Peter Muscarella II

Dr. Peter Muscarella II

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2014 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGeorge Van Buren
George Van Buren
MBMark Bloomston
Mark Bloomston
SHSteven J. Hughes
Steven J. Hughes
JWJordan Winter
Jordan Winter
SBStephen W. Behrman
Stephen W. Behrman
WFWilliam E. Fisher
William E. Fisher
To test by randomized prospective multicenter trial the hypothesis that pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) without the use of intraperitoneal drainage does not increase the frequency or severity of complications. Some surgeons have abandoned the use of drains placed during pancreas resection. We randomized 137 patients to PD with (n = 68, drain group) and without (n = 69, no-drain group) the use of intraperitoneal drainage and compared the safety of this approach and spectrum of complications between the 2 groups. There were no differences between drain and no-drain cohorts in demographics, comorbidities, pathology, pancreatic duct size, pancreas texture, baseline quality of life, or operative technique. PD without intraperitoneal drainage was associated with an increase in the number of complications per patient [1 (0-2) vs 2 (1-4), P = 0.029]; an increase in the number of patients who had at least 1 ≥grade 2 complication [35 (52%) vs 47 (68%), P = 0.047]; and a higher average complication severity [2 (0-2) vs 2 (1-3), P = 0.027]. PD without intraperitoneal drainage was associated with a higher incidence of gastroparesis, intra-abdominal fluid collection, intra-abdominal abscess (10% vs 25%, P = 0.027), severe (≥grade 2) diarrhea, need for a postoperative percutaneous drain, and a prolonged length of stay. The Data Safety Monitoring Board stopped the study early because of an increase in mortality from 3% to 12% in the patients undergoing PD without intraperitoneal drainage. This study provides level 1 data, suggesting that elimination of intraperitoneal drainage in all cases of PD increases the frequency and severity of complications.

1 October 2013 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WHWei A. He
Wei A. He
EBEmanuele Berardi
Emanuele Berardi
VCVeronica M. Cardillo
Veronica M. Cardillo
SASwarnali Acharyya
Swarnali Acharyya
PAPaola Aulino
Paola Aulino
DGDenis C. Guttridge
Denis C. Guttridge
Cachexia is a debilitating condition characterized by extreme skeletal muscle wasting that contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. Efforts to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of muscle loss have predominantly focused on events intrinsic to the myofiber. In contrast, less regard has been given to potential contributory factors outside the fiber within the muscle microenvironment. In tumor-bearing mice and patients with pancreatic cancer, we found that cachexia was associated with a type of muscle damage resulting in activation of both satellite and nonsatellite muscle progenitor cells. These muscle progenitors committed to a myogenic program, but were inhibited from completing differentiation by an event linked with persistent expression of the self-renewing factor Pax7. Overexpression of Pax7 was sufficient to induce atrophy in normal muscle, while under tumor conditions, the reduction of Pax7 or exogenous addition of its downstream target, MyoD, reversed wasting by restoring cell differentiation and fusion with injured fibers. Furthermore, Pax7 was induced by serum factors from cachectic mice and patients, in an NF-κB–dependent manner, both in vitro and in vivo. Together, these results suggest that Pax7 responds to NF-κB by impairing the regenerative capacity of myogenic cells in the muscle microenvironment to drive muscle wasting in cancer.

6 August 2014 in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMargaret A. Tempero
Margaret A. Tempero
MMMokenge P. Malafa
Mokenge P. Malafa
SBStephen W. Behrman
Stephen W. Behrman
ABAl B. Benson
Al B. Benson
ECEphraim S. Casper
Ephraim S. Casper
DFDeborah A. Freedman-Cass
Deborah A. Freedman-Cass
The NCCN Guidelines for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma discuss the diagnosis and management of adenocarcinomas of the exocrine pancreas and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize major discussion points from the 2014 NCCN Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Panel meeting. The panel discussion focused mainly on the management of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease. In particular, the panel discussed the definition of borderline resectable disease, role of neoadjuvant therapy in borderline disease, role of chemoradiation in locally advanced disease, and potential role of newer, more active chemotherapy regimens in both settings.

1 November 2005 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASwarnali Acharyya
Swarnali Acharyya
MBMatthew E R Butchbach
Matthew E R Butchbach
ZSZarife Sahenk
Zarife Sahenk
HWHuating Wang
Huating Wang
MSMotoyasu Saji
Motoyasu Saji
DGDenis C. Guttridge
Denis C. Guttridge

31 October 2014 in Annals of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMarlo Blazer
Marlo Blazer
CWChristina Wu
Christina Wu
RGRichard M. Goldberg
Richard M. Goldberg
GPGary Phillips
Gary Phillips
CSCarl Schmidt
Carl Schmidt
TBTanios Bekaii-Saab
Tanios Bekaii-Saab

14 August 2007 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJeffrey W. Hazey
Jeffrey W. Hazey
VNVimal K. Narula
Vimal K. Narula
DRDavid B. Renton
David B. Renton
KRKevin M. Reavis
Kevin M. Reavis
CPChristopher M. Paul
Christopher M. Paul
WMW. Scott Melvin
W. Scott Melvin