Introduction: The data in the scientific literature about the significance of seizure severity and frequency for the quality of life (QOL) of patients with refractory epilepsy (RE) are contradictory. Objective: Our objective was to assess the impact of the seizure severity and frequency on the QOL of Bulgarian patients with RE. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 patients with RE were studied by examining the medical documentation and seizure diaries. All study participants completed quality of life epilepsy inventory (QOLIE-89). Seizure severity of only 59 patients who had a seizure in the last month was assessed by the Liverpool seizure severity scale. Results: A limited negative impact of the seizure severity and frequency on some aspects of the physical health, epilepsy, all aspects of the social health and epilepsy and the overall QOL has been demonstrated. A weak to moderate reverse correlation between the specified factors and the respective QOLIE-89 subscales has been found. Conclusion: The clinical factors seizure severity and seizure frequency have a limited negative impact mostly on the social aspects of QOL. The study results support the multidisciplinary approach to persons with epilepsy.

Purpose. We aimed to assess the influence of adverse events (AEs) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on perceived stigma of Bulgarian patients with epilepsy. Methods. Our study was based on questionnaires (Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) and stigma scale), information from medical documentation, and an interview on clinical factors of 153 consecutive patients with epilepsy. Results. Perceived stigma was observed in 64.71% of the study participants. There was a significant association between perceived stigma and the total LAEP score (p<0.05, F=13.71). Patients who reported AEs had an increased risk of perceiving stigma compared to those who did not experience AEs. A significant correlation between perceived stigma and the presence of neurological and psychiatric AEs (p<0.001, r=+0.60) and a mild correlation between perceived stigma and the presence of nonneurological AEs (p<0.01, r=+0.20) were verified. In a multivariate regression analysis the only predictors of perceived stigma were AED polytherapy and the presence of neurological and psychiatric AEs. Conclusions. AEs of AEDs in patients with epilepsy significantly correlate with perceived stigma. Our study results will be useful in the campaign to overcome stigma predictors.

Moyamoya disease is a cerebrovascular pathology characterized by progressive stenosis of the internal carotid arteries and their branches, leading to ischemic and/or hemorrhagic disorders of the cerebral circulation, primarily affecting children and young adults. We present a case of a 23-year-old woman with a history of recurrent cerebrovascular accidents since childhood. Despite experiencing focal motor seizures and transient ischemic attacks, her condition remained undiagnosed until 2006, when, at the age of 7, a digital subtraction angiography revealed characteristic bilateral internal carotid artery occlusions. Subsequent diagnostic challenges and treatments preceded a worsening of symptoms in adulthood, including generalized tonic–clonic seizures. Upon presentation to our clinic, the patient exhibited upper motor neuron syndrome and occipital lobe syndrome, consistent with the disease’s pathophysiology, neuroimaging, and clinical manifestations. Imaging studies confirmed multiple ischemic lesions throughout the cerebral vasculature. Treatment adjustments were made due to the increased incidence of seizures, and the dose of her anti-seizure medication—divalproex sodium—was increased. This case underscores the diagnostic complexities and challenges in managing moyamoya disease, emphasizing the importance of early recognition and prompt intervention.