adoption of AI in sports medicine for its precision and predictive capabilities. AI algorithms excel at identifying complex cardiac patterns, potentially overlooked by traditional methods, and are increasingly integrated into wearable technologies for continuous monitoring. Overall, by offering a comprehensive overview of current innovations and outlining future advancements, this review supports sports medicine professionals in merging traditional screening methods with state-of-the-art AI technologies. This approach aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in athlete care, promoting early detection and more effective monitoring through AI-enhanced ECG analysis within athlete PPEs.

Background: Mediastinal staging plays a critical role in guiding treatment decisions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with comparable diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance, safety, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of EBUS-TBNA versus mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including searches in Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies published from 2010 onwards. A total of 1542 studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying eligibility criteria, 100 studies were included for detailed analysis. The extracted data focused on sensitivity, specificity, complications, economic impact, and patient outcomes. Results: EBUS-TBNA demonstrated high sensitivity (85–94%) and specificity (~100%), making it an effective first-line modality for NSCLC staging. Mediastinoscopy remained highly specific (~100%) but exhibited slightly lower sensitivity (86–90%). EBUS-TBNA had a lower complication rate (~2%) and was more cost-effective, while mediastinoscopy provided larger biopsy samples, essential for molecular and histological analyses. The need for general anaesthesia, longer hospital stays, and increased procedural costs make mediastinoscopy less favourable as an initial approach. Combining both techniques in select cases enhanced overall staging accuracy, reducing false negatives and improving diagnostic confidence. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA has become the preferred first-line mediastinal staging method due to its minimally invasive approach, high diagnostic accuracy, and lower cost. However, mediastinoscopy remains crucial in cases requiring posterior mediastinal node assessment or larger tissue samples. The integration of both techniques in a stepwise diagnostic strategy offers the highest accuracy while minimizing risks and costs. Given the lower hospitalization rates and economic benefits associated with EBUS-TBNA, its widespread adoption may contribute to more efficient resource utilization in healthcare systems.