Click on the title to browse this book

Deep learning has demonstrated remarkable accuracy analyzing images for cancer detection tasks in recent years. The accuracy that has been achieved rivals radiologists and is suitable for implementation as a clinical tool. However, a significant problem is that these models are black-box algorithms therefore they are intrinsically unexplainable. This creates a barrier for clinical implementation due to lack of trust and transparency that is a characteristic of black box algorithms. Additionally, recent regulations prevent the implementation of unexplainable models in clinical settings which further demonstrates a need for explainability. To mitigate these concerns, there have been recent studies that attempt to overcome these issues by modifying deep learning architectures or providing after-the-fact explanations. A review of the deep learning explanation literature focused on cancer detection using MR images is presented here. The gap between what clinicians deem explainable and what current methods provide is discussed and future suggestions to close this gap are provided.

Validating online stream classifiers has traditionally assumed the availability of labeled samples, which can be monitored over time, to detect concept drift. However, labeling in streaming domains is expensive, time consuming and in certain applications, such as land mine detection, not a possibility at all. In this paper, the Margin Density Drift Detection (MD3) approach is proposed, which can signal change using unlabeled samples and requires labeling only for retraining, in the event of a drift. The MD3 approach when evaluated on 5 synthetic and 5 real world drifting data streams, produced statistically equivalent classification accuracy to that of a fully labeled accuracy tracking drift detector, and required only a third of the samples to be labeled, on average